Engineering Ethics Of The Engineering Profession

The paper contains an analysis of the film “Incident at Morale”. The film in question follows Fred, a chemical engineer who is a professional engineer currently working for Phaust Chemicals to design a chemical plant. Fred faces many ethical dilemmas during the construction of the chemical plant. The following sections will analyze an ethical issue that occurred when Fred decided to use connectors that barely met the QC specs and was a danger to the employees. The method used to analyze the situation will contain nine steps used in assessing an ethical situation.

This workshop allowed us to compare codes of ethics from different professions and articulate how; personal, professional values, beliefs, and how perspectives influence ethical decision making. Within our groups, we discussed case

Chapter four of our textbook reveals the importance of ethics and goes into detail about what ethics is. The textbook directly states that “We define ethics as society’s accepted standard of moral behavior, that is, behavior accepted by society as right rather than wrong.” The article states that although ford made defective vehicles that there were no reported injuries because of them. However, because of ethics ford is recalling the vehicles before anyone gets hurt. This proves that Ford has good

Regarding the essence of ethics within NASA, it should be understood that the culture at the organization may be characterized the one in which as leaders do not clearly understand the nature of risks, faced by the company. Moreover, at NASA the use of logic along with reasoning each risk separately instead of testing the probability of failure plays a major role in the formation of total safety leadership. That is, the company pays more attention rather to the final outcome of the encountered problems, even if the process of their mitigation would be extremely unethical. There is a need for understanding that it is unacceptable to act following the principle “No harm intended, it’s just business,” (Launching Into Unethical Behavior, 2011).

Firstly, I want to discuss engineers’ ethical obligations as an employee. Engineers are hired and compensated for their work as employees. Thus, they have moral obligations to remain loyal and act as faithful trustees for their employers. Those obligations include engineers’ duty to act with honesty and integrity to the highest standards. For example, engineers are ethically required to work with reasonable care and skill at all time. They are compelled to inform

Repeatedly in the history of engineering have engineers been faced with the dilemma of deciding whether they should take action to correct wrongdoing by a party directly involved in their work []. The dilemma boils down to an ethical or moral debate. The engineers must choose between their allegiance to their employers and clients, or to the public they serve with their work. In many jurisdictions the option for engineers to take action, or blow the whistle, in these situations has become a required action, bound by the code of ethics many engineers are bound to uphold.

There is much that can be said of engineering in terms of Aristotle’s theory of virtue ethics. Engineers must strive to attain a high level of virtuosity in both the intellectual and moral categories, as engineers can make decisions that affect the welfare and the very lives of those that use the products of their labor. While Texas A&M University does present many relevant virtues to its students in their coursework, these are mostly intellectual virtues; moral virtues will have to come through practice in each of our individual

In his lecture, Professor Simmons makes reference to Engineers Australia, he states that, engineers have a moral duty to act on the base of a “well-informed conscience, be honest and trustworthy, and respect the intrinsic dignity of all persons.” Accordingly, this particular scenario predominately focuses on two of these underlying ethical principles; truthfulness and fairness.

The author presented the background of how the ASCE code of ethics has developed. The first ASCE code was primary emphasis on the members relationships and the it revised to include the obligation of the engineer to promote health, safety, and welfare of the public. In this article, the author comes up with a new code of ethics and accompanying guidelines to professional practice. He suggested ways in which the corresponding ASCE committees can follow to update the current version of the code of ethics and the guidelines to professional practice. The author suggested code of ethic and guidelines to professional practice in which regulates the relationship among fellow professionals, clients, and the public. He shows that the ASCE needs to put

The high tech organization’s activities during the launch of challenger have several ethical aspects of engineering, which are explained ahead. The inability of team to foresee the risk associated with the decision they made to launch the shuttle is one of the mistakes made by the team. On the other hand the team failed to see the failure of mission by not listening to other group of engineer, which also violates the ethical aspect of

The role of virtue ethics in engineering is one often overlooked by engineering students and those beginning this profession. The theory impounded by Ed Harris that described the importance of virtues to engineer’s is one I strongly agree with. Also, these ethical virtues can be applied and studied only because of Aristotle’s brilliantly clear and concise definition of ethical concepts.

As engineering students, we are taught the technical aspects of our field for four years. Suddenly, the curriculum throws an ethics class into the mix and we are told that ethics will be a substantial part of life as a practicing engineer. We see an example of the importance of this revelation in the recent case involving James Liang and the Volkswagen conspiracy. Engineers were assigned to create a “clean diesel” that would pass the stricter US emissions regulations. After realizing that this could not be accomplished, the engineers instead designed a device that would cheat the system. This device would make it appear that the emissions were within regulations when in reality the cars “spew[ed] up to 40 times the legally allowed amount of

Industrial Engineers often face the ethical dilemma of attempting to balance costs with quality and safety. Company management pressures Industrial systems engineers to design processes that are cost efficient, time constrained, and produce a high quality output. This puts the engineer in a tricky balancing act in which they are trying to make every stakeholder happy. Taking risks in order to create cost efficient solutions is not specific to only industrial engineers but applies to all disciplines of engineering, making this topic a relevant discussion. However, this conflict is especially true in a manufacturing setting where industrial engineers thrive, machine operators are often overworked, companies make products in high stakes, large batches, and the range of quality acceptance is growing ever smaller. A relevant example is the engineer who was designing a chemical plant in Mexico. In order to achieve the correct viscosity of the paint stripper, the engineer asked the plant operator to babysit the chemical mixture and manually release the valve when necessary. Engineering management’s decision puts the plant worker at a safety risk in order to achieve a tighter quality and standardization of the chemical stripper production process. Ultimately, this resulted in the catastrophic death of the plant worker and the destruction of the plant.

When talking about engineering, people would probably have pictures in their mind of engineers using machines producing parts, drawing and sketching designs, or even doing some mathematical calculations. A more general answer to what engineers actually do would be that they solve social problems through the use of machines, devices, systems, materials and processes. They are all absolutely correct. But in reality, both the job and the role of an engineer are more complicated. They do not only have to work with machines and designs. Engineers are often involved in communications and negotiations. They have to work with different people and the responsibility that they have is massive. Important decisions are made by them and they have to use their own judgement. And very often, ethical considerations are already built into the decisions they make. In order to make the best decisions, they have to be understood in the context of their role in society and, moreover, they need to develop good ethical awareness and be able to deal with the dilemmas that they have to face every day.

At the outset morals and innovation appear to have no collaboration. On the other hand, we see the impact of morals on innovation both from the calling and the general population. Case in point the "code of expert morals" has changed the techniques in distinctive parts of science, building and innovation, and has given a specific heading to the sorts of tasks done, their degree, and executions. The affectability of customers to pick good values has additionally brought about the alter of course for some advances. Open investment in science and innovation and the legitimate stations are alternate components that shape the impact of morals on engineering. All the more disputably on the other side we see the effect of engineering on morals. One can contend how and why the absolute most theoretical thoughts like regulating moral hypotheses or Kantian morals have been responses to the progressions in science and engineering. Also, the impacts of mechanical change have significantly impacted cutting edge relativistic morals. Innovation has given new potential outcomes to human life and made new moral inquiries as well. It could be said, "Connected morals" is the result of mechanical improvement.