Dictatorship and Dictators Essay

Life to a dictator is dispensable. Dictators such as Adolf Hitler believed that “terrorism is an effective political tool”. People could be executed or tortured just for having a different opinion from their dictators, or for being of a different race [doc 5]. Hitler also said “already the boy in school must learn to be silent, not only when he is blamed justly but he has also to learn, if necessary, to bear injustice in silence,”… [Doc 8] This basically means that even if someone is wrongly accused of doing something they should just take the punishment and be executed or tortured rather than fight the police. Society was supposed to be submissive no matter what the circumstances were or be

A dictator is defined as a ruler with total power over a country, typically one who obtained power by force. In William Golding’s Lord of the Flies, Jack Merridew is the equivalent of a dictator to the boys of the island. Jack’s peculiar leadership style lead to both success and failures.

A dictator is a ruler with total power over a country, typically one who has obtained power by force. One of the most popular cases of dictatorship was Adolf Hitler, a German politician, who eventually gained control of multiple countries. In the text, Lord of The Flies, one of the main characters, Jack, is a horrific, cruel little boy who shows traits to that of Hitler. Many comparisons of the two can be made in the book, such as how they gained their power of their groups, why and how they have such power, and their mission, once their group had assembled.

Imagine living in a world where politics are everything and all forms of individuality and personal identities are shattered. A world where everybody is stripped of their rights to talk, act, think, or even form their own opinions, simply because they do not agree with the government’s beliefs. These aspects are just a few of the examples of things dictators would have control over in a totalitarianism form of government. Aggressive leaders such as Hitler and Joseph Stalin are examples of such dictators. They used their power for terror and murder, and their motive is simply to maximize their own personal power. George Orwell had

Dictators are criticized because of the amount of power they possess. With complete power, they can implement any laws, even biased and unjust laws. The possibility of inequity causes fear and anger in citizens and in turn, leads to the criticism of a dictator.

There have been many countless dictators that have forced their way into power though, Adolf Hitler, has gained authority through False usage of his political position and cleverness. Before Hitler advanced to power, he started from being a boy who desired to become a fine painter, but his artwork was neglected by the Academy of fine arts so he got involved in German Army. Joining German Army was Hitler’s first step in enhancing as a dictator “At the outbreak of World War I, he applied to serve in the German army. He was accepted in August 1914, though he was still an Austrian citizen”. During the WWI, he was employed as a confidential informant and showed his bravery and loyalty toward Germany by delivering classified information to the allies.

A tyrant leader will run his state into the ground before giving up what he believes in about how society should be run. Tyrants do not account for the thoughts of individuals. Their priority is to quickly and quietly take over the freedom of the citizens for the prosperity of themselves. The followers will accept the changes, although not by choice. The people will cooperate with the government as long as they feel protected and not abused. The issue with tyrants and how they become so powerful is through secretly taking from their city, while causing harm among its population. At the same time, the tyrant will convince the people that his path is the best route. If one denies, the individual and their loved ones will be put under great scrutiny.

When individuals become dictators, they have going from being patriotic to ultra-nationalistic. When a dictator is at the top, they believe in only one way of thinking – their own way. Only one race, one religion and one ethnicity is acceptable. People who don’t fit the idea of an “ideal citizen” that the dictator has set, often lose all basic rights – including: rights to free speech, voting, etc. When they are stripped of everything, they are considered inhuman and are often killed or deported to slavery camps. A dictator may control the thoughts of their own nation or country, but that does not mean they control the thoughts of the countries around them – this can result in war and ultimately genocide. In the source, it says that people

There was many dictator in the past a dictator in other words is a person with complete and total control over everything even the people can you imagine living in a time wear someone told you what to wear when and how to do something or even get killed if you looked a certain way crazy right as you can see a dictator is not a very nice perosn now I know what you thinking there were people actual like that and your answer is sadly yes some were worser than other and would go to any level to get there way and didnt stop till they got there way but enough talk lets get to the story the dictator i am writting about is non other than Mao Zendong

First we need to know what a dictator and a school bully is. A dictator is a ruler with total power over a country. One of the most well-known dictators was Adolf Hitler. He was a dictator who had complete power over Germany and other countries. A school bully is a person who uses strength or power to harm or intimidate those who are weaker.

A tyrant and an oppressor, a leader with complete control of a country, a dictator. In order to obtain, maintain, and take advantage of their power, a dictator must relate to a group of citizens, distribute written propaganda, and indoctrinate the next generation.

Generalissimo Francisco Franco came into power after his victory in the Civil war in 1939 and ruled over Spain till his death in 1975. In this 40-year period Spain was massive changed that causes much debate as to the political nature of Franco’s regime whether it is fascist or something different, Francoism. To understand if Franco’s regime was fascist, fascism must first be defined. There are many working definitions of a fascist regime, Stanley Payne’s states that the dictator must alien his regime to the idea of anti-isms, them being aintiliberalism, antidemocratic, anticonservatism, anticommunism and antidemocratic. Payne states these are fundamental in the description of a fascist regime. Another useful definition is Robert Griffin, stating that a fascist regime will use symbolism, violence to pursue its political aims, with the importance aimed at expansionism. Finally Griffin also states the need of the dictator to implement an authoritarian and totalitarian government. All these help to create a fascist regime and more importantly a truly fascist dictator. There is little doubt Franco holds to some of these definitions yet in later year the idea of Francosim becomes more viable however to understand if Franco was a truly fascist dictator we must look to the similarities and differences and determine by examining Franco’s rise politically his general style of government and finally his foreign policies it will determined whether Franco was a truly fascist dictator.

A dictatorship is a government ruled by one commander. An example of this is Iraq. Saddam Hussein is the dictator of Iraq. Whatever he decides becomes law. Dictatorships are similar to absolute monarchies in that they are very oppressive to the people of the country. The major difference between the two is that absolute monarchies are families inheriting their power while dictatorships often result from military takeovers or from an elected official who refuses to step down from his elected office.

Singapore 's former Prime Minster, Lee Kuan Yew once said: "Human beings, regrettable though it may be, are inherently vicious and have to be restrained" (Kwang, Fernandez, & Tan 1). One can infer from Kuan Yew’s statement that he 's subtly saying that individuals shouldn 't be in control of their choices, yet there ought to be somebody to settle on choices for them. An ideology such as this can stem from an authoritarian government. In this day and age, most nations have a tendency to have a democracy. However, it wasn 't generally that way. Throughout history, there were nations under authoritarian rule. In order to fully understand what an authoritarian regime is, one must know the meaning of it. An authoritarian government is "an oppressive regime that rules through strict, intrusive, and violent enforcement of laws. It can “take the form of a dictatorship, but may also manifest itself in totalitarian bureaucracies or oligarchies" (Ritter 576). An authoritarian regime exists when a leader or a small group of leaders owns all property and are the sole decision makers for the entire population. There are only two questions left to be asked. How are authoritarian regimes created and how do they even stay in power? Authoritarian governments ascend to power due to a postwar upheaval and the leader in the charge; they stay in power by employing a resource trap and having a one party system.

The Arab Spring has been a life changing phenomena, not only for the people who are attempting to overthrow their governments but for political scientists everywhere. The events originating in the North African country of Tunisia have led to the snowballing of several other Middle Eastern, predominantly Muslim, nation states. The figurative breaking point might have finally been reached as the oppressed peoples of the Middle East have risen up to overthrow long-standing dictatorial governments in hopes of revolutionary change; change that is subject to the will of the people.