In Meditations II Rene Descartes, the father of modern philosophy changed the landscape of Western Philosophy by stating: ‘cogito ergo sum – I think, therefore I am’. Now referred to as Descartes’ Cogito argument. The introduction of the cogito would go on to not only immortalize Descartes but also solidify his status as a pioneer of human thought. However, over time many modern day philosophers have begun to question the merit of Descartes’ Cogito argument. Much of the argument’s criticism draws from its uncanny similarities to Avicenna’s Floating Man thought experiment, which had been presented 600 years prior. Despite the apparent similarities between these arguments, a thorough analysis of each account will reveal unexpected distinctions. …show more content…
If he isn’t capable of truly knowing something, then how does he know he actually exists? Because of the evil demon Descartes is forced to doubt his senses, body, knowledge and even his own existence. But by forcing Descartes to question his own existence the evil demon’s deception stumbles upon itself. Descartes realized that by doubting his own existence he possessed the ability to ‘doubt’, which ironically reinsured his own existence. This invoked Descartes’ famous phrase “Cogito, ergo sum”- I think, therefore I am. According to Descartes even if we assumed that an evil demon exists and that this evil demon was capable of deceiving ‘us’ into doubting everything, such doubt requires an ‘us’ to exist in order to be deceived. By asking ourselves: ‘How can I be persuaded to believe I don’t exist without already existing?’ and ‘How can the demon deceive me unless I exist?’ we reaffirm Descartes’ idea that if we can think then we know with the utmost certainty that we exist. Because even if we’re thinking and our thoughts are wrong it doesn’t contradict the fact we are actually thinking. Yet, it is important to note that Descartes’ Cogito argument is strictly limited to our ability to think. What I mean by this is that we can’t be completely sure that we exist by saying ‘I jump, therefore I am’. The reason being is that we can easily …show more content…
Considered by many to be the precursor to Descartes Cogito argument, Avicenna’s Floating Man thought experiment attempts to prove that the soul possesses innate awareness of itself. In Avicenna’s Floating Man thought experiment, he asks us to imagine ourselves in a state where we are stripped of all our senses. As a response towards the common conception that knowledge comes from our senses Avicenna further states that within this state we have only two sources of sense knowledge. First, everything we have previously acquired from experience or simply all of our knowledge from our memories and imagination. Second any of our occurrent sensations. Avicenna goes on to explain that in order to accomplish this thought experiment we must further imagine ourselves in a brand new state in which we are ‘fully mature’. He explains that we can now disregard all empirical knowledge, while presupposing an intellect with full rational capacities. Now after satisfying all of Avicenna’s conditions he has us imagine that we are suspended in a void where none of our limbs are touching and we are unable to see, touch, smell, taste or hear anything. In such a state Avicenna argues that we not only can’t feel our own body but we can’t also sense any external
In this paper, I will discuss the “Divisibility argument” on Descartes mind- body dualism presented on Descartes meditations. I will claim that the mind and the body are in fact different as Descartes argument suggests, but I will more rather neglect and explain why his belief that the mind is indivisible is wrong. I also will discuss how Descartes argument on the body’s divisibility is reasonable, and the reasons why I believe this argument is true.
Descartian dualism is one of the most long lasting legacies of Rene Descartes’ philosophy. He argues that the mind and body operate as separate entities able to exist without one another. That is, the mind is a thinking, non-extended entity and the body is non-thinking and extended. His belief elicited a debate over the nature of the mind and body that has spanned centuries, a debate that is still vociferously argued today. In this essay, I will try and tackle Descartes claim and come to some conclusion as to whether Descartes is correct to say that the mind and body are distinct.
To conclude, the Cogito Ergo Sum argument is sound since both its logical form is valid and its premises are true. Descartes has shown that the mind is more reliable then the senses, the thought “I exist” does not occur through the mediation of a representation and that the activity of thought is distinct from any bodily activity. The importance of such an argument comes as Descartes will argue against solipsism and that things exist outside of us.
Despite this problem, we believe it is the same piece of wax we see, touch, or imagine. But it is not our feelings or imagination that gives us the idea. If we had evaluated these abilities, and if the wax is distorted, we would not be able to agree that it is the same wax. This study enables us to recognize that the imagination, just like sensation, does not convey the true nature of wax; rather, this difficulty indicates that only understanding, exercising its powers of conception and judgment, performs the unifying function that constitutes the self-identity of the piece of wax: “our perception of the wax is neither a seeing, nor a touching, nor an imagining… but the mind alone” (68). Although the changing characteristics of the body has been transported through our senses and imagination, the identity of the matter is provided by the understanding of the wax itself. This analysis confirms Descartes’ view that “what we thought we had seen with our eyes, we actually grasped solely with the faculty of judgment, which is in our mind” (68). Therefore, any sense of the body is actually an introspection of our mind, not an external inspection.
This essay attempts to explain Descartes’ epistemology of his knowledge, his “Cogito, Ergo Sum” concept (found in the Meditations), and why he used it [the cogito concept] as a foundation when building his structure of knowledge. After explaining the concept I give a brief evaluation of his success in introducing and using this cogito as a foundation. Finally, I provide reasons why I think Descartes succeeded in his epistemology.
