Communication Styles in Negotiation
Introduction
Communication styles in negotiation are probably one of the most important skills or characteristics one will develop over a lifetime. From the point a human being begins to develop cognitive skills, the process of learning and understanding situations become more apparent. One will learn from a very young age the dynamics and characteristics of communication and its role in negotiation. To better understand the communication process, one must be able to recognize how they communicate, whether it is on an assertive, aggressive, passive, or passive-aggressive level of communication. The manner in which one conveys his/her message is critical, and the many methods in which they do it is
…show more content…
In Negotiation fifth edition, threats are defined by five linguistic dimensions: polarizing, immediacy, intensity, lexical diversity, and high-power language style. Polarizing language is the choice of words when describing ones position to make it appear positive and the use of negative words when describing an opponent’s side. Verbal immediacy is the measurement given through vocabulary that lets the recipient of the message know the level of urgency affiliated with the message. Immediacy can be either high or low depending on whether one wants to engage or distance oneself from the other party. Language intensity identifies how strong one feels about the situation through use of vocabulary. Possible results of language intensity are either high or low depending on the level of feelings one wants to portray to the opposing party. Lexical diversity is the degree of vocabulary that one uses. Holding a rich vocabulary gives the impression of competence, while possessing a low level of lexical diversity gives the impression of inexperience. Last, the extent of a high-powered language style means the manner in which one uses language as the means of being effective. Using a low power language style is identified by politeness and hesitations; while using a high power language style is recognized by verbal dominance and clarity. Therefore
The negotiations class was an insightful experience. It helped me attain a better understanding of my strengths and weaknesses both personally and professionally. It helped put into perspective a lot of my theoretical analysis conducted on group dynamics and, most importantly, has helped me become a more effective negotiator. My goal with this paper is to communicate the evolution of my negotiation skills during the progression of the course.
Negotiation is a fundamental form of dispute resolution involving two or more parties (Michelle, M.2003). Negotiations can also take place in order to avoid any future disputes. It can be either an interpersonal or inter-group process. Negotiations can occur at international or corporate level and also at a personal level. Negotiations often involve give and take acknowledging that there is interdependence between the disputants to some extent to achieve the goal. This means that negotiations only arise when the goals cannot be achieved independently (Lewicki and Saunders et al., 1997). Interdependence means the both parties can influence the outcome for the other party and vice versa. The negotiations can be win-lose or win-win in nature.
Negotiation occurs on a regular basis in a daily life and individuals negotiate in business occasions or outside of the workplace. Having superior negotiation skills is conductive to the success in personal life and career development. This essay will indicate that my natural preferences for different influencing tactics, comparisons between theory and practice, and a personal action plan to improve negotiation skills based on the role-play activity in my class.
Negotiation is one of the most common approaches used to make decisions and manage disputes. It is also the major building block for many other alternative dispute resolution procedures. According to Christopher W (2012), negotiation is the principal way that people redefine an old relationship that is not working to their satisfaction or establish a new relationship where none existed before. Because negotiation is such a common problem-solving process, it is in everyone 's interest to become familiar with negotiating dynamics and skills. This section is designed to identify what worked well and not well in the negotiation. In addition, to present strategies that generally makes the negotiation more efficient and improvement in the next
Negotiation is one important part of both the professional and personal life in our everyday situations. It is critical for people to resolve disputes, distribute limited resources, and/or create something new that neither party could achieve on his or her own. Negotiations can range from coordinating project timelines with clients to asking for a raise to discussing holiday plans with family members.
