Dichotomy: The Rise Of The Republican Party

In 1854, the Republican Party was established as a response to controversial issues within the United States of America. The founders of this political party ‒ anti-slavery Whigs, former Democrats, former members of the Free Soil Party and Know-Nothing Party ‒ helped to identify their ideals prior to the Civil War.

Although he was a generally controversial president, Ronald Reagan’s policy decisions to stimulate economic prosperity, known as Reaganomics, were legitimately beneficial to the United States of America. First, in order to substantiate the success of Reagan’s economic policy decisions one must first grasp the varying levels of importance for each aspect of his plan. As Reagan’s policies were substantial decisions that defined his presidency and alienated an entire population of more economically liberal people, it makes sense that an understanding of his emphasis on certain decisions would lead to a more persuasive argument. Next, the negation of well formed and logical criticisms of Reagan’s economic policies also lend to the support of their benefits and success. Acknowledging a sensible counterargument and addressing specific points of critical analysis serves to further enhance the argument for the success of Reagan’s decisions. Furthermore, strong economic growth and the curbing of federal domestic power reinforce the accomplishments of Reaganomics. Though the U.S. did see economic growth, Reaganomics was not purely an economic plan, as cuts in government power, not including the military, benefitted the average American citizen. Moreover, Ronald Reagan’s economic decisions regarding Soviet foreign policy were also extremely beneficial to the United States. The tough decisions to further the national deficit proved a worthy sacrifice in pressuring the collapse

Krugman starts off his essay by painting the picture of his younger days in a rather fair and middle-class American society. The theme of his writing is centered around policies with the power to reverse the extreme economic imbalance the United States has been challenged with. The excessively divided American economy contradicts the basis of America’s birth: “Ever since America’s founding, our idea of ourselves has been that of a nation without sharp class distinctions- not a leveled society of perfect equality, but one in which the gap between the economic elite and the typical citizen isn’t an unbridgeable chasm” (Graff, Birkenstein,

Reaganomics—also known as supply-side and trickle-down economics—is an economic policy practiced by presidents Warren G. Harding, Calvin Coolidge, and Herbert Hoover in the twenties and most recently, by the fortieth president of the United States, Ronald Reagan. Just like the state of the economy before Reagan stepped into office, the economy of the United States today is in a vulnerable place. The economy has taken multiple blows over the last few years: a recession in 2008, a close call in 2011, and an overwhelming deficit. Most Americans are looking for something to change. While some are advocating for an increase in the government’s power in order to step in and seemingly help the people, the way for the government to truly succor

immigrants of being drug dealers, rapists, murderers, and criminals overall. “There is a very real criminal component utilizing the dislocations caused by massive immigration to cover crimes of every variety, from drug trafficking to murder. This does not [account] for irresponsible driving habits that also take a toll of American citizens. This writer has two friends in two separate incidents that were killed by errant aliens. In both case, the aliens fled across the border to avoid vehicular manslaughter charges” (Thompson). The reality behind the Republican Party´s arguments against immigration is discrimination and racism. “They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. They're rapists” (Trump). Their statements are not based on evidence or statistics, but are huge generalizations.

Even though Reagan was very confident about his economic plan many others were weary of his ideas. George W. Bush Sr. proclaimed Reagan’s economic ideas as ‘Voodoo’ economics believing Reagan’s policy would not live up to its predicted outcome; ironically enough Bush and his son both adopted these policies during their presidencies. Many important congressmen had many fears in Reagan’s policies, they believed that imposing such tax cuts would raise inflation and cause higher interest rates. The public on the other hand, praised these

Most Americans discarded progressive candidates in support of conservatives who believed in a traditional Laissez Faire economy. Future democrat president Franklin Roosevelt predicted they" could not hope to return to power until the Republicans led the nation to a serious period of depression and unemployment.'" (Kennedy).

Due to the lack of Congressional response of both Republican and Democrats alike, stagflation and globalization, coupled with the Tech boom and the shipment of manufacturing jobs overseas, aided in the demise of a once robust labor union. Financial deregulation, another nemesis of the labor unions caused major taxpayer losses due to the Federal Reserves fraud and perpetuated greed during the Savings and Loan debacle. This crisis was the result of lax government oversight and a fraudulent ponzi scheme which some would link to the undervalued American dollar. Congressional legislation at this time aimed more for increasing inflation and cutting taxes for the extremely rich than focusing on what should have been the main priority: increasing manufacturing, reducing importation, and labor union employment.

In 1981 Ronald Wilson Reagan was elected as the 40th president of the United States. Reagan won in a landslide over former president and democratic candidate Jimmy Carter. In his inaugural speech he made the famous statement “government is not the solution to our problems, government is the problem.” This statement would later set the tone for his two consecutive terms as president and his instrumental role in shaping the values of generations of conservatives. ‘Reaganomics’ became household slang for the economic policies sanctioned by Reagan’s administration that developed a free enterprise market, high interest rates, and hands-off social policy that benefited America’s wealthy and depleted it’s poor.

Throughout the article, Krugman’s diction is displayed in a colloquial manner, often using terms such as “flub,” “wimps,” or “hacks,” in order to not overwhelm the reader and attract a wide-range audience. On occasion, he also dictates formally to highlight the negatives of the current and “incompetent” administration and their lack of commitment. Krugman’s syntax also contains the

is a clear, statement of the issues of the 1964 presidential campaign, including the hidden issues within the Republican Party. It gives a inside of the Republican National Conventions since 1936. It answers such questions as, Who, really picks your presidential candidates? How are political conventions stolen? Who are the secret kingmakers? How do hidden persuaders and propaganda gimmicks change politics? This book is about a lady called Phyliss Scallaf and it is about how she worked with congress and political places, and how she found out all the secrets of the libreals . While not be biased to the conservatives, it makes you have a whole different look on how our government is really working.

In which ways did the Fifties and Sixties in the USA set the scene for the rise of conservatism in the Seventies and into the Reagan era? Was the rise of the right inevitable? Please explain your point of view.

The Constitution has nothing to say about political parties. Nowhere does it define political parties or explicitly specify that there should be two dominant parties. Nevertheless, America has had a strong two party system for last 150 years, a degree of party stability and endurance that can be found in no other nation (Landy and Milkis, 451). This system of two dominant parties has both its advantages and its drawbacks, the same as any system will. The two strong parties simplify and stabilize American politics from both the citizens’ and the politicians’ point of view and allow for government to be unified across the separation of powers built into the Constitution

Debates - these battles of mental fortitude and intellectual dexterity are arguably the cornerstone of a thriving democracy. Picture this - a latino social Democrat from Los Angeles observes a flooring critique of the distinguished saltwater economist Paul Krugman delivered by Niall Ferguson, a famous Harvard economic historian. What he notes, aside from Ferguson’s eloquence, is Ferguson’s attempt to remain intellectually honest as he discusses political polarization occurring in the modern political system as it relates to macroeconomic realities. A palpable dearth of political distortion surfaces in Ferguson's ideological argument as he describes both modern “caricatures of austerity and caricatures of stimulus.” For those unfamiliar, austerity

Unfortunately, much of America did not heed Krugman’s warnings when his first book was released in 1999 because America was still rising high. Technology and the top businesses of the day were just starting and booming very fast and smoothly. While technology and internet giants such as Google were growing, the United States’ government’s budget surplus was also increasing. Yet, our government departments--Federal Research and Congress still insisted that capitalism should be a free market--that it will save itself, that regulating credit default swaps was unnecessary. Americans were overconfident with their past successes and forgot to look to other countries as models. Now, lasseiz-faire has turned around to bite America in the butt.