Argument for Capital Punishment Essay

Some people think that the death penalty is unfair. The death penalty is fair because it could make people different around america. The death penalty was used during the middle ages and was successful. The death penalty would also make law figures respected a bit more. It would also make more room in prison.

     One argument from death penalty supporters is that the death penalty acts as a deterrent to prevent other people from committing murders. It is the belief that people will think out the consequences of their actions before murdering, and consider the

Despite this on going argument, outlawing capital punishment in America could create many unhappy citizens, and cause a division in the U.S. government. By enforcing the death penalty prevention in crime could occur. If death is the punishment for murder then criminals are not gaining from their crimes, but receiving the punishment they have inflicted on others. The crime rate is lower in the states that do not invoke capital punishment, but as Walter Burns stated “the number of murders tend to rise with the crime rate in general - and not only in America,” (105). Capital punishment is maintained to hopefully show criminals that when they kill they will eventually meet the same fate. By enforcing the death penalty the government could be trying to scare criminals from their crimes, and in some cases it has worked. When the death penalty was restored in Kansas, for example, the homicide rate dropped considerably (Bedau 122). According to research done by Bedau the crime rate continued to sore between 1960-1969 when capital punishment was rarely being used in most states (Bedau 127).

The death penalty which is also known as capital punishment is the punishment of a crime by execution. (Washington Post 2008: e.data) Such extreme sentences are awarded for very serious crimes such as premeditated murder, multiple murders, repeated crimes, rape and murder and so on, where

Many people are against capital punishment because they think that it is not humane and should not take a human life, most think that because of their religion and their god prohibits them from the taking of another’s life. When a person is about to be put to death there are many protesters on about what is about to happen, because they think it is not the best way to deal with things. I respect their opinions, but I think differently along with many others that think the same way; that the death penalty is effective and should continue to be. My opinion on this is that if your not ready for your life to be taken from you then don’t take a life yourself, as many would say “an eye for an eye” in this case is a life for a life but still the same meaning. I also don’t believe that the death penalty should be applied in many cases, only on the ones involving murder, rape or treason to this country. People might think that you don’t have a heart by thinking this way but what they don’t understand is that we don’t have room in this world for people like that, people that only cause harm to society and that have hurt the victims family, at least that’s what I believe. The one negative thing about the death penalty is that it is expensive, it cost more in the little time

Perhaps most importantly, one must consider the basic ethical question of hypocrisy. We must ask ourselves, "What type of message are we as a nation sending to the rest of the world and to our own citizens when we kill people who kill people to show that it is wrong to kill people?" By executing murderers, we are merely lowering ourselves to their level in order to express our primitive desire for retribution. Our society can never be called moral or democratic if we begin sacrificing individuals, without their consent, to 'the greater good.' Since capital punishment is supposedly intended to protect and avenge innocent lives, it has failed its purpose if, as it undoubtedly has and will, it causes even a few blameless people to be killed. The

Executing murders prevents them from doing it again and it also protects people, in some way is acting in self-defense and that under any circumstances is wrong. Even though the good outweighs the bad it is important to have the necessary evidence to condemn someone of such

While criminals must be punished for their criminal actions, “legalized murder”, as author Coretta Scott King put it, is immoral. The death penalty is legalizing the very thing that many on death row are charged for, murder. There is a multitude of lawful alternatives, to the death penalty, of reestablishing a better reputation for the criminals. The Constitution has no true right to allow such a felonious form of rehabilitation.

The US remains the same company as Iran china and Iraq as the users of capital punishment. I don’t think anyone’s job description should be killing another person that bleeds the same blood as you. Death penalty is lethal raffle. Out of 15000 to homicides every year in US, only about 120 people are punished with death. That’s less than 1% of the people in jail for murder. There has to be a better punishment that can take place for the inmate’s family than just putting an inmate to rest. The families of the murder victims go through trauma and the loss of a loved on. No one should have the power to take someone from their family especially forever. But execution doesn’t help the people redeem are end the pain that you all have caused. The longed process regarding to executions extends the wait that the family waits to hear the bed news. The Families of the murder victim would be better if the money being used now for the expensive process of execution were provided with counseling and assistant. Murder cases cost 1.5 million are more. Paying for prosecution and defense makes the state and counties pay $9 million a year. The death penalty brings civilians lives to a

The death penalty may be costly but, but it’s worth it and that is debatable, because, it cost more to keep an inmate alive that the actually death penalty. Every human life is precious and important and having the death penalty is moral it teaches criminals a lesson or learning experience of how strict laws can be on citizens who have the intent to hurt others. To others it my, seems un-human, but it is called capital punishment for a

In regards to the death penalty, it is my belief that life without parole is better for several reasons. I’m against the death penalty not for the benefit of the criminals but because it doesn’t reduce crime rates, it lengthens the agony experienced by the families of the victims, costs considerably more than life in prison, and, most importantly, risks the deaths of many innocent people. The death penalty ends up being a more tedious process than sentencing someone to life

“Two wrongs don’t make a right” is a saying that a lot of mothers use with their children regarding their actions. This saying also goes hand in hand with the issue of capital punishment. Capital punishment has been a penalty for crimes in the United States since before the Declaration of Independence was created. Some states have abolished this type of penalty for criminals; however, in some states this type of punishment is still completely legal. Many state governments clearly believe that capital punishment is a valid and moral solution for severe crimes committed in their individual state. Capital punishment, however, is completely immoral, and there are a lot of risks that follow this type of penalty. Capital punishment disregards the eighth amendment in the Bill of Rights, it opposes many religious beliefs, it is expensive for taxpayers, and most importantly it creates the possibility of innocent people being penalized for a crime that they did not commit. The death penalty should be made illegal in all states in the United States in order to protect the rights and safety of the citizens.

To begin, the death penalty is not nearly effective as a prisoner who has life in prison without parole. Many prisoners would rather face the death penalty and lose their lives quickly than have to be stuck inside of a confined building for the rest of their lives never being able to be out in the real world again. Some prisoners on their way to death row have made it clear that death row sound more appealing than sitting behind bars for the rest of their lives. The New York Post had a statement

There are always two sides to an argument and when it comes to the death penalty there is no difference. Those who are for the death penalty and are keeping the practice say that the death penalty aids in giving victims’ families peace as well as preventing the perpetrator from doing those despicable crimes again. According to Kyle Gibson in the article Death Penalty Repeal: It 's Necessary to Use Capital Punishment in a Free World the only way for many families to have any peace in their loss is for the perpetrators to die for what they have done. The author also mentions that death many not be enough to stop the pain and help them to move on with their lives (Gibson, Online).

Welcome to America, the land of the free, of the prosperous, of the opulent. America the Beautiful, one of the only places in the world where all citizens regardless of race, background, or social class are constitutionally guaranteed life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness—that is unless you're on death row. In modern day America we are still faced with the antiquated ritual of capital punishment, a practice that interferes directly with the law of the land. The same forms of punishment used during the middle ages are still in effect today, the same ideas that should have been abolished had the U.S. government revised it's penology. Capital punishment is cruel as well as unusual and inadequate for our advanced society. The United