On February 26, 2016, AP closed a markdown case at the Bay St-Bruno store for a value of $75.68. The associate was observed during live surveillance giving unauthorized discount to his friend. Further investigation and also an associate complaint revealed that that associate had forced another associate to give him 2 unauthorized discounts on his personal purchase. During the interview he admitted given and received those unauthorized
The shopkeeper’s privilege does not protect Walmart from liability under the circumstances of the case. Although Navarro had the right to exercise shopkeeper’s privilege, Navarro had not enough evidence to consider Cockrell as a suspect and it is not reasonable that Navarro asked Cockrell to take off the bandage. According to the merchant protection statutes, merchants can stop, detain, and investigate suspected shoplifters without being held liable for false imprisonment if (1) there are reasonable grounds for the suspicion, (2) suspects are detained for only reasonable time, and (3) investigations are conducted in a reasonable manner (Cheeseman, 2015, P.87). Navarro was not fulfilled for the third condition because the investigation is unreasonable on putting the suspect in a risk of death. Since there was a risk of bacterial infection and it may cause death after the wound area exposed under the air, Navarro should
On 04/26/16 APM Orlando interview Mr. Nichols with the store manager Christopher Frazier as a witness. Mr. Nichols stated that he was aware of the policy and that under no circumstances we should get into a physical altercation with shoplifters. Mr. Nichols stated that the reason why he attempted to stop the individual, who he suspected of stealing newspaper, is because;
Officers responded to North Scott Hall to investigate the report of a 19 year old male UW Oshkosh student checking in with an odor of marijuana on him. The male admitted to smoking marijuana and drinking alcoholic beverages. He was warned for Use of Marijuana and cited for Underage Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages (2nd offense).
Estrela advised me that Walmart did not want to press charges against the defendant the second time he exited the store and concealed several items in his clothing. Estrela stated "We detained him before he actually exited all poins of sale the second time." Estrela advised me that Walmart did want to pursue criminal charges for the fraudulent return.
An analysis of the issues in Winn Parish reveals that there is a major drug problem plaguing the area and raising the death toll. The Winn Parish Enterprise, the local newspaper, shows a huge increase in the amount of drug bust and drug arrest. Every week the arrest report is full of drug related criminal activity. Students are being sent to school with drugs in hopes of selling these items to their classmates. Families are being destroyed by drug overdose. What has been the cause of this increase?
Find and discuss a British Columbia case that discusses and applies and/or interprets the Builders Lien Act. In your discussion be sure to summarize the salient facts, identify the issues before the Court, the arguments of each of the parties and provide a summary of the decision.
In the evening of September 20, 2003 four friends chose to eat at Chili’s Grill and Bar and at the end of their meal they received their bill of $56 dollars and made a decision to walk out without paying their tab. A regular at the restaurant noticed this decision and chose to walk out of the restaurant and follow the four friends with his white unmarked vehicle. Once the friends noticed they had someone following behind them they stopped into a Best Buy parking lot where they were then confronted by the gentleman. The gentleman proceeded to tell the friends that he noticed what happened and they would not get away with their action. The friends drove off and soon after a high-speed pursuit emerged and ended with the friends wrecking their vehicle. In a short amount of time after the incident occurred the friends decided to sue Chili’s Grill and Bar for damages that occurred from the pursuit from the unmarked gentleman.
On 09/22/16 I AP Associate Vanessa McClary was informed by CSM Vondra Bradley of a $100 cash shortage, which occurred on 09/20/16 in store 648 between the times of 4:31 pm and 8:39 pm on register 10. Mrs. Bradley also provided me with a journal. After receiving the journal I made my way to the AP office where I began to review video for this shortage. At approx. 6:56 pm I observed cashier Shanice Ellis ringing a customer out on register 10. The customer's total came to $97.74. When it was time for a form of payment the customer used a Debit card, the customer also asked for $200 cash back. While observing Mrs. Ellis removing cash from the til I took notice of the fact that she removed cash from the compartment where the 100's and 50's are
Urban Outfitters inappropriately handled this crisis because the company maintained that this controversy was only a misunderstanding, and therefore lied to the public about the initial motivation to sell this unethical product. As a matter of fact, Urban Outfitters justified its choice of selling this “one of a kind” Kent state sweatshirt instead of apologizing sincerely. According to the company the red color and holes on the sweatshirt are “discoloration from the original shade of the shirt and the holes are from natural wear and fray”. In this case, the firm minimized its responsibly by denning its initial intend that “it was never our intention to allude to the tragic events”. The retailer asserted that the connection with the Kent State shooting was a coincidence. “Our
I need clarification on PO 129159. The PO was issued to Vendor 4018, Elite Comfort Solutions, LLC, with a remit to address of P. O. Box 73949, Newnan, GA 30271. The invoice on this order was issued by Elite Foam, Inc., with a different remit to address of P. O. Box 300072, Duluth, GA 30096-0030. I don’t have sufficient information to know the relationship between the two company to determine if these companies are the same or should be separate vendors in our system. Form the W9 information, Elite Comfort Solutions is a single member LLC, and Elite Foam is a Corporate.
Why did Amy classify the shift leaders as exempt? Are there any advantages to Jones Department Store to having the shift leaders classified as exempt?
On December 19, 2015, AP closed an internal merchandise theft case at the Bay Brossard value at $33.00. AP observed an associate select a tie and removed the price tags and then put the tie on to wear. The associate put the tickets at the cash register but did not pay for the tie. The associate exited at the end of the day still wearing the unpaid for tie.
As a Weingarten employee, Collins was represented under a collective bargaining agreement by a local union. After an account that Collins was taking money from the cash register, a Weingarten private investigator spent two days witnessing the store without the knowledge of the manager. After completing the investigation, the P.I. advised the store
Built upon an assessment of the situation analysis phase of planning, taking into consideration of the visitor markets, the operating environment, the resource capacity, the existing products, the experiences and the statutory and planning environment. Clipper Bay as a destination with relatively low market share should embrace best practices to which realign to their strategic focus following an extensive research into possible new visitor growth markets and consumer needs.
The legal fees amount of RM 500 is cost associated with issuing bond and should be recorded as “deferred charges” which is an asset analogous to prepaid