Subject: Decision Support Tools (ACC544)
Student’s Name Student Id Ujas Patel 11560442
Maulik Raval 11580367
Faculty Member: MR RAJEEV ARORA Title: Income Distribution in Australia
Income Distribution of Australia
Its uses in business decisions
Table of Contents
Table of Contents 3
Introduction: 4
Descriptive Statistics: 5
Income distribution across states in Australia 6
Discussion with regard to transport sector: 9
References: 10
Introduction:
There are various ways of presenting the income distribution in any country. It can be graphically represented using a histogram with the various ranges of net worth as shown in the following figure. Source: (ABS, 2014)
The above graph shows the income and net worth of households and the percentage of population belonging to each net worth category is depicted using the various data points. One can notice that the percentage of population which is in the net worth category of $0 to $50000 is nearly 12%, while the data points in the distribution is said to be skewed, which can be analyzed in more detail when descriptive statistics for the same is calculated.
Descriptive Statistics: Net Worth Ranges Mean 3.222581
Standard Error 0.44208
Median 3.4
Mode 3.8
Standard Deviation 2.461397
Sample Variance 6.058473
Kurtosis 4.226665
Skewness 1.595086
Range 11.7
Minimum 0.3
Maximum 12
Sum 99.9
Count 31
In the above descriptive statistics we can see that both
Inequality exists around us. One of the inequalities is the income received by a person or member of a family. This income includes wages, salaries, pensions, and interest derived from assets. Income inequality refers to the various income within a given population. This inequality is especially high in the United States.
Income inequality describes the extent to which income is distributed unevenly among residents of an area. High levels of inequality indicate that a small number of people receive most of the total income, and that most people receive only a small share of the total. There are many advantages and disadvantages associated with the inequitable distribution of income.
In the U.S., the top one percent of U.S. households has _____ of all wealth and _____ of all income.
It is a commonly accepted that inequality is increasing throughout the globe, with startling statistics such as the recent Oxfam report indicating that the richest 85 people in the world own more wealth than the poorest 3.5 billion people(Oxfam Australia Media, 2014). Inequality is thought of as disparities or gaps, such as the distance between a low income and a high income household, or the ratio of their incomes (Divided We Stand, 2011). Domestic inequality refers to inequality within a country and
Income and wealth distribution: comparing the differences in levels of income and wealth between different social groups help measure inequalities in society. The income is a regular flow of money earned by someone working or from someone’s benefits, pension or their savings. Wealth is defined on property, shares or other belongings that could be sold to make an income. This is very hard to measure accurately and to
The issue of income inequality in the United States is complicated and does not have a definite answer. Income inequality can be measured in a few different ways. The first measurement for the income inequality in a country is to look at the percentages on households and group them into income categories, called distribution by income category. The second measurement for income inequality is called distribution by quintiles or fifths. This is when you divide the total number of people, households, families into five groups called quintiles to examine the percentage of total before tax income received by each quintile. Each quintile would then be ordered by income and households in the category.
In a research of Harvard professor 5000 people in America have opinion in how they think about the actual distribution of wealth in the U.S. and the 92 percent choose the ideal would be 20 percent and 20 percent the middle class. However, the reality is very far from it. “The poorest are not even registered, they are on the package change and the middle class is barely distinguished from the poor, even the rich between the 10 % and 20 % are worst off, only the top 10 % are better off. Only the one percent gets ten time higher and 40 % all the nation wealth. The bottom 80 % 8 out 10 people only has 7 % between them.1 % makes a quarter of the national income today”(you tube, 2015). All of this data reflex one of the truly perspectives in economy of the U.S. Not only people with low wages are the most affected, but also those who have good jobs and
First we must define what exactly income inequality really is and that is according to Definition of ‘Income Inequality’ (2015) said to be unequal income distributed to household or individual across the various participants in an economy. Income inequality is often presented as the percentage of income to a percentage of population. For example,
One measure that has been used to measure income distribution in Australia is provided by the income shares going to groups of people at different points in the income distribution. In 2011-12, 10.4% of total equivalised disposable household income went to the people in the low-income group and 39.5% went to the high income group which relates to 20% of the population.
This reveals that a relatively small proportion of households have high net worth and a large portion of households have low net worth, concluding with the simple statement that: The distribution of wealth is more unequal in Australia than the distribution of income.
In any given population, there is a difference between what people within the population earn. The uneven distribution of income in any given population is income inequality. In order for there to be income, there has to be several sources of income. These sources of income may be combinational or independent per person receiving the income. Income may result from wages, rent, bank account interests, salaries or even profits made in business transactions ( Stiglitz, 2012).
The last pairing of variables I combined together is Income and Size and it demonstrated in a scatter plot. The household size of 7 or 8 has the highest income is with over $69,000 and more. The shape of distribution is positive linear relationship.
Whereas, poverty shows a positive skewness value of .670 since its variables have numerous high values, which justifies the right skewness of the histogram.
Income redistribution refers to the concept of transferring income from the wealthy individuals to the less wealthy individuals through social mechanisms such as monetary policies, charity, welfare, land reforms, and taxation among others. Income redistribution affects the entire economy rather than selected groups of individuals. The concept of income redistribution emanates from the existence of income inequalities within an economy. Income inequality depicts a gap between the highest and the lowest income earners in an economy (Tullock 13). Income inequality is sometimes considered appropriate in societies since it acts as an incentive in free market economies, whereby in the absence of inequality, elements of economic stagnation and lack of enterprise would emerge. Conversely, income inequality is criticized on the basis of introducing contributing towards the development of key problems in the society, including progression of poverty levels. This paper seeks to explore the concept of income redistribution and its key pros and cons.
Mark Pearson from the OECD, told BBC News: "It's not just income that we're seeing being very concentrated - you look at wealth and you find that the bottom 40% of the population in rich countries have only 3% of household wealth whereas the top 10% have over half of household wealth." (Anthony Reuben, 2015)