The other difference between Yeats’ and Comains’ poems, Easter, 1916 and Ireland’s Bloody Sunday respectively in terms of imperialism is the depiction of the nature of death that the Irish rebels encountered as a result of revolting against British rule. Despite the fact that both the poems share the poets’ mention of martyrdom, the fate that the Irish rebels met as a result of revolution is depicted differently in the poems. The names of the martyrs mentioned in Yeats’ Easter, 1916 such as MacDonagh, MacBride, Connolly and Pearse (1916) are the ones, who were executed by British and were the ones who led the protest against British rule in Ireland. But in contrast, the names of the martyrs mentioned in Comain’s Ireland’s Bloody Sunday such as Gilmore […] Kelly (1972) are the ones, who met …show more content…
In order to support the preceding statement, the excerpts from Comain’s Ireland’s Bloody Sunday can be used, which argue, “But after a presentation […] British soldiers brutally” (1972). The reason that led to the death of Irish people reflected in Comain’s poem can be undoubtedly attributed to the firing action of British soldiers. Hence, the rebels mentioned in Easter, 1916, were executed whereas the rebels mentioned in Ireland’s Bloody Sunday were killed during the protest.
The other difference that sets Yeats and Comain’s poems apart is the reason that attributes to the killing of Irish rebels by British as a result of former’s protest .In Yeats’ Easter, 1916, British had either killed or executed Irish rebels because the latter had planned to revolt against the former and were also armed. This becomes indicative when Yeats in his poem Easter, 1916 argues, “Was it needless death after all? For England may keep faith for all that is done and said” (1916).
Consequently, “Who Goes with Fergus?” is a very complex poem. It presents a stimulus for the young people to give up on their political struggle and instead find the mysteries of nature: “Who will go with Fergus now,/ And pierce the deep wood’s woven shade,/ And dance upon the level shore?”. Moreover, the poem also represents the poet’s own frustration over his own lapsed romance. He is decided to leave his love behind and try to amend his situation by following Fergus: “And no more turn aside and brood/ Upon love’s bitter mystery;”. But more than anything, as was stated above, this poem symbolizes an analogy in order to stimulate the young into fighting for a better Ireland – showing in this poem, once again, Yeats’ own sense of nationalism.
When Yeats moved back to London to pursue his interest in Arts, he met famous writers like Maud Gonne. The Poem “To Ireland in the Coming Times” is one of the poems Yeats wrote in 1892 and was published in The Countess Kathleen and Various Legends. “Know, that I would accounted
Often, personal experiences are what influence a poet’s writing. Since the 1600s and up until World War One, poets have been heavily impacted by the glorification of war, as well as the catastrophic losses the world has suffered from. Poets such as Richard Lovelace and Lord Tennyson glorified the sacrifices soldiers made for their countries and honored them. While poets like Mary Borden and Wilfred Owen expressed their outrage towards war because they have witnessed the brutality and wickedness of it. In the two poetry collections, diction is the main factor in establishing the tone and theme of each poem.
Compare how poets present the effects of conflict in ‘Belfast Confetti’ and one other poem from Conflict.
An Irish nationalist paramilitary organization called the Irish Republican Brotherhood (IRB) was established in 1858 and worked for the armed expulsion of the British, where the Home Rule Party worked for the political expulsion. In 1912, the British passed a Home Rule Bill, which gave the Irish political autonomy, but the bill was never enacted due to the breakout of World War I in 1914. In 1913, two organizations, the nationalist Irish Volunteers (IV) and unionist (pro-British) Ulster Volunteers (UV) were founded in Dublin and Belfast, respectively, and the IV absorbed the IRB. The two groups were set for a full-on conflict before the outbreak of the war, but both sides believed the national question could be answered after WWI and sent men to the trenches. A small, revolutionary minority of the IV stayed behind, as they did not want to fight for the British, these men constituted the IRB, and saw WWI as their time to strike the weakened British. They struck on Easter Sunday in 1916, but were defeated after six days. This became known as the Easter Rising. After the IRB was defeated, 16 of the leaders were taken to Kilmainham Gaol and executed. Executing the leaders of the Rising was England’s big mistake as it made them martyrs and gave the Irish the momentum they needed to fight a war of Independence, which began in 1919, and that’s where the movie, The Wind that Shakes the Barley, takes
Both poems are sonnets that focus on early death; however, each poet displays different emotions for life and death in their poems. On the one hand, Keats displays an optimistic view of life, but is contemptuous towards death since it will mark an unwanted end to his artistic, romantic, and countless other endeavors. On the other, Longfellow distrusts life and fears death. As an indicator of these contrasting sentiments, the poets not only use significantly different types of poems, but they also differ in their rhetorical devices’ purposes in the shared iambic pentameter structure. In particular, they use imagery, diction, mechanical devices and metaphors in varying extents and purposes.
