The Marxism theory views society as being in conflict between the ruling classes and working classes which is entirely beneficial for the ruling classes. The Marxism theory of social class will be outlined and then compared and contrasted with the Postmodernism and Functionalism theories on social class.
The Marxist perspective views society as capitalist based and with two classes: The bourgeoisie who are the ruling class that have power of influence and own and control the land, means of production and capital. The ruling class control and exploit the working class proletariat who do not have any influence, own or control land, the means of production or capital. The result is continual conflict as the proletariat is reliant on the
…show more content…
Functionalism also believes society is meritocratic and with a value consensus in which there is agreement with society’s norms, values and hierarchical system, and therefore harmonious. This perspective conflicts with the Marxist theory of conflict and inequality as Functionalism states that we as a society with the value consensus theory agree with the inequality of wealth and power, and that positions in society such as teachers, doctors and charity fundraisers compared to bankers, politicians and royalty are rewarded fairly upon society agreement which is …show more content…
“A wider distribution of wealth due to globalization has resulted in class mobilization with changing politics to reflect changing society based on non-class issues such as women’s rights and more recently human rights” Pakulski & Waters, (1966). This means that Postmodernism discount the Functionalism and Marxism explanations for social inequality based on class as being out of date and not relevant in today’s society.
Functionalism differs to the Postmodernism and Marxism comparison that holds the view that the information fed to society by the media, government and education system is edited and controlled. Functionalism believe the information being fed is due to the value consensus of agreement in society, however Postmodernism believe it is due to the individual choice of the institution to boost capitalism and personal objectives and Marxism to instil bourgeoisie enforced norms and values.
Postmodernism believe that we live
Functionalists believe that society is based on a value consensus into which society socialises its members, which enables to cooperate harmoniously and meet society’s needs and goals.
Moreover, Societies are held together by both consensus with values and coercion. The functionalist view is that the balance of harmony among the society is held up by societal institutions. For example, schools, church and family are seen as the most significant foundation for an adequately functional society.
Although quite different, both Functionalism and Marxism have their similarities. They also have their positive and negative aspects and ways in which each theory dysfunctions. Functionalism is the study of society as a functioning system including interdependent institutions or patterned relations that are steady overtime, and that enact specialized functions for the whole. The main focus is on how direction is kept between parts of society. Any given pattern of relations or structures within society is interpreted by reference to the results or functions that such patterns have for them majority. It is an essential assumption within the functionalist perspective is that participation in social systems is voluntary. When a sociologist uses
Functionalism is based on the view that society is a system of interdependent parts held together by a shared culture or value consensus (agreement) amongst individuals as to what values or norms are important in society. Therefore they take a positive view of the education system. As item A suggests they see it as a form of secondary socialism essential to maintaining society i.e. the values and norms transmitted by social institutions and groups which build upon those learnt in the family (primary socialism).
Functionalism is a macro system theory which sees society as a mega structure of linked social institutions such as school, family and the legal system. Each different institution is functional to ensure the whole of society is maintained. For example primary socialisation takes place within the home where children are taught basic life
The Functionalist theory believes that society functions so that each individual plays a specific role. Their perspective of social inequality is the belief that "inequality is not only inevitable but also necessary for the smooth functioning of society."
