preview

Drew Faust's This Republic Of Suffering

Good Essays

The identification of civilians’ bodies after genocides or political atrocities has received considerable attention in academia due to its social, judicial, and humanitarian implications. By contrast, the remains of soldiers have not been given enough attention. For one thing, soldiers are not always regarded as victims---they are trained to kill people and their deaths are deemed as battle casualties with less moral or legal consequence than civilians. For another, due to the destruction of bodies during battles, the necessity of quick troop maneuver, the loss of territory to enemies, or merely sanitary concerns that demand immediate disposal of bodies, abandoning soldiers’ remains in remote, unmarked graves is not beyond the imagination of …show more content…

The first war of this type is perhaps the American Civil War. Thousands of men died hundreds of miles away from home without being taken care of at their last moment, which contradicted the contemporary Victorian values. The mass casualties, combined with primitive communication methods, left many families uncertain about the fate of their loved ones. Drew Faust’s This Republic of Suffering, argues that these situations made the Union government realize that as the volunteer citizen soldiers had paid their ultimate price to save the country, the country was reciprocally responsible for accounting them and taking care of their remains. If the state left the duty to individual families to recover their loved ones, only the wealthy families could afford such practice, which was against the basic principles of democracy and equality that the Union fought for. She also argued that an accurate counting of casualties and the construction of national cemeteries demonstrated the recognition of their sacrifice by the country, thus to justify the tremendous price for defending the nation unity. The identification of the dead and their honorable burial or repatriation not only brought closure to their families, but also facilitated the distribution of pensions and back payment, which were also duties of a modern state with expanding …show more content…

Michael Allen’s book argues that the Vietnam War POW/MIA campaigns aimed at demonstrating the futile loss of human lives in an ill-planned war and assigning responsibility to the authorities. The leaders of such campaigns attempted to highlight their victimization and the memory of defeat in Vietnam in the context of post-Cold War triumphalism. The identification of soldiers’ remains, especially that of the Vietnam War Unknown in response to development in DNA technology and irresistible pressure from POW/MIA activists, symbolizes the country’s shift from the traditional mode of collective war commemoration to the individualization of the memory for war loss. According to Sarah Wagner, the public effort to associate the Vietnam War Unknown with Michael Blassie built a new connection between the justification of war and death with a nation distinguishes itself through its care for the war dead. The country’s response to the demand of the POW/MIA families to search and identify the Vietnam War missing is perceived by Thomas Hawley as a desperate but limitedly effective attempt of the authorities to revive a body politics irreparably weakened by the Vietnam War. He also argued that as the government recovers the remains from Vietnam and assumes the duty of their identification, it endeavors to assert its sovereignty over both

Get Access