Select Search
World Factbook
Roget's Int'l Thesaurus
Bartlett's Quotations
Respectfully Quoted
Fowler's King's English
Strunk's Style
Mencken's Language
Cambridge History
The King James Bible
Oxford Shakespeare
Gray's Anatomy
Farmer's Cookbook
Post's Etiquette
Brewer's Phrase & Fable
Bulfinch's Mythology
Frazer's Golden Bough
All Verse
Anthologies
Dickinson, E.
Eliot, T.S.
Frost, R.
Hopkins, G.M.
Keats, J.
Lawrence, D.H.
Masters, E.L.
Sandburg, C.
Sassoon, S.
Whitman, W.
Wordsworth, W.
Yeats, W.B.
All Nonfiction
Harvard Classics
American Essays
Einstein's Relativity
Grant, U.S.
Roosevelt, T.
Wells's History
Presidential Inaugurals
All Fiction
Shelf of Fiction
Ghost Stories
Short Stories
Shaw, G.B.
Stein, G.
Stevenson, R.L.
Wells, H.G.
Reference
>
Cambridge History
>
The Victorian Age, Part Two
>
The Literature of Science
> Richard Owen
Buckland
Edward Forbes
CONTENTS
·
VOLUME CONTENTS
·
INDEX OF ALL CHAPTERS
·
BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD
The Cambridge History of English and American Literature in 18 Volumes
(190721).
Volume XIV. The Victorian Age, Part Two.
VIII.
The Literature of Science
.
§ 49. Richard Owen.
On the zoological side, one of the most productive morphological anatomists of the nineteenth century was Richard Owen, Hunterian professor and, later, conservator of the museum of the Royal college of Surgeons. In 1856, he became superintendent of the natural history branch of the British Museum, and this post he held until 1884. He added greatly to our knowledge of animal structure by his successful dissection of many rare forms, such as the pearly nautilus,
limulus, lingula, apteryx
and others, and, following on the lines of Cuvier, he was particularly successful in reconstructing extinct vertebrates. Another considerable advance he made in science was the introduction of the terms homologous and analogous. His successor in both his posts, Sir William Flower, an authority on cetacea and on mammals in general, took an active part in arranging the contents of the museums under his charge in such a way as to teach the intelligent public a lesson in morphology and classification.
125
Throughout the century, repeated attempts had been made to classify the members of the animal kingdom on a natural basis, but, until their anatomy and, indeed, their embryology had been sufficiently explored, these attempts proved somewhat vain. As late as 1869, Huxley classified sponges with
Protozoa, Echinoderms
with
Scolecida
and
Tunicates
with
Polyzoa
and
Brachiopoda.
By the middle of the century, much work had been done in sorting out the animal kingdom on a natural basis, and Vaughan Thompson had already shown that
Flustra
was not a hydroid, but a member of a new group which he named
Polyzoa.
Although hardly remembered now, he demonstrated, by tracing their development, that
Cirripedia
are not molluscs; he established the fact that they began life as free-swimming
Crustacea;
he, again, it was who showed that
Pentacrinus
is the larval form of the feather-star,
Antedon.
126
CONTENTS
·
VOLUME CONTENTS
·
INDEX OF ALL CHAPTERS
·
BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD
Buckland
Edward Forbes
Loading
Click
here
to shop the
Bartleby Bookstore
.
Shakespeare
·
Bible
·
Saints
·
Anatomy
·
Harvard Classics
·
Lit. History
·
Quotations
·
Poetry
©
19932013
Bartleby.com
· [
Top 150
]