Functionalism looks at society in aspects of how it contributes to the steadiness/cohesion of the whole society (Anderson, Taylor, & Logio, P. 18). There are many institutions that are looked at that include the economic system, government, education, religion, health care, and family. All of which have different roles and perform different functions to ensure that society operates in a well-ordered manner. An example of this would be how family reproduces, takes care of children, exposes children to culture and heritage, supports other family members, and shares life experiences. Shared values and social stability are keys to this perspective. When this system breaks down it is because people’s needs are not being covered and shared values are deteriorating. When this occurs, it affects all parts of functionalism and the society must achieve
Karl Marx developed his theory on class division by suggesting that all societies have two major classes, a ruling class and a subject class. The ruling class owned a means of production such as land or capital, whereas the subject class did not. Marx argued that this leads to the ruling class exploiting the subject class. The ruling class use a superstructure of the legal and political systems to justify its position and prevent protests by the subject class. In capitalist societies the main classes are the bourgeoisie (capitalist) and the proletariat (working class). In these societies the bourgeoisie exploits the working class through wage labour. The capitalists pay wages to the workers, but make a profit because they pay the workers less than the value of what they produce. Capitalism is the newest type of class society but it will also be the last. Eventually it will be replaced by a communist society in which the means of production
Marxism tries to explain things by look at the world differently, the purpose is to look at the existence of a world or of forces beyond the natural world around us, and the society we live in. It looks for concrete, scientific, logical explanations of the world. The Marxist theory developed when Karl Marx and his friend Frederich Engels wrote The Communist Manifesto in 1848, focuses on class in societies, Marxism attempts to change the world while other philosophies look to merely understand it. Marx wanted to better understand how so many people could be in poverty in a world where there is so much wealth. His answer was simple: capitalism.
According to Naiman (2012), functionalism is a sociological framework that compares society to an organism with interrelated and important parts that lead to the collective entity of society. Each element is considered to have an equally important function within society that ensures its survival (Naiman, 2012). In order to do so, all of the interconnected parts of society must work together in harmony (Naiman, 2012). However, it is also important to note that while certain functional elements within society, such as war, can be beneficial they are by no means inevitable or ideal to the individuals within the society (Naiman, 2012).
Functionalism is consensus theory in sociology. Society based on Functionalism theory was defined as a system of interconnected institutions such as family,
After maintaining many obstacles and hardships, the proletarians began to form itself into a class and political party. Purely from population, the proletarians summoned great political strength. Requiring help, the bourgeois slowly drew the proletarians into the political arena where they would eventually flourish. The bourgeois “…furnishes the proletarians with weapons for fighting the bourgeois. Because the proletarians owned little individual property, they sought out to destroy the individual property system that had oppressed them. By representing the majority of the population, the proletarians caused a chain of events that would make it “evident, that the bourgeois is unfit any longer to be the ruling class in society…” This is clear when the slave-holder (the bourgeois), is unable to sustain the existence of its slave (the proletarians).
Karl Marx came up later with a theory of a classless society to help the working class fight back. Marx came up with many radical ideas to change the way society was proceeding socially which, caused him to be banished from his native land in Germany and then from France, eventually he ended up in England. (Compton's Encyclopedia, 121) Karl Marx believed that social conflict was needed for society to function. He showed people not to be scared of conflict but rather to except it as a way of life. Karl Marx believes that people have a "class consciousness" which means that people are aware of differences between one another and that it causes a separation between groups of people. People mostly look at material objects for a sense of class status. If you are wealthy in life then you have many material objects and if you are poor then you have very little. People need to be educated in order to move up in society, which is why the working class people rarely have a chance to be very successful. Karl Marx realized that the working class deserved more then they were receiving and he tried to help the situation. Marx wanted the wealthy people and the poor to become more economically equal in status. Karl Marx also discusses the economic issues that the working class faces with change. With capitalism growing there is a greater need for production in the factories. More products need to be produced and at
Nevertheless,functionalists who see the solution to the problem of social order in terms of value consensus,have been strongly criticized.Their critics argue that consensus is assumed rather than shown to exist.Secondly,the stability of society may owe more to the absence,rather that the presence of value consensus.They described society in
Functionalist theory is one of the major theoretical perspectives in sociology. It can be argued that the functionalist theory has made a significant contribution to the study of society. It originates from the work of Emile Durkheim who suggests that social order is possible and society remains stable due to the functioning of several institutions. Everything has a specific function in society and society will always function in harmony. The main institutions studied by functionalism are the family, the education system, religion and crime and deviance.