preview

Cherokee Removal Dbq

Decent Essays

In 1830, gold was found in Western Georgia. Unfortunately, The Cherokee had lots of land there. Settlers ignored that and began to invade western Georgia. President Andrew Jackson then decided to sign the Indian Removal Act, because he believed that assimilation wouldn’t work. This act gave him power to order the removal of any tribe at any time. In 1835, The Treaty of New Echota was signed, which said that the Cherokee would leave their land and walk to Oklahoma. They refused to leave so after two years, they were forced out. Andrew Jackson and the U.S. Government had many reasons for the removal of the Cherokee people, but the Cherokee also had many reasons for why it shouldn’t have happened. Eventually, their removal had devastating effects on the Cherokee culture. The U.S. Government had many reasons or why the Cherokee removal was a good idea. One reason was even though Major Ridge, the Cherokee who signed the Treaty of New Echota, had no legal right to sign it, they still had a Cherokee signature (Exhibit J). They said Major Ridge claimed he represented all Cherokee when he only represented about 2000 Cherokee. Another good reason for the removal was that moving would likely save the Cherokee’s culture. If they stayed, they …show more content…

One reason was that the Cherokee law stated that no Chiefs would meet with any U.S. commissioners to make a Treaty regarding land (Exhibit F). Major Ridge was a Cherokee who signed the Treaty of New Echota, but he wasn’t a chief. This meant he could technically sign the Treaty, but his signature still wouldn’t count because the Cherokee Constitution stated that the General Council had sole power in constructing treaties (Exhibit E). Major Ridge was a part of the Council, but he went behind everyone’s back. He didn’t have any permission to sign the Treaty (John Ross Quote), which is why the removal never should’ve

Get Access