September 11, 2001, shown America how vulnerable they were. We failed short in so many ways, such as the lack of information sharing internally or externally that push us to a new era of concern to protect the United States from terrorism. Intelligence serves as a critical factor in decision making, planning, strategic targeting, and crime prevention. That event sparked a collaborative partnership with state and local law enforcement agencies, the DHS Office of Intelligence and Analysis, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Field Intelligence Group (FIG) and Joint Terrorism Task Forces (JTTF), and the National Guard, as well as civilian analysts, members of the military and private companies to form the fusion center to focus on national …show more content…
I think the fusion centers should be applied to the smaller police departments due to national security. At this point, no entity should be exempt from fighting the war on terrorism or crime to keep our citizens safe. Furthermore, to make this connection with the fusion centers the law enforcements must have the understanding of the current intelligences and threats. Our nation focuses on the evolving threat levels from the borderlines of America to capturing homegrown radical extremists in our communities. We cannot discount any threat to the U.S. soil. Although, there may be some scuffle between the law enforcement agencies’ structure, mission and day to day operation with fusion centers initiatives on an all-crimes and/or all-hazards approach. Over time, they will sync their efforts due to the fusion centers having an extra set of eyes to detect and terminate unusual behaviors and activity before it manifests into a more serious offense against the United States. But most importantly, having a partnered relationship will be beneficial to all by sharing information could possibly cut done on wasted time to focus more on important issues. It is imperative for them to find common ground to accomplish the mission that is critical to the safety of our
While the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is one, centralized agency, securing the homeland involves the cooperation and collaboration of many, different agencies and organizations ranging from local law enforcement to national agencies such as the NSA, CIA, and FBI. Each of these agencies contributes to the development of homeland security intelligence. By carefully analyzing and commenting on the objectives, tasks, strengths, weaknesses, and roles of each agency, a larger picture emerges regarding the capabilities and limitation of intelligence in supporting homeland security efforts.
Homeland Security is characterized by crime control being the primary police function. It is best achieved through a collective effort by all law enforcement agencies. One of the strategies being used is Intelligence Led Policing. This strategy is not new, it can be traced back to the British is the 1990’s (Bailey, 2011). Intelligence Led Policing is an approach to crime that deals with all crimes and threats including terrorism. This approach is unique because it is threat driven instead of incident driven. It also is a long term approach and focuses on causes and conditions that add to crime through a collection of data.
As stated earlier, the 9/11 attacks revealed the indomitable spirit of the US and awakened a sleeping giant, which was very reminiscent of the US response following the attacks by the Japanese on US forces in Hawaii. Both 9/11 and Pearl Harbor attacks galvanized the American people into action and caused the government to heavily invest resources to combat enemies of the US; the Axis enemies during World War II and “the terrorists”, wherever they may be located, following 9/11. One of the first NIST deficiencies to be corrected were the operational protocols for intra- and inter-agency communication. This, in part, has been addressed in the Incident Command System (ICS) since the purpose of ICS is to integrate operations between public safety entities at all levels of government.
Fusion centers will contribute to state, local, and federal law enforcement agencies in many different ways. The main contribution is the coordination of all agencies exchanging real time information, packaged up and sent out to the individuals on the street. That information can now be accessed by anyone working a particular case. In turn this information can help to resolve a potential crime before it happens or help to apprehend a potential suspect.