‘Cogito Ergo Sum,’ - ‘I think therefore I am ‘ one of the most famous and well known quotes or arguments in all of modern philosophy; a phrase instantly recognizable to all those studying in the field of philosophy. This phrase refers to an attempt by Descartes to prove with absolute certainty his own existence; a systematic way to philosophize. The argument, while first proposed by ancient philosophers such as Aristotle and Saint Augustine, was utilized as an argument by French philosopher Rene Descartes in his influential text “Meditations on First Philosophy“. This argument appears in the books second meditation and provides the cornerstone for Descartes argument in the following five meditations and serves as the basis for Descartes overall metaphysical thesis, without which Descartes reasoning system would collapse. Throughout this paper I will
Reneì Descartes’ treatise on dualism, his Meditations on First Philosophy, is a seminal work in Western intellectual history, outlining his theory of the mind and its relation to the rest of the world. The main argument running through the Meditations leads from his universal methodic doubt through his famous cogito, to proofs of dualism, God, and the world. The Cartesian dualism is one of the most influential ideas to come out of the work; the style of the Meditations, however, is one of personal rumination, following what appears to be Descartes’ stream of consciousness , and it allows for mild tangential discussions. Hence alongside his more famous argument for dualism,
Recalling his previous thoughts in Meditation Two, the Meditator supposes that what he sees does not exist, that his memory is faulty, that he has no senses and no body, and that extension, movement and place are mistaken notions. Perhaps, he remarks, the only certain thing remaining is that there is no certainty. Although this argument often seems logical and fully-developed, Descartes uses this meditation to as inspiration prove that perhaps there is one thing that is absolutely certain in the universe: his existence.
This then leads him to question the existence of God, and then whether he himself truly exists as well. Descartes concludes his claim in stating, “So after considering everything very thoroughly, I must finally conclude that this proposition, I am, I exist, is necessarily true whenever it is put forward by me or conceived in my mind,” (25). Therefore, in spite of everything he is skeptical of, Descartes manages to believe that his true existence is not something worthy of doubt.
In the First Meditation, Descartes invites us to think skeptically. He entices us with familiar occasions of error, such as how the size of a distant tower can be mistaken. Next, an even more profound reflection on how dreams and reality are indistinguishable provides suitable justification to abandon all that he previously perceived as being truth. (18, 19) By discarding all familiarity and assumptions, Descartes hopes to eliminate all possible errors in locating new foundations of knowledge. An inescapable consequence of doubting senses and prior beliefs
Descartes’ reasoning in the cogito argument is that we rely heavily on senses that can be doubted. Descartes believes that seeking out a clear perception within ourselves and our minds will help us reason with and obtain a more in-depth knowledge of our perceptions. Because we are able to think, we can argue that we exist. “I think, therefore I am.” This means that the fact that we think, believe, love, hate, and every other mental function can actually prove that we exist.
Rene Descartes Meditations is known to be one of his most famous works, it has also shown to be very important in Philosophical Epistemology. Within the meditation’s he provides many arguments that remove pre-existing notions, and bring it to the root of its foundation which Descartes, then will come up with his indubitable foundation of knowledge to defeat any doubt and to prove God is real. Descartes was a “foundationalist”, by introducing a new way of knowledge and with clearing up how people thought about things prior. Descartes took knowledge to its very foundations, and from there he can build up from it. In this essay, I will be discussing Descartes, and analyzing his first two meditations and arguing that he does indeed succeed in his argument.
It is the purpose of this essay to examine both Descartes’ Cogito argument and his skepticism towards small and universal elements, as well as the implications these arguments have on each other. First, I will summarize and explain the skepticism Descartes’ brings to bear on small and universal elements in his first meditation. Second, I will summarize and explain the Cogito argument, Descartes’ famous “I think, therefore I am” (it should be noted that this famous implication is not actually something ever said or written by Descartes, but instead, an implication taken from his argument for his own existence). Third, I will critique the line of reasoning underlying these arguments. Descartes attacks
In his Meditations on First Philosophy, Descartes strives first and foremost to provide an infallibly justified foundation for the empirical sciences, and second to prove the existence of God. I will focus on the first and second meditations in my attempt to show that, in his skepticism of the sources of knowledge, he fails to follow the rules he has set out in the Discourse on Method. First I claim that Descartes fails to draw the distinction between pure sensation and inference, which make up what he calls sensation, and then consider the consequences of this failure to follow his method. Second, I will show that in his treatment of thinking Descartes fails to distinguish between active and passive thinking.
This argument means you can doubt your own existence. Descartes was a little uneasy about this, because he stated only he think he exist. His motto was “If I think I must exist”. He explained that you have to first know what certainty is, what your existence if any is, and what your thoughts are. Thinking leads to doubting and doubting leads to Radical freewill. The other part of the argument is the Modus Ponens, which mean “If p then q, therefore”. He is just messing with our logic, since he has already tried to trick us with the 2+2=4 logic already. For instance, if you have sensation Y, which can means that you are thinking, you have only formed a belief that you are thinking. Therefore you can know that you are thinking. He believed that logic causes the doubt that he is experiencing within