Individual Staff Product Running Estimate

.docx

School

Command & General Staff College *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

M000

Subject

Information Systems

Date

Feb 20, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

Uploaded by ProfWaspMaster905 on coursehero.com

US ARMY COMMAND AND GENERAL STAFF COLLEGE US Army Command and General Staff School Command and General Staff Officer Course (CGSOC) Advanced Operations Course Module 0: The Operations Process and the Brigade M000 Elective Advance Sheet Appendix A: Assessment Plan Annex 2: Individual Running Estimate Assessment Student Name: Staff Group: 4D Warfighting Function: Intelligence Date: Instructor: Department: Purpose: This assessment evaluates your ability to analyze an operation as a staff officer and to clearly and concisely communicate information and recommendations that facilitate the commander’s understanding of the operational environment and sound decision-making. Instructions: Develop a running estimate based on your assigned warfighting function (WfF) using the format provided. Your running estimate should demonstrate analysis of the brigade's operations in relation to your assigned warfighting function. Your running estimate should encompass the entire warfighting function and not focus on a particular branch. This is an individual , open-note, take-home assignment. As an individual requirement, you may not receive assistance from anyone other than your DTAC instructor. You may individually reference FM 5-0 Planning and Orders Production , other relevant doctrinal publications, any of the school-provided scenario information including maps and graphics student developed MDMP products, curriculum products, maps, graphics, and CPCE/JPS products you feel may help you to complete this requirement. You may not reference other student running estimates (even if a different WfF), student work from previous years (even if in a different format), or similar work found from other sources such as the internet. This constitutes academic ethics violations in accordance with CGSC Bulletin 920. Your responses should be clear, concise, and complete sentences using proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation. All submissions must be typed using the formation provided and submitted via Blackboard by the specified due date and time. Your submission must not exceed three pages, Times New Roman font, size 11, single-spaced. M000 A2-1 AY24

Module 0 The Operations Process and the Brigade Annex 2 (Running Estimate Rubric) to Appendix A: Assessment Plan Rubric Component Excellent (5) Satisfactory (4) Needs Improvement / Unsat (3-0) Facts, Assumptions, and Constraints Identified at least two facts, two assumptions, and one constraint; clearly and concisely explained impact to WfF and/or mission; used complete sentences and proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Identified at least one fact, one assumption, and one constraint; explained impact to WfF and/or mission; generally free of grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Did not identify at least one fact, assumption, and/or constraint; did not adequately explain impact to WfF and/or mission; distracting grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation errors. Specified, Implied Tasks Identified all the specified tasks for the WfF; identified at least one implied task that was necessary to accomplish one of the identified specified tasks; used complete sentences and proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Identified at least half but not all the specified tasks for the WfF; identified one implied task that was necessary to accomplish one of the identified specified tasks; generally free of grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Identified less than half of the specified tasks for the WfF; did not identify an implied task or identified implied task(s) were not necessary to accomplish any of the identified specified tasks; distracting grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation errors. Friendly Systems, Capabilities, and Requirements Identified all the internal WfF equipment and systems, the additional WfF resources available at higher echelon, and WfF capabilities from other military or civilian partners, as applicable; clearly and concisely articulated the WfF requirements needed to accomplish the mission and why; used complete sentences and proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Identified most of the internal WfF equipment and systems, the additional WfF resources available at higher echelon, and WfF capabilities from other military or civilian partners, as applicable; generally explained WfF requirements needed to accomplish the mission and why; generally free of grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Failed to identify many of the internal WfF equipment and systems, the additional WfF resources available at higher echelon, and WfF capabilities from other military or civilian partners, as applicable; poorly addressed WfF requirements needed to accomplish the mission and/or did not explain why; distracting grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation errors. Friendly Shortfalls and Risks Identified all WfF shortfalls by comparing the capabilities versus the requirements; provided recommendations for identified shortfalls; identified at least one risk relevant to the WfF and recommended appropriate mitigation for that risk; used complete sentences and proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Identified most of the WfF shortfalls by comparing the capabilities versus the requirements; provided recommendations for identified shortfalls; identified one risk relevant to the WfF; did not offer recommended mitigation or recommendation was not adequate; generally free of grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Did not adequately address friendly shortfalls and/or failed to provide recommendations for identified shortfalls; did not identify risks relevant to the WfF; distracting grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation errors. Enemy Forces Described composition of all enemy systems and their capabilities, their disposition, their estimated strength one echelon down, including separate units at lower echelons, and fully addressed their potential effects pertaining to assigned WfF; used complete sentences and proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Described composition of most enemy systems and their capabilities, their disposition, their estimated strength one echelon down, including separate units at lower echelons; limited discussion of potential effects pertaining to assigned WfF; generally free of grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Poorly described or did not describe composition enemy systems and their capabilities, their disposition, their estimated strength one echelon down, including separate units at lower echelons; and/or did not discuss potential effects pertaining to assigned WfF; distracting grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation errors. M000 A2-2 AY24

Module 0 The Operations Process and the Brigade Annex 2 (Running Estimate Rubric) to Appendix A: Assessment Plan Component Excellent (5) Satisfactory (4) Needs Improvement / Unsat (3-0) Intel Requirement (Enemy), Information Requirement (Friendly), and EEFI Identified at least one intel requirement (enemy/terrain), one info requirement (friendly), and one EEFI for assigned WfF; clearly and concisely explained why each was important for decision-making; used complete sentences and proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Identified one intel requirement (enemy/terrain), one info requirement (friendly), and one EEFI for assigned WfF; explained why each was important but lacked relevance for decision-making; generally free of grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Did not identify at least intel requirement (enemy/terrain), one info requirement (friendly), and one EEFI for assigned WfF; or did not explain why each was important for decision-making; distracting grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation errors. Analysis and Conclusions Distinguished and prioritized the main issues, risks, deficiencies, and potential enemy actions and summarized their impact to mission success and commander decision- making; used complete sentences and proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Distinguished, but did not prioritize, the main issues, risks, deficiencies, and potential enemy actions; did not fully summarize their impact to mission success and commander decision-making; generally free of grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Did not clearly identify issues, risks, deficiencies, and/or potential enemy actions and did not summarize their impact or the summary was unclear; distracting grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation errors. Recommendations For assigned WfF, recommended the most supportable COA (multiple COAs) or potential improvements to the COA (single COA) and clearly explained why; used complete sentences and proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation. For assigned WfF, recommended the most supportable COA (multiple COAs) or potential improvements to the COA (single COA); provide limited or unclear explanation as to why; generally free of grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. For assigned WfF, recommended the most supportable COA (multiple COAs) or potential improvements to the COA (single COA but did not explain why, or did not provide recommendation; distracting grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation errors. Overall Assessment Points Percent Grade 40-38.8 97-100 A+ 38.76-37.6 96.99-94 A 37.56-36 93.99-90 A- 35.96-34.8 89.99-87 B+ 34.76-32 86.99-80 B 31.96-31.31.2 79.99-77 C+ 31.16-28 76.99-70 C 27.96-0 <70 U M000 A2-3 AY24

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help