preview

Emerson And Yancey Summary

Decent Essays

Emerson and Yancey focused predominantly on the tension between blacks and whites. They debated over the best way to stop racial division. Their solutions fell into two main categories: those who argued that the majority group (whites) bear more responsibility for ending racial inequality through affirmative action and reparations, and those who argue that the responsibility ultimately resides with minority groups (non-whites) who support conformity and colorblindness to mainstream culture and beliefs/values. To show why these solutions would not work, Emerson and Yancey first offer a historical overview of racism in our American society. The core thesis of the book are two main ideas proposed as solutions to racial stress. They are put on a spectrum of - majority group obligations to minority group obligations- and most of these models fail because they fall too far to either sides of the spectrum. In place of these broken models, Emerson and Yancey came up with a new centrist model called the "mutual-obligations" approach. The basic disagreement is not all that debateable: white people and people of color have to agree on the solution if the solution is going to be successful.
It was stated that whites need to fix the broken system that we have created and gained …show more content…

This being despite constant growing evidence that race really does matter in the post-civil rights age, effective solutions are in short supply and as the authors talk about "mutual obligations." The authors brought up a nice analysis of American race inequality, focusing on the rise of white supremacy and the continuation of white privilege despite the removal of direct institutionalized segregation. Solving current racial problems seems nearly impossible because it requires addressing largely unseen forces of indirect institutional

Get Access