Differences And Similarities Between The New England And Southern Colonies

Land capabilities would also contribute to shaping these two areas differently. For the New Englanders, massive plantations and mass crop production was not an option with their rocky soil. The inability to use massive plots of land for crop production, contributed to the closeness of the New England settlers. This closeness allowed for the establishment

Being closer to the equator than New England, the south received longer planting seasons and also had good soil for planting. The Southern Colonies mainly produced corn, rice, and tobacco, which were very valuable exports. Unlike the Southern Colonies, in New England the soil was worse and often times the areas were rocky, often making it much harder to plant and even be profitable. The South was very reliant on African slaves for

The New England colonies didn’t rely on land to make money because they had a diverse economy and also tobacco and other cash crops needed a specific climate to be grown in. Although no one became as wealthy as those in the south, they had a very constant economy. They didn’t have to rely on one crop instead they were able to rely on rum, fur trade, fishing, trade, logging and shipbuilding. The next difference is religion. The south had religion but it wasn’t as big of a deal as the New England colonies. This was because the south spent most of the time farming that although they did have church agriculture was more significant. The New England colonies, especially Massachusetts, had a very strict religious system. Failure to follow this system could result in death or banishment. The last difference between them is the labor. In the south they needed a lot of slaves because crops like tobacco required constant attention like making sure it was healthy and also doing a lot of watching over those plants to make sure they were being grown properly. The south was also a slave society in that in order for it to be successful they would need a lot of slaves. On the other hand the New England colonies didn’t need slaves because the crops that they used didn’t need the attention that cash crops needed. Another reason is because they

The Chesapeake and New England colonies had many differences when it came to development; however, similarities can still be found. Some of the main similarities between the colonies were the time period in which they developed and their early demographics. Both colonies were founded in the early 1600s and started off with a demographic of mostly young white European males. In contrast, many differences between the New England and Chesapeake colonies can be found in their distinct geographies, economies, religions, and governments. In terms of

The three colonies all wanted to make money but they had to go about it in different ways. This was mainly due to what they had available. The New England Colonies were mainly agricultural farmers. With all the water reservoirs like Cape Cod there were plenty of fish so lots of people became fishermen. There were a lot of lumberjacks to cut down trees and export them to England. The Middle Colonies were extremely different because they set up extensive cosmopolitan cities reminiscent of New York. They had many specialists like doctors, lawyers, accountants, and teachers. They traded a lot with in North America and occasionally overseas. The Southern Colonies primarily depended on cotton and tobacco plantations. As the plantations grew they had to employ black slaves. The plantations were fully self contained with their own blacksmith, teachers and professionals. So there were no big cities or towns. The main plantations traded directly with Europe via the Mississippi. The three colonies all made money differently with their diverse professions and traders.

To sum it all up, the northern and southern colonies were as different as day and night. They were colonized for different reason. Also they had a very diverse climate. Their pattern of trade was

The colonies of the south and the New England had one similarity; there relationship with the natives. Both of the colonies had very bad relations with the natives. The south needed the native land for tobacco plantations, which caused a lot of conflict between the two groups. The conflict escalated to the point where the southerners gave the natives blankets infected with the smallpox virus. This virus killed off almost the whole native because they weren’t very well suited to fight the disease.

We are going to start discussing the economic aspect of both colonies, it is important to note that the economic activities and trade of each colony depended on the environment in which the settlers lived. Geography and climate were important factors that impacted the economic and commercial activities between New England colonies and Southern colonies because these depended on the environment.

Agriculture and environment were factors in the way each culture grew. The fertile land of the south along with a warmer climate made it possible for the colonists to grow cash crops such as tobacco, rice and indigo. However, this was not the case with

On the economic side both colonies had differences than similarities. The North had small farms while the South had larger farms which were called plantations. The main trade in the North was lumber. The South had less raw materials than the North and they mostly traded cotton. The cotton crop was very important to the Southern Colonies while the North was

In the 16th century, Europeans attempted to inhabit America, and their efforts sparked numerous occurrences within the various areas they were colonizing. These regions of English establishment are divided into three groups, based on how drastically varied they are from one another. Although, all three of the areas also share a few common similarities. The establishments were referred to as the New England Colonies, Middle Colonies, and Southern Colonies. As mentioned above, all of these regions have numerous similarities and differences concerning their formation and history.

The geography in New England and the Southern colonial regions were very different. The geography in New England was junky for farming because of the short growing seasons and cold winters. The colonists had lots of forests and woodlands in this region which provided many jobs. In comparison, the Southern colonies had good farm land

The already bleak environment was augmented by the harsh soil and the short growing season. These colonist had to rely on the water for a source of food and the forest for a source of lumber. Instead of being a primarily agrarian based people, the settlers in New England focused on creating cities,such as New York and Philadelphia, that could be centers for trade and commerce. They focused on manufacturing and producing things such as ships and alcohol, opposed to planting cash crops or trading animal pelts. Also, unlike the Southern Colonies and, to a certain extent, the Middle Colonies, New England was united by a religion. This religion kept people close together in villages and not spread apart like the South and Middle

The geography of the New England region and the Southern region differed from one another. For instance, New England had mountains and rocky soil. They also had a short growing season and both cold and warm weather. On the other hand, the South had plantations with fertile soil and flat lands. The South also had long growing seasons and warm weather. The New England and Southern regions had some similarities as well. For example, they both had many towns settled near the Atlantic Ocean or

The southern colonies used their natural resources to manufacture their goods, just as the New England colonies did. The natural resources differed greatly, according to the climate and soil in each region. New England did not have the soil to harvest staple crops as the southern colonies did, climates in the northern colonies were likely to be unfavorable for staple crops. Both regions comparatively utilized the natural resources in their regions in terms of trade and profit gain, although climate and natural resources differed.