Select Search
World Factbook
Roget's Int'l Thesaurus
Bartlett's Quotations
Respectfully Quoted
Fowler's King's English
Strunk's Style
Mencken's Language
Cambridge History
The King James Bible
Oxford Shakespeare
Gray's Anatomy
Farmer's Cookbook
Post's Etiquette
Brewer's Phrase & Fable
Bulfinch's Mythology
Frazer's Golden Bough
All Verse
Anthologies
Dickinson, E.
Eliot, T.S.
Frost, R.
Hopkins, G.M.
Keats, J.
Lawrence, D.H.
Masters, E.L.
Sandburg, C.
Sassoon, S.
Whitman, W.
Wordsworth, W.
Yeats, W.B.
All Nonfiction
Harvard Classics
American Essays
Einstein's Relativity
Grant, U.S.
Roosevelt, T.
Wells's History
Presidential Inaugurals
All Fiction
Shelf of Fiction
Ghost Stories
Short Stories
Shaw, G.B.
Stein, G.
Stevenson, R.L.
Wells, H.G.
Reference
>
Cambridge History
>
From Steele and Addison to Pope and Swift
>
Berkeley and Contemporary Philosophy
> Arthur Collier
His
Common-place Book
The Deistical Controversy in English Theology; Charles Blount; Charles Leslie as Champion of Orthodoxy
CONTENTS
·
VOLUME CONTENTS
·
INDEX OF ALL CHAPTERS
·
BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD
The Cambridge History of English and American Literature in 18 Volumes
(190721).
Volume IX. From Steele and Addison to Pope and Swift.
XI.
Berkeley and Contemporary Philosophy
.
§ 9. Arthur Collier.
In 1713, three years after the appearance of Berkeleys
Principles,
Arthur Collier, rector of Langford Magna, near Salisbury, published a work entitled
Clavis Universalis
and professing to be a demonstration of the non-existence or impossibility of an external world. Collier was born in 1680, and, like Berkeley, seems to have formed his conclusions at an early age: for he says that it was after a ten years pause and deliberation that he decided to put his arguments before the reader. His results are almost identical with Berkeleys; but he arrived at them in a different way. He seems to have been uninfluenced by Locke; Descartes, Malebranche and Norris were his favourite authors; and there was enough, in their writings, to raise the question. Collier writes in a straight-forward and simple style; he has none of Berkeleys imagination or eloquence; he does not contend that he has the plain man on his side, nor does he apply his results to current controversy. But he has no less confidence than Berkeley had in the truth of his views; and his arguments are clearly put. Often, they resemble Berkeleys; though greater use is made of traditional metaphysical discussions. Among these, the most notable is the argument from the antinomies of philosophical thought. The external world, conceived as independent of mind, has been held infinite in extent, and also it has been held to be finite; and equally good and conclusive reasons can be given for either alternative. Similarly, it is both finitely and infinitely divisible. But a thing cannot have two contradictory predicates. External matter, therefore, does not exist.
11
II. D
EISTS
CONTENTS
·
VOLUME CONTENTS
·
INDEX OF ALL CHAPTERS
·
BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD
His
Common-place Book
The Deistical Controversy in English Theology; Charles Blount; Charles Leslie as Champion of Orthodoxy
Loading
Click
here
to shop the
Bartleby Bookstore
.
Shakespeare
·
Bible
·
Saints
·
Anatomy
·
Harvard Classics
·
Lit. History
·
Quotations
·
Poetry
©
19932013
Bartleby.com
· [
Top 150
]