Chapter-1 Introduction to Corporate Governance 1.1 Introduction Corporate Governance is a buzz word in the business world. It is envisioned to enhance the accountability of a concern and to evade huge disasters before they occur. The concept of corporate governance dived to global attention after the sudden crashes of Enron, World Com, Xerox, Lehman Brothers, Parmalat, Satyam etc. The failure of these colossal business houses horrified the corporate world with their unethical and unlawful operations which affected the employment, finances of national and local government worldwide and international economy. The history of these scandals have forced all the corporates to have substantial and clear record of wealth creation and transparency over a period of time. Integration and globalization of financial markets and a gush of corporate scams have led to the fast developments within the field. With the continuous growth in the foreign investments in India, the international investors would assert that the corporations in which they have interest should follow a “Code of Corporate Governance”. In such a scenario, Indian corporates cannot afford to disregard the best corporate governance practices since India is a developing country. Corporate Governance has, of course been a highly debated field of enquiry with in the finance discipline for decades. Several studies emanating from academic and non-academic circles over the years demonstrate that better corporate
Corporate governance defined as the system of rules, practices and processes by which a company is directed and controlled. Balancing the interests of the stakeholders is essential involves in a company, which include its shareholders, management, customers, suppliers, financiers, government and community. There are five major elements of corporate governance, which are, board commitment, good board practices, functional and effective control environment, transparent disclosure, and well defined shareholder rights. To prevent corporate scandals, fraud and the criminal liability of the organization, good executed corporate governance is important and must apply and respect in the organization. There have a relationship between corporate governance and internal control, for example, the more in corporate governance, the more of internal control in the organization and the less of fraud occur. One of the tasks and goals of the corporate governance is to ensure there have adequate internal control within organization to protect the organization from any conflicts for the benefits of
Corporate governance in itself has no single definition but common principles which it should follow. For example in 1994 the most agreed term for corporate governance was “the process of supervision and control intended to ensure that the company’s management acts in accordance with the interest of shareholders” (Parkinson, 1994)1. Corporate governance code is not a direct set of rules but a self-regulated framework which businesses choose to follow. This code has continued to change in the past 20 years in accordance with what is happening in the business world. For example the Enron scandal caused reform in corporate governance with the Higgs Report which corrected the issues which were necessary. Although it does not quickly fix problems, it gives a better framework to
Phenomenal growth of interest in corporate governance has emerged in recent years. The body of literature on the subject has grown markedly in response to successive waves of large corporate failures. Furthermore, there have been numerous attempts to define what constitutes ‘good corporate governance’ and to provide guidelines in order to enhance the quality of corporate governance.
ITC Ltd.’s strategy plan for compliance with the current acceptable standards or norms relative to social responsibility today is well thought out, especially for a company that sells potentially dangerous products, and try to meet and listen to all demands and laws in place since the start of their business. Even though in 2014 a new bill was passed for the majority of companies to build accountability and also have the government looking over the private sector (Banerjee, 2013). “The CSR provision requires affected companies to spend at least 2 percent of their average net profits made in the preceding three years on CSR” (Banerjee, 2013). Even though this bill has caused a lot of uproar for companies, ITC has actually already been
Kluyver, C. (2013). A primer on corporate governance (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Business Expert Press.
The Oxford English Dictionary defines ‘governance’ as ‘the act, manner, fact or function of governing, sway, control’. ‘To govern’ is ‘to rule with authority’, ’to exercise the function of government’, ‘to sway, rule, influence, regulate, determine’, ‘to conduct oneself in some way; curb, bridle (one’s passions, oneself)’, or ‘to constitute a law for’.
The need for clarification on the board requirements for a majority of independent directors as it relates to corporate governance is of great importance and would be discussed in this write up.
This was a very interesting article, in my opinion it brings to mind the derived phrase, which came first the chicken or the egg. Meaning, is corporate governance an attempt to control the results of unethical practices of corporations or is it meant to deter them. In reading this article, it is clear that certain corporations practiced unethical business behaviors for self-interest, but the questions this author have are: 1. Should corporate governance be regulated by the legislature as well as the organization and to what degree, 2. Is corporate governance, there to protect the shareholder or the stakeholder, 3. How effective is corporate governance on a global level. The need for a governance system is based on the assumption that the separation between the owners of a company and its management provides self-interest executives the opportunity to take actions that benefit themselves, with the cost of these actions borne by the owners (Larcker & Tayan, 2008).
In the light of various corporate scandals, regulatory bodies and corporate governance were placed under pressure by shareholders and stakeholders to form a tighter grip in governing corporation’s conduct. The obligations, roles and responsibilities of company’s stewards are under scrutiny of Corporations Act, listing rules, country’s code of corporate governance, ethics as well as social standards.
Corporate governance refers to ‘the ways suppliers of finance to corporations assure themselves of getting return on their investment’ (Shleifer and Vishny, 1997: 736). Corporate governance discusses the set of systems, principles and processes by which a
For the purpose of this report, corporate governance is defined as the relationship that exists between company management, stakeholders and the board. Objectives of the company are usually set, attained and monitored through the structure corporate governance provides. (Balgobin 2008).The Guyana Corporate Code of Governance is similar to the UK codes of corporate governance and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD 2004).These principles serve as a reference point that can be used by companies to develop their own frameworks for corporate governance that reflect their own circumstances or situations.
The rise and fall of the Royal Bank of Scotland is characterized by poor corporate governance which allowed for the complete dominance of the executive management over the board of directors and a massive principal-agent problem. Positive social dynamics and the power of weak ties allowed for compliance while intimidation and bullying tactics silenced questions, concerns and opposition. The board’s utter compliancy and borderline negligence enabled rampant, unchecked empire-building at the cost of shareholder value and led to a spiral of unaccountability and gross incompetence. Stakeholders’ loss of confidence from misinformation and misdirection was an inevitability that sealed
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE................................................................. 7 2.1.1. Corporate Governance ...................................................................... 7 2.1.2. History of Corporate Governance ...................................................... 7 2.1.3. Corporate Governance Structures ..................................................... 8 2.1.4. Good Corporate Governance............................................................. 9 2.1.5. South Africa ....................................................................................... 9 2.2. THE ABSENCE OF GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE................... 11 2.2.1. Management.................................................................................... 11 2.2.2. Enron ............................................................................................... 12 2.2.3. WorldCom........................................................................................ 13 2.2.4. Leisurenet........................................................................................ 14 2.2.5. Detection of Fraud ........................................................................... 14 2.3. SARBANES-OXLEY AS A RESULT ....................................................... 15 2.3.1. Introduction to SOX ......................................................................... 15 2.3.2. The Impact of
Corporate governance can be defined as the process, customs, laws by which the affairs of a company are managed and controlled it also
Corporate Governance refers to the way a corporation is governed. It is the technique by which companies are directed and managed. It means carrying the business as per the stakeholders’ desires. It is actually conducted by the board of Directors and the concerned committees for the company’s stakeholder’s benefit. It is all about balancing individual and societal goals, as well as, economic and social goals. Corporate Governance is the interaction between various participants (shareholders, board of directors, and company’s management) in shaping corporation’s performance and the way it is proceeding towards. The relationship between the owners and the managers in an organization must be healthy and there should be no conflict between the