Essay on A Look at Various Leadership Styles

Leadership can be defined as the process of identifying a goal, motivating others, and make them to achieve the mutually goals (Giltinane, 2013). According to Humphreys (2002), successful leaders do this by applying their leadership knowledge and skills. A good leadership is not only good at management, but also use different leadership styles in different situations. A successful corporation must has a good leader who have the flexible ability which can provide a suitable leadership to make the company successful. Furthermore, there have no perfect leadership styles in the world. Different leader have different leadership styles which also have the different strengths and weaknesses (Ali & Waqar, 2013). Leaders need to consider

A1. Leadership Style Upon conducting research, it is clear that the definition of “leadership” is not agreed upon. It is fluid, based upon many perceptions, situations, and surroundings. According to Robinson (2010), adopting a specific style of leadership is rather futile as it is, “contingent on the personal traits of the leader, the people being led, and the nature of the activity.” Tools are available to help guide potential leaders in determining a preferred style of leadership. For example, utilizing the “Leadership Self-Assessment

Leadership Evaluation and Philosophy: An Appraisal of Angela Merkel’s Leadership during the Euro Crisis and My Leadership Philosophy

Please answer the following questions related to a leader you have experienced in your personal or professional life. Chapter 22 outlines the different leadership styles.

The leadership styles of the United States Presidents can make them effective or it can limit their effectiveness. The effectiveness of the President has direct effect on the American people. Presidents Dwight Eisenhower and John Kennedy were two leaders that had major influences in the mid-20th century. Both men played a key role in the United States involvement in Vietnam. The experiences, styles of leading, and characteristics of both President’s Dwight Eisenhower and John F. Kennedy intensified the level of involvement the United States had in the Vietnam experience. Even though the leadership styles may have differed, the two leaders refused to let communism spread (Moss, 2010).

When you think of the terms: leader and leadership, you generally equate them with being only one person. However, my view of leadership, especially effective leadership, is a shared function between many individuals. There are numerous leadership theories. As a whole, leadership theories should be implemented to contribute to the improvement of our schools.

There are a number of different theories of leadership styles applied in education today. One contingency style of leadership, which has triggered debate amongst scholars, is the path-goal theory wherein its primary aim is to align methodology with circumstances. The application of this theory can lead to a number of improvements in the educational setting which include increased motivation, satisfaction, and capacity. Although this theory has been in existence for more than three decades; scholars argue that it has not been adequately researched. On the contrary, transformational leadership has been widely studied and proven to be effective. The application of this theory involves the leader 1) acting as the moral exemplar 2) building awareness and articulating the vision and 3) improving team capacity. The path-goal theory as well as the transformational leadership theory will be examined in depth in order to determine future implications for educational leaders.

In today's world, there are many different styles of leaderships. All of them are approaches used by individuals, which are based on their values, preferences and beliefs but also on organizational culture and norms which encourage some styles and discourage others. Leadership styles work most efficiently if they are adapted to the demands of the situation, the requirements of the involved people and the challenges facing the organization. There is a difference in ways leaders approach their employees. In the analysis of Coach Knight and of Coach Krzyszewski's leadership types, the authors sketch two successful leaders who were great achievers despite huge differences in their leadership styles. Couch Knight led through intimidation and discipline while Coach K. through positive reinforcement, trust and confidence.

This paper discusses different type of leadership styles. Servant leadership is a leadership that was discovered by Robert K. Greenleaf. Greenleaf founds some key tools on how individuals can serve and be leaders at the same time while being effective. Many organization use this theory in their organizations rather it’s for- profit or non- profit. It will be explored on how organizations use this theory and how it works for them as well as what leadership style is used for my particular organization and how successful that style is compared to the servant leadership style.

Leadership is a milestone that every leader wants to achieve. Leader is the one who encourages others, helps to achieve their dreams without any intervention or pressure. Till this day, one of the most important thing that I have realized is every leader has followers. Followers are the proof that a leader exist. Leadership styles, vision, beliefs, and norms tends to differ from one leader to other. There is nothing to worry about the differences in the leadership styles as leader choose a particular leadership style according to them. There are so many people who wants to be a leader or who come forward to become a leader. But the biggest concern is why isn 't every single interested candidate in the position of the leader. For instance, there are so many big personalities who have contributed to the nation, and some of them have even contributed going beyond it. They feel the problems that others are struggling with and help them by living in another country. To honor those distinct personalities CNN has tried its best to recognize those people and honor them. In this context, among ten capable people CNN chooses a person, it is true that every nominated person deserves a recognition but as time passes by I realized that besides having the leadership skills a leader too should be capable of creating trust. The same concept is with the selection of President. We select the one whom we think has the capability to run the country and is trustworthy. Trust is

Successful leaders typically have the same characteristics; they are dependable, competent, loyal, supportive and they set the example for everyone to see. I think every successful leader follows this philosophy whether they realize it or not. I have worked for several leaders throughout my 21 plus year career and I have seen all different types of leadership styles. I have learned something from every leader I have worked for, whether they were a great leader who I wanted to emulate later on in my career, or the leader that I swore I would never be like. We learn from everyone that we work for, good or bad.

There are several kinds of leadership styles used to facilitate the actions of others. Mirriam-Webster.com defines leadership as “a position as a leader of a group, organization, etc”. Another more inclusive definition regarding the leading role is “managers motivating employees, directing their activities, selecting the most effective communication channels, or resolving conflicts among members” (Robbins, Judge, 2013). If a company or organization suffers from poor, none, or the wrong leadership styles, everyone involved will pay and it can break them. On the other hand, when a company is firing on all cylinders and they have all the right people at the right time leading in the correct form, great things can happen, and that makes all of the difference. According to Air Force Pamphlet 36-2241 (2013), the five main leadership styles are: Laissez-Faire, Management by Exception (Passive), Management by Exception (Active), Transactional Leadership and Contingent Rewards, and lastly Transformational leadership. Each one of these styles broken down, and in different settings may add to or destroy an organization. The definition of each leadership style will be discussed, as well as the pros and cons that each style can have on a company.

Being an effective manager means knowing when to use the right management style. The six management styles are coaching, strategic, laissez- faire, bureaucratic, autocratic, and democratic. Managers have to perform many roles in an organization and knowing how they would handle difficult situations will depend on their style of management. The purpose of the paper is to understand a little about all the management styles and then which one best fits my personality and how it should be handled. Being able to be an effective Manager and knowing when to use it and how to handle a situation when it comes

As the name suggests, situational theory recommends that leaders change their style according to situation and temperament of the follower. There is something different about this theory. It doesn't only focus on the leader characteristics but also takes into account the characteristics of the one being led and that is why it is a better approach for Stephen than Bureaucratic approach used by the local authority.

There are three principle leadership styles. They are Goleman’s providing six management styles for leaders to work more efficiently with followers based on situation (Hoang, 2010) and Blake and Mouton’s in which the combination between the concern for people and for production is presented and result in the effective management style (BPP learning media, 2010). Moreover, the Hersey and Blanchard’s studies how “leaders match their style to the competence and commitment of subordinates” (Hoang, 2012, p.15).