preview

What Is The Tone Of Channel Frights Of War

Decent Essays

World War 1 was a horrific scene, blood and death everywhere, dreadful gun shots sounded all around, and bodies, one by one, fell. Frankly, it was not a place anyone would like to be at the time. During the four-year war, over nine million people were killed and more than 21 million individuals were injured. There are many forms of descriptions and explanations, all over the internet and even in libraries, of the war, however, William Butler Yeats and Thomas Hardy’s poems are very well written and descriptive works describing the combat. Throughout both poems, “Channel Firing” and “The Second Coming,” the frights of war are explored, however, Hardy has a more humorous tone and wrote about the war three months before it occurred, while Yeats tone is rather sinister, and was written after war took place.
As said before, Hardy’s and Yeats poems, both, explore the terrors of war, however, they were written at different times and in different tones. Time, to go farther into depth, Thomas Hardy wrote “Channel Firing” in the year of 1914, which is the year …show more content…

Tone, there are several tones that could have been used in these poems, however, Hardy chose a more humorous tone and Yeats chose a menacing one. Almost completely opposite, most people would think these poems had nothing to do with each other, however, their central message, World War 1, are the same. Notice how Hardy says, ““Ha, ha. It will be warmer when / I blow the trumpet (if indeed / I ever do; for you are men, / And rest eternal sorely need)”(Hardy). Hardy laughs, giving his poem a humorous tone, while Yeats poem has a more ominous tone. Yeats uses words that give off negative connotations, such as “blood-dimmed”(Yeats), “darkness”(Yeats), “slouches”(Yeats), and “troubles”(Yeats). It is obvious to see that these words are not used in a jokey tone, but rather a more sinister

Get Access