Living Under One Civil Liberty
Imagine having to choose just one of the civil liberties. Would you be able to choose just one when there are so many that we need and use on the daily? All of the civil liberties save us a lot of everyday stress but if I had to choose just one, I would choose the second amendment, that states, “a well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Reason being is because the rate in the city has had a dramatic increase in the last fourth months, FBI says 19 percent increase for violent crimes and 5 percent for property crimes. There has been more violent crimes than property crimes but I believe everyone should have the right to protect themselves and only in the sense of protection. In 1939 the court adopted a collective rights approach, determining that congress could regulate a sawed-off shot gun that had moved in interstate commerce under the national firearms act of 1934 because the evidence did not suggest that the shot gun “has some reasonable relationship to the preservation of efficiency of a well-regulated militia. It may have taken a couple of tries to pass this law, but there were regulations which ban weapons on government property, regulations which ban the illegal possession of a hand gun as a
…show more content…
I am a firm believer in letting others defend themselves because there is a lot of people in the world who no remorse for a human beings life. I also believe that self-defense should never be tried in court, no one should have to go through legal actions for trying to save their own lives since the person that put their life in danger didn’t think twice about putting that individual in danger or taking their life away. I highly doubt that the crime rate raising would stop but where would we be if no one could protect or
One of the biggest arguments against gun control is that it does not prevent criminals from committing violent crimes, such as murder. Based on information gathered by Argesti and Smith, this A Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) study showed that when a handgun ban was put in effect in Washington D.C. “the murder rate averaged 73% higher than it was at the outset of the law” (Argesti and Smith). Another report from the FBI showed that when Florida and Texas implemented a right-to-carry law, their murder rates dropped by 30 and 36 percent (qtd. in Argesti and Smith). It is blatantly obvious that areas with high crime will continue to have the same level of crime, even after the implementation of stricter gun control laws.
The second amendment was put in place to prevent a government that turns against the country and we have the right to fight back. A lot of people think that the second amendment needs to be altered but in the fine print it says "shall not be infringed". The first 10 amendments, otherwise known as the bill of rights, set the guidelines of our country. These first ten should never change and we should enforce them rather than complain about them.
During the next few years the Bill of Rights began to be accepted by the
From the beginning, the United States Constitution has guaranteed the American people civil liberties. These liberties have given citizens rights to speak, believe, and act freely. The Constitution grants citizens the courage to express their mind about something they believe is immoral or unjust. The question is, how far are citizens willing to extend the meanings of these liberties? Some people believe that American citizens take advantage of their civil liberties, harming those around them. On the contrary, many other people feel that civil liberties are necessary tools to fight for their Constitutional rights.
"If the fires of freedom and civil liberties burn low in other lands, they must be made brighter in our own. If in other lands the press and books and literature of all kinds are censored, we must redouble our efforts here to keep them free. If in other lands the eternal truths of the past are threatened by intolerance, we must provide a safe place for their perpetuation." Franklin Delano Roosevelt, 1938 (Isaacs 66)
The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the right of the people to possess armaments for their own defense—this is one of the biggest conservative ideology arguments that the anti-gun control side stands by. In addition, banning handguns prevents people from an effective means of
The American constitution recognizes the right to keep arms for defense of person and property as a privilege or immunity that cannot be abridged by the states. The Glucksberg test recognizes the right to keep arms for defense of person and property as a privilege or immunity that cannot be abridged by the states. The 2nd Amendment is unnecessary for applying this right to the states through the Privileges or Immunities Clause. 1: The Right to keep and Bear Arms in Defense of Person and Property Is Deeply Rooted in our Nation’s History and Tradition. Glucksberg Step 2: Describing the Right to Keep and Bear Arms in Defense of Person and Property. Knowing we have the right to own guns is important to those who stand with the 2nd Amendment. If owing a gun makes you feel
Civil Liberties and Civil Rights are two terms that are often used interchangeably in America. Since the founding of our nation there has always been the debate of the limit of government and what rights were guaranteed to each individual. Many of the architects of our government feared that national government could one day become too powerful and begin to infringe on the individual rights of the citizens. As a result, a Bill of Rights was added to our constitution. The Bill of Rights serves as a guide of what the government cannot do. Civil Liberties simply establish precedent on what rights the United States government cannot abridge on. Civil Rights, on the other hand applies to the rights of individuals. Over the history of our nation the question of civil rights has found itself becoming a pillar of our legal system and has been very instrumental in our quest to become a “more perfect union”. In recent history one civil liberty that has caused a continual controversial debate is the second amendment, in addition to how it applies to gun control measures that are being proposed in order to decrease the level of mass shootings. The second amendment clearly defines the intention of individuals to have the right to bear arms. In order to understand why gun control advocates have failed to secure effective gun control legislation, we must explore the reasoning why the second amendment is interpreted the way it is and should Americans be allowed to own guns?
Our Founding Founders established the federal government with three distinct branches, each with powers over the other in order to have a proper checks and balances to ensure fairness across the board. The U.S. Constitution outlines the powers and responsibilities of the three branches of government and is a critical document for the federal government. Important laws and documents such as The Bill of Rights, The US Civil Rights Act and The Freedom of Information Act (FoIA) are managed by our Constitution. Below we will discuss three subjects which set up a diverse broad range of viewpoints that are essential in our democracy.
1. 2 Define Civil Liberties; then define Civil Rights. How are they similar? How do they differ? Which civil sequence has more influence on your life as you know it to be now? Why do you believe this to be so?
part in todays lessons plan. Also should be parents aware, that not talking to your
What is the 1st amendment? It is what keeps the nation whole, it gives us americans our voice. In the first amendment, it gave us three rights. The amendment gave us the freedom from religion, the freedom of speech and the freedom press. The freedom is a big part of the united states. If we didn't have freedom of religion there would be a whole lot of chaos going around. In arkansas every block has a different church for a different part of a religion. Lets face it with over a billion people in the united states their is no way we could all be under one religion. With immigrants coming into america it doesn't just bring them but their religion too. But we didn’t always be allowed to get our voice out, thanks to the 1st
“A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” The second amendment to the United States constitution could be the most important of all the amendments, because without the right to bear arms, it is very possible that we would still be part of the British empire. Without the colonists, right to keep and bear arms, the militia would have never been possible and we surely would have lost the revolutionary war.
There are numerous news television and sites which display stories of people demanding, fighting, or proclaiming their rights. Yet, the question of what it means come into play and whether these people are understanding the First Amendment. Knowing the difference between civil liberties and civil rights contributes to the knowledge of power and seeking what is entitled to a person. This interconnects with the idea of being knowledgeable about the Ten Amendments to the Constitution, referred to as the Bill of Rights (We the People). It is of great importance to know the five aspects of the First Amendment because one can better understand what has been lawfully entitled them and what limits and affect their rights.
1. Discuss when, why and how the Cold War began. Then cite at least one factor that perpetuated the Cold War in each decade from the 1950s-1980s and discuss how the item you selected affected America at home as well. Last, discuss when and why the Cold War ended.