The formation of fusion centers is a step in the right direction to countering terrorist threats. By working efficiently and appropriately, information leading to arrests can be shared across county lines, state lines, and all around the world in a timely manner. Fusion centers can make law enforcement agencies more competent and effective in stopping crimes (to include terrorist attacks) before they take place. As long as the centers follow the laws they are governed by, they will remain ethical and can be a helpful addition in protecting the United States. Fusion centers in the United States perform a valuable role in countering terrorist threats, their positive influence far
-To those of you who are still unaware, every day we are under the threat of both external and internal threats to our society. For example many still remember the tragedy of 9/11; many innocent lives were lost that day and many attribute the blame to poor information sharing between agencies. Fusion centers were the answer to prevent
Fusion Center was established as the bridge between federal, state and local law enforcement. The need for information sharing among federal, state and local enforcement was established after September 11 attack. Fusion Centers " primary goals are maintaining situational awareness with the state and region, identifying and anticipating both criminal and non criminal threats, and facilitating interagency communication and coordination activities based on these assessment. The analysis and use of the information and intelligence lies at the heart of their activities or should enabling the organization to better define and achieve their varied goals"(Joyal, 2012). Fusion center plays a vital role in enabling effective communication of locally
According to Jones (2011), the strength of fusion centers is called "Epistemic Federalism" (p. 178). Epistemic Federalism allows local agencies to utilize an approach that is taken from their perspective. The fusion center encompasses federal; state, local, tribal, territorial (SLTT); and private sector partners, but the state and local government plays more of a substantial role with the gathering of information. Local agencies deal with the public on a daily bases and their mission is to protect and serve the public. This connection allows local agencies to gain more information from the public, especially when they suspect something suspicious. As stated by Jones (2011), the local agencies are more adept at identify terrorist cells, than
Some have expanded their focus to included public safety matters and major threats. Fusions don't just collect information, they integrate new date into existing information, they determine its worth, analyze it for links and trends, and disseminate their findings to the appropriate agency in the best position to do something about it. The FBI has 114 employees working in 38 fusion centers, 36% are agents, 61% are intelligence analysts, and the rest are language specialists, financial analysts. State and local enforcement agencies get acces to certain federal databases and the benefit of big picture terrorism, grant funding, technical assistance, and training. The FBI investigate anywhere even overseas. With fusion centers in our city everybody feels safer at night sleeping peacefully without having to worry about anything bad
Since the attacks on September 11th, 2001, intelligence activities has been one of the most controversial issues facing this country with one of the most controversial being the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Created in November of 2002 and concepted just two weeks after the attacks, the DHS focuses in five goals; prevent terrorism and enhance security, secure and manage the borders, enforce and administer immigration laws, safeguard and secure cyberspace,
Intelligence is a dependable instrument of its own to generate information that establishes the base of National Security in the United States. Intelligence has been used since the beginning of history to provide information on enemy threats and how to prevent a mass disasters. It has been used for wars, national security, military tactics, etc. Intelligence has been available since the revolutionary war and our first president George Washington and other leaders of the world have used intelligence to protect their countries. Intelligence is the dominant and the backbone of homeland Security and it is ceaseless learning about it. National Intelligence agents train tirelessly to fight and create
In the State of New York, fusion center is a perfect example of information technology optimizing their performance in reducing crime within their police departments. The New York/New Jersey High Intensity Drug Trafficking Center serves as an information hub for law enforcement. According to (Johnson, 2008), the mass of intelligence data in the central location has proved to be a key factor in identifying individuals and organizations that are facilitating or carrying out terrorist activity in New York City.
The United States Intelligence community draws on advanced technology and analytical techniques. An intelligence process that sets objectives, collects, analyzes, and report findings, with feedback loops integrated throughout. Explicitly, the intelligence community advantages technology and tradecraft within a proscribed process. However, estimation of threats and decision-making are outcomes of human thinking. Analysts and policymakers create mental models, or short cuts to manage complex, changing environments. In other words, to make sense of ambiguous or uncertain situations, humans form cognitive biases. Informed because of personal experience, education, and specifically applied to intelligence analysis, Davis
Intelligence collection and apprehension of criminals have occurred for many years; however, with the exception of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, these actions were performed by different organizations. Nonetheless, roles and responsibilities have changed since the attacks on September 11, 2001. Intelligence-led policing and the National Criminal Intelligence Sharing program were incorporated, and fusion centers were established to help gather intelligence from different levels of the government. Although law enforcement at the local, state, and tribal levels aid in intelligence collection, it is important to ensure that intelligence gathered to protect national security and law enforcement
Fusion centers were created to improve the efficiency of the state and local level of homeland security. "Fusion centers are owned and operated by state and local entities with support from federal partners in the form of deployed personnel, training, technical assistance, exercise support, security clearances, connectivity to federal systems, technology, and grant funding." (U.S. National Intelligence, 2013, p. 20). This initiative is extremely beneficial, because the state level does not always have the means to comb through data. Training also proves to be a costly burden the state cannot always fund. At the national and international level, the country utilizes the National Security Agency (NSA) and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). Fusion centers are been extremely effective, because the intelligence gathered in this manner is much more relevant in terms of locale. For example, if the FBI acquires some intelligence about New York City, it does not do much good for California. If California focuses more on itself with the fusion