preview

Aristotle's Belief In Determining The Human End

Decent Essays

Aristotle’s belief in ends can be reconciled, at least to an extent, to Christian teaching. God made humans for a purpose and humans can be said to be good when they achieve their God-ordained purpose. Similarly, Aristotle’s emphasis on cultivating good character and his belief that moral actions must be accompanied by good motives also adheres to Christian teaching. However, many critics say that Aristotle’s method for determining the human end is flawed. As apposed to what he believes, it seems inadequate to determine the human end by observing what it is that humans strive after because, since the Fall, every facet of humanity has been corrupted by sin. Consequently, humans often desire and try to attain things that are sinful and that God …show more content…

However, we do not achieve Eudaemonia by actively seeking it out. It is attained through the appropriate ordering and pursuit of appropriate goals, in the right manner. From this it might be said that Eudaemonia is something that is greater than the sum of its parts, and as we don’t seek it, it is something of an additional by-product of conducting our pursuit of all other goods. Similarly exemplified as, studying in university and realizing you have achieved profound personal growth. A further quality of Eudaemonia is that it is desired for itself and not for the sake of some further good. No one tries to live well for the sake of some further good. You try to live well to live well, and there is nothing beyond that. Aristotle’s conception of happiness is not just a mental state, he is asking what is good for human beings and also what it is to be a good human being. In addition, critics have argued that there cannot be a single description for the best sort of life for everyone because there is simply too much variety between people. Based on a direct translation to happiness, Eudaemonia in this sense is relative to different

Get Access