DMBA 610 Individual Paper Assignment
Week 2: Critical Thinking and Decision making
Assignment: Individual Paper
Assignment:
Individual Paper (15%) Your instructor will post a business memo that you will need to analyze applying the critical thinking model discussed in Asking the Right Questions. In a short paper (7-8 double-spaced pages) apply all of the steps of the critical thinking model to assess the arguments made in the memo. Include all of the steps. Leaving out discussion of steps will adversely affect your grade. Although not necessary for a passing grade, answers to some of the questions may be enhanced by doing additional research.
Remember that your task here is to evaluate the author's argument as
…show more content…
| Identifies the most important ambiguous words and phrases in the article and succinctly explains the effect ambiguity has on the author’s reasoning. | Demonstrates general understanding of concept of ambiguous phrases and identifies some. | Does not demonstrate understanding of ambiguous phrases; does not identify key ambiguity in the memo, includes laundry list of phrases without explanation. | 4 or 4 and 5What are the value assumptions and conflicts?What are the descriptive assumptions? | Demonstrates solid understanding of value conflicts and assumptions and descriptive assumptions, clearly identifies and succinctly discusses the major descriptive and value assumptions and value conflicts in the memo. Demonstrates clear understanding of the difference between value assumptions and descriptive assumptions. | Demonstrates some understanding of descriptive and value assumptions and value conflicts, identifies some and provides satisfactory explanation of their effect on the argument. May have some confusion over definitions, but generally demonstrates understanding of the concepts. | Does not demonstrate understanding of descriptive assumptions, value assumptions and/or value conflicts. Omits discussion and/or confuses the concepts. | 5 or 6. Are there any fallacies in the reasoning? | Demonstrates solid understanding of the concept of reasoning fallacies and identifies the most important fallacies in the argument by name and discusses their
In this article titled “Analyzing Arguments: Those You Read and Those You Write” goes over multiple strategies and examples to help you analyze the meaning and purpose of a specific argument and how to strengthen your own.
On pages 387-402 of your textbook, you will meet Tanya, Kevin, Elise and Dalton, Tanya encounters a series of discussions—the first with Kevin and the second with Elise and Dalton. The textbook describes how to critically assess the arguments in these discussions (Kevin and Elise and Dalton). Use these ONLY as examples for how to use critical thinking skills.
2. Describe the different viewpoints within the controversy. Explain why each creates questions that must be addressed. Student Viewpoint/Evidence
After analyzing the evidence presented from both perspectives, it is clear to see that both sides have reasonable points that must be considered when
What does each group or person believe? What do they value? What information are they using as a basis for these beliefs? What decision-making criteria and processes have they employed?
Use the space below to make your argument. Take a stance. Defend it with facts and evidence. 5 Paragraph Essay. Intro Paragraph. 3 Body Paragraphs. Conclusion Paragraph.
The use of opposing sources was also well integrated into the overall argument, and the overall paper is objective. However, some of the arguments are not fully clear as they are not surmised and repeated.
Instructions: Use the chart below to keep track of arguments about a controversial issue explored in class. First, write a summary of the issue addressing the “who, what, when, where and why” of the issue. Then, use your research to fill in the table with arguments either in favor or against the policy. Finally, come to your own conclusion about the issue. Write your opinion and justification. Be sure to include the values, beliefs and influences that guided your decision.
Web. 24 Sept. 2016. And when I was conducting the research for these argumentative point for this paper I hadn’t found many other strong argumentative points that I could have worked off of because this subject is somewhat biased due to there being many individuals not knowing enough about the goals of one side or not having all of the facts and
Another point of weakness in the article is related to the weak evidences oftenly used by the author.
Although the author spotlights valid and reasoned arguments which supports the article, it isn’t constructed in an organized manner. Conflicting utilization of commas, long examples, and extreme usage bolded headings alongside footnotes make the writer's perspective and reason hard to appreciate. All in all, Van Schewick fails to dispense readers with a well-structured argument, which ultimately deteriorates the value of the
According to Browne and Keeley, critical thinking is the application of active listening and asking questions in an effort to determine the validity of a speaker or writers claim (2013, p. 4). The critical thinking process is applied through a 10 step identification process: 1) issue and conclusion, 2) reasons supporting the conclusion, 3) ambiguous terms and phrases, 4) values and descriptive assumptions, 5) fallacies, 6) evidence, 7) rival causes, 8) statistics deception, 9) significant omission and 10) reasonable conclusions (Browne & Keeley, 2013). Using the 10 step process, I will evaluate an internal memo from Mr. Anil Ravaswami, Vice President of Human Resources, to Ms. Cynthia Castle, CEO, for Cliffside Holding Company of Massapequa (CHCM) and identify the details of the critical thinking process (A. Ravaswami, personal communication, October 10, 2012, p. 3).
The process of critical thinking requires you to ask more questions of both others and of yourself before a decision or determination is made. In order to successfully evaluate data in a critical manner, you must have a system in place to assess information as it is presented. In any situation whether you are having a conversation, observing others, or material you have read, you must be ready to probe deeper and ask the right question at the right time.
Critical thinking is a process that can help us make decisions in our life by thinking from different perspectives. It is a device that helps evaluate ideas through the testing of statements and the reasoning behind them. Just like any other skill, one must learn how to use critical thinking before utilizing it. In this paper I will use the 11-step method from the text “Asking the Right Questions: A Guide to Critical Thinking (11th Ed.), developed by M. Neil Browne and Stuart M. Keeley (2015). The book is an essential tool for developing critical thinking skills and will be used to conduct an evaluation on a memorandum identifying whether the Cliffside Holding Company of Massapequa (CHCM) would establish a
First, the term Value means ensuring that the right choices are made about obtaining the optimum balance of