Critique Of A Scholastic Literature Review

Admittedly before reading The Norton Introduction to Literature section of our reading homework my perception of literature is mostly based on stereotypes and misconceptions. For instance, I am not sure why despite the fact that I genuinely enjoy reading I have avoided literature to a degree. I am not sure if I thought I might not comprehend the books content or author’s intent. Or because social stereotypes suggest literature to be the property of Harvard elite and English gentleman instead a common man such as myself? Either way after reading the books introduction to literature I now understand how it can reflect perceptions, preconceptions, and most importantly misconceptions in human society from both the author and readers views point.

When looking at each of the articles presented, there are defining factors that allow researchers to determine whether or not it is a scholarly or popular resource. Of the two articles, one can assert that the USA Today Article is a popular source and the article by Baker and Algorta (2016) is a scholarly source. Each of these sources has their advantages and disadvantages due to the stylistic devices employed by the writers. With the help of each article, knowledge of readers and viewers is expanded, and while there are some facets that detract from the quality of the knowledge gained, the readers benefits from the time spent reading.

A research critique aims to measure the value and significance of a study. These are determined by

Refer to "Research Critique Part 1." Questions under each heading should be addressed as a narrative, in the structure of a formal paper.

A literature review is a type of APA paper that summarizes a scientific text about ones topic or question. A literature review focuses on a specific topic of interest and includes a critical analysis where one would compare different literature that relates to the subject of one’s own work. It normally includes a title page, introduction section, and a list of references. Many confuse a literature review with an annotated bibliography, but the difference between a literature review and an annotated bibliography is that an annotated bibliography only summarizes briefly about an article that one viewed while an annotated bibliography focuses specifically on a topic.

Part of the course to which the task refers: Part 4- Literature, a critical study

The aim of this essay is to critically appraise one of the research articles and reflect on what is good

___V. Uses, Value, Strengths, Weaknesses, Professional Commentary in literature - The primary goal of this study was

Review existing knowledge means to look at the research that has already been done. It is a good way to start any research project because it avoids repeating procedures that someone else has already done. Reviewing literature will help you clarify and justify the focus of your planned research. This process will also reveal that you know and understand the context on the issue, giving credibility and authority to your hard work.

This class is organized in a manner that allow students to start preparing themselves for the mayor assignments since the very beginning of the semester. A mayor tool used in order to succeed in such assignments during this course was the book ¨Writing that Works¨ from the author Oliu, W. E., Brusaw, C.T., & Alred, G.J. as well as the peer review, and the samples. Such tools had being helpful in order to show us the correct path that must be follow in order to write a research in a proper manner. As well, the previous preparation had help us to know how to analyze, identify and write to a specific audience. The Review of Literature specifically had help a lot since it requires a deep investigation of the topic that each student choose. This

What was the background for the study? That is, what pervious knowledge did the author describe as a foundation for the study in the “review of related literature”?

Because once the scholar-practitioner found material, it is up to that individual to establish the validity and usefulness of the source (Laureate Education, 2013).

There is an exact explication to the original study and backed by a uniform structure, while every component may not be applicable in all circumstances (in sequential order) – Title Page, Abstract, Introduction, Literature Review, Methodology, Results, Discussion, Conclusion, References, Appendices. Over the time, people have modified their use; the general

In “An Introduction to Literature, Criticism and Theory” Bennett and Royle, explore topics such as subjectivity and ideology. In the Chapters “Me” and Ideology”, Bennett and Royle are able to define the terms as well as suggest how they are interrelated or interconnected. Bennett and Royle contend that literature replicates structures of ideology while encouraging subjects to question personal idenitity. They believe “subjects – people – make their own ideology at the same time as ideology makes them subjects” (Bennett and Royle 202). Stevens exemplifies Bennett and Royles contentions by building his ideologies around his profession as a bulter at the risk of losing himself to the subjection of his ideologies in which he can never be alone and cannot exist without his profession or the justications of his profession.

The literature review “is the part of the thesis where there is extensive reference to related research and theory in your field; it is where connections are made between the source texts that you draw on and where you position yourself and your research among these sources”. (Ridley,2008).