preview

Brown vs. Topeka Challenged Segregation within Education Essay example

Better Essays

A landmark case entered the United States Supreme Court in 1954 Brown v Topeka educational school board. The case challenged the idea of accepting segregation within educational facilities. , Brown was heralded as the triumph over legal barriers to better educational opportunities for African American children Brown v Topeka was a watershed case in the United States that challenged past precedents, shook the race relations in society, and perpetuated an extraordinary drive in the United States for change, which eventually sparked the civil rights movement. Brown is often regarded among the most monumental decisions ever rendered by the United States Supreme Court. Its legacy includes a body of case law affecting the shape and Meaning of …show more content…

Roberts v. the City of Boston case of 1849. After the school board refused to make an effort to initiate desegregation plan The Roberts v. City of Boston decision later reappeared and was cited in Plessey v. Ferguson Supreme Court case. The case that set a precedent for separate but equal facilities and laid the legal bases for the separate but equal doctrine was Plessey v. Ferguson. Plessey was an African American in the southern half of the United States. Plessey was an avid user of railroads. However, Plessey believed that the segregation of blacks amongst train coaches was unconstitutional and violated the 14th amendment. Plessey’s case went through the American judicial system and eventually ended in the United States Supreme court. The justice of the time interpreted the amendment and believed that segregation was not violating the constitution. The Supreme courts justices set the precedent for the separate but equal doctrine which was used as a basis to allow for segregation in the united states even though it was a charter violation. The case of Plessy v. Ferguson, in 1896, established the principle of separate-but-equal, which claimed that segregated facilities did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment as long as they were equal. The ruling established separate

Get Access