The Irish had suffered long before in the hands of the English when Cromwell had been in control and had taken away land held by the catholic majority of the country to members of the protestant minority. This created a large tension among the population with the oppressed majority and the rather entitled minority who by Trevelyan’s snooty tone did indeed see themselves as the superior people in the country. (Trevelyan’s tone is probably the most dismissive when in discussion of the Irish, mayhaps showing his own true dislike.) (Trevelyan, p. 116-
W. B. Yeats, W. H. Auden, and Seamus Heaney all experienced senseless violence throughout their life. They all lived in the twentieth century, a time of greater violence than had ever been seen before, and their poetry, as well as views on the role of the poet in society illustrate the impact that violence had upon them. In response to this abundant stimuli, they wrote a great deal of poetry that seeks to comprehend the incomprehensible acts they observed. They each struggled with disillusionment, most especially Auden, whose views of poetry changed most radically. Ultimately, they all agree upon the senselessness of violence and war, but the difference is in the impact they allow it to have upon them.
Auden’s poem, 1st September 1939 – influenced by W.B Yeats’ poem, ‘Easter 1916’ – is giving the reader an insight to how corrupted society is and how most of the public do not dig deep enough for the truth. The title itself echoes a diary date which implies that Auden is narrating the poem from his own point of view. The date of when the poem was written is a vital point in history, not just for one nation but for every nation that was even slightly involved.
Composers explore the local and universal to communicate their text’s relevance to their world using historical evidence and present day knowledge to inform responders about their struggles. W.B Yeats examines the ideas of annunciation, the past and spiritualism within his world. Both poems, An Irish Airman Foresees His Death and The Second
William Butler Yeats's poems "Easter 1916" and "The Second Coming" each portray the theme of rebellion. However, rebellion is not always heroic and these two poems clash with one another to prove this point. "Easter 1916" contains text which presents rebellion as a positive action; whereas, "The Second Coming" makes the reader believe rebellion only leads to pure chaos and disorder until the end of time. In addition, Claude McKay's poem "If We Must Die" supports the idea of rebellion as a positive, honorable movement with examples throughout the text. Tales of rebelliousness and heroism have been used throughout history to inspire and give
While the poem does rhyme, it was freely written in the way the poet felt was most fitting. Secondly, this poem is fitting for the Modernist movement because it expresses what millions of people might have felt after the soldiers started shooting each other and all hell broke loose: it was the end of the world as they knew it. The part about the “millions of people” is important for this point, because Modernists like Yeats desired to move away from the personal towards the intellectual or collective. The poem criticizes the war by using cryptic images that are clear enough to convey their true meaning: Yeats was shocked at what had happened to his world. While Ireland was no part of the World War, the violent Easter Rising took place in 1916, when Ireland tried to break free from the British domination (“The 1916 Easter Rising”). Yeats, a Dubliner, was there to experience it himself.
“Heaney’s poetry grants sectarian killing in Northern Ireland a historical respectability which is not usually granted in day to day journalism” (Morrison, 68)
The importance of this poem to this reading is also seen in the fact that it betrays the political ideals that Yeats had: the poem implicates the speaker as being a senator. It is in after 1924 that Yeats served as a senator. This makes the poem sound like a poem which was penned down after the civil war, given that it is written from the standpoint of a more peaceful and politically stable Ireland. Thus, the poem is also instrumental as it lets the reader in into Yeats’ political orientation and leanings. Thus, the many qualities Yeats had and the many fields he operated in, in terms of career are well confirmed by this poem.
W. B. Yeats, a somewhat eclectic poet, explores, throughout his work, a wide range of themes and ideas. He reflects on his nation’s politics, Irish mysticism, the afterlife, love, and his own past. While each set of his poems share many recurring images, however, it is Yeats’ examination and opinions of the gyres of time and history that crop up in all forms of his poetry. While references to this great spiraling metaphor for the fabric of the universe can be found in some of Yeats’ most famous works, such as ‘Sailing to Byzantium’, ‘Long-legged Fly’ and ‘Easter 1916’, to name just a few, it is an aspect of his poetry which is relevant to almost all of his writing. However, it is in Yeats’ apocalyptic poems, ‘Leda and the Swan’ and ‘The