preview

Electrophilic Aromatic Cation Lab Report

Satisfactory Essays

The purpose of this experiment was to perform a nitration of a monosubstituted arene by electrophilic aromatic substitution and the second part of the experiment was to determine the relative reactivities of five different arenes using electrophilic aromatic bromination.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

In electrophilic aromatic substitution, an atom that is attached to an aromatic compound is replaced by an electrophile. The stability of aromatic rings makes the need for a very strong electrophile for the molecule to be formed. Nitro-groups and halogens are good examples of the kind of electrophiles that should be used. The rate of the reaction and direction are affected by the electrophile. A carbocation intermediate is formed when the electrophile attacks one of the double bonds on the molecule and breaks it. The double bond can be reformed by a nucleophile that attacks it as a base. As stated, a very strong electrophilic ion is needed to change the stability of the aromatic ring. In the case of two electrophiles, the stronger one should be used to create the strong cation which can then break the double bond.

An aromatic compound with a functional group on it creates three different isomeric products because substitution can happen in either the otho-, meta-, …show more content…

The ring activating reactants were electron donating because they had electron lone pairs and therefore reacted faster. The reactants that were ring deactivating reacted slower because of they were attached to electron withdrawing groups. The reaction order from fastest to slowest was as predicted with phenol being the fastest, then anisole, 4-bromophenol, acetanilide, and diphenyl ether being the slowest due to the electron withdrawing group joined to it. These outcomes are constant with the concepts of ring activating and deactivating functional

Get Access