The negotiation style that I will consider in discussing the expenses related to maintaining quality patient care with the Chief Financial Officer (CFO) of my organization is the PN using its four basic points. Utilization of effective communication and active listening are important parts of negotiating skills. The first step is to separate the people from the problem, the issue here is the cost of maintaining quality of care. You need to understand that you and your CFO might have differing set of interests such as you may want to add more nursing staff to reach your goal, but your CFO is looking at maintaining the cost and at the same time provide quality of care by working smarter. The second step is to focus on
Whether it is at work, church or in our private relationships, negotiations are a necessary tool for reaching an agreement. They are made by discussing each parties point of view with the aim being to reach an agreement that is mutually beneficial. For the most part, negotiation is the process by which those people involved successfully adopt or abandon their respective position through the use of positional bargaining. There are different types of approaches for the negotiation process - some hard and others soft in their manner of approach. The desired outcome of
In order to make improvements in one’s negotiating skills, it is necessary to determine one’s current communication skills and negotiating style. The use of tools, such as The Personal Bargaining Inventory and Communication Competence Scale questionnaires can assist one in determining these skills. Developing an improvement plan, taking into consideration the five negotiating strategies, ten best practices of negotiating skills, and current communication skills and negotiating style will provide one with a tool to assist in improving one’s negotiating skills.
Developing a Successful Negotiating Style, because this is was the fourth case in the course, and since I believe I did a good job in the last negotiation, I was confident that my personal collaborate style has flowered. However, being the IAA team, I faced a problem of how to present this case to the other party. I could not come up with a decent plan to overcome the sociological barrier that came with the employment contracts. Thus, my style in the negotiation was more of a compromiser style, which I believe was a setback for me.
Where possible prepare in advance. Consider what your needs are and what the other person 's are. Consider outcomes that would address more of what you both want. Commit yourself to a win/win approach, even if tactics used by the other person seem unfair. Be clear that your task will be to steer the negotiation in a positive direction. To do so you may need to do some of the following:
A negotiation is a communication method in which several parties talk over problems and endeavor to solve them via discussion in order to reach a resolution (Lewicki, Barry, & Saunders, 2011). Negotiations occur regularly on micro and macro scales, both in the professional or personal which could be at the office and or in everyday life. Your approach and style can make the different between a make or break deal. If attaining an agreement in a negotiation is based on collaboration and collaboration is based on trust, then to be an effective negotiator you need to spawn trust between yourself and the other party. Trust comes from being natural and being yourself, not from trying to be something you’re not, a fake. Once you’re aware of your negotiation style you know what can realistically be improved and what can’t. The purpose of this paper is to outline my findings from reflective questionnaires and to compile a plan to improve on my negotiation skills.
Negotiation is an important and vital skill in today’s modern world. In the famous words of John F. Kennedy, “Let us never negotiate out of fear. But let us never fear to negotiate” (Kennedy). Our words hold a great deal of power, and how we use them is important as well. Through negotiation, common ground can be discovered and uncovered, making strives for a better future.
There are two main cultures involved in the negotiation process. The Japanese and French culture. The Japanese is a face culture that emphasis on the interests of the collective, relative, to those of the individual. Face cultures are very hierarchical structures and the fundamental group is the family. Japanese view conflict as violations of duties and obligations. In a face culture once an agreement for its complications for roles and responsibilities has been reached, the relationship is likely to be very stable. When face cultures analyze a problem, they focus on the problem and the context that might have caused the problem, and based on experienced knowledge. On the other hand, the French culture is consider to be an honor culture, this means the culture generally hierarchical social structures, they respond to insult with aggressively and protect their self-worth. The honor culture is to be trustworthy, putting your self-worth in hand of others. In the negotiation, honor culture tend to be more analytic thinking and are influenced by
Given that culture is an integral component of cross national borders, it is important to be versed with its impact on business negotiation. In a world where people are connected given the developments in information, communication and technology, global business that greatly involves negotiation, has resulted in a case where citizens, governments and institutions take part in cross-border interactions. This paper seeks to analyze aspects of negotiation in intercultural environments especially the multiculturalism in Australia, and to analyze how they influence styles of negotiation.
Negotiation is all about a strategy. The end result is usually to end a problem that someone is having, whether it is personally or