Hydro Fracking Research Paper

Hydraulic fracturing increases the growth of not only jobs, but the economy as well. Ever since the start of fracking in the 1990s,

As natural resources continue to diminish, alternative became more of necessity. Coal and oil consumption cannot replenish as fast as it is consumed, in which the resources will inevitably be exhausted. The people became optimistic regarding natural gas found in the United States. Drilling companies try to extract natural gas through hydraulic fracking; however, this process pose ethical concerns. While drilling for natural gas, methane can leak into the atmosphere, leading to global warming. In addition, careless fracking protocol could lead to groundwater contamination. As the petroleum engineering sector grows, new engineers from many disciple will be entering the field. Ethical standards are must be upheld while drilling, which is why the NSPE Code of Ethics for Engineers and the SPE Code of Ethics provides standards that petroleum engineers must follow. Following these codes will allow petroleum engineers to conduct natural gas drilling in an ethical manner while preserving the environment and have financial gains. The inquiry will start by explaining what hydraulic fracturing is, and then explain the benefits of this procedure and the risk. The issue will then be analyze using Kantian ethics and utilitarian ethics. I will determine whether or not the action

This is even more important because so many Americans lost their jobs as oil and gas production, "with the number of employees in oil and gas with the number of employees in oil and gas extraction shrinking by over 50 percent to 118,400 in 2003" (Hassett and Mathur). Americans were losing jobs in gas production starting from the early twenty-first century due to the fact that "easily tapped oil reserves grew scarcer and domestic oil production declined", until improvements in fracking for shale gas created more jobs(Hassett and Mathur). The jobs fracking creates is much needed to boost the sagging American economy, but even more important to the economy is the gas produced.

If the practice of fracking continues without the necessary regulation and management to construct the infrastructure required for extraction, transportation and consumerization, the practice has the potential to generate serious problems.

During the mid 2000s hydraulic fracking was starting to grow because ‘It was a good way to meet energy needs.”(source 5). Hydraulic fracking has been said to release chemicals and pollute drinking water.

The job of fracking constitutes of gas being released to supply both Australia and overseas countries. Administrators and workers take this process seriously as every cubic foot of gas is measured and supplied. Although potential health problems have been recognized, the companies have been focusing on the collection grid and the and the shortage of regional community employees as only 2% of the workforce is applied for the job. Another economical factor is that Fracking is destroying jobs in other industries. These include manufacturing, tourism and agriculture as well as gas related fields. This caused a major problem in for farmers as they live on rent as well as the decrease of jobs is becoming difficult to maintain that wage. Furthermore, as the natural is supplied throughout the world, citizens must pay double or triple the prices in the upcoming years due to this fracking site.

The negative of the “supply-side” management strategy is: the contamination due to fracking for creating wells and bottling to store water, and deadly levels of arsenic in ARS wells. On other side, the positive of the “supply-side” management strategy is that Its projected that with the use of a 15 gallon reservoirs and a 66 gallon water treatment plants can be cut down 1/3 of groundwater usage. We must use desalination plants, wells, bottling, and reservoirs to counteract the rainwater cannot naturally replenish the aquifers because of the human developments covering the ground.

Feeds the LaVale wells at Red Hill and many local wells. If drilling were to occur in

Protagonists concur that the process of fracking is commonly short-lived, and after it is completed, oil and gas production have the ability to last up to 40 years. Once the process is completed, the site on which hydraulic fracturing is conducted on is restored and refurbished to its former state, and its environmental advantages, such as lowering greenhouse gas emissions and condensing air, persist for decades (“What Is Shale Gas?” 2). Shale gas, which is a natural gas extracted from shale, is obtained through fracking as well (“What Is Shale Gas?” 1). The EIA reports that over 750 trillion cubic feet of technically recoverable shale gas and 24 billion barrels of technically recoverable shale oil resources in discovered shale plays (“What Is Shale Gas?” 1). The key to developing these key resources, which fuel our economy and provide employment opportunity, is through fracking. When skeptical citizens and authority express concern over fracking, protagonists assure their challengers that fracking will always be done responsibly, and they will continue to develop

When the competition for a vital resource is between residents and crops, human health and wellbeing takes precedence as a matter of policy. When this competition is between one group of residents and another group of residents, the only solution is to spread the resource even thinner often leading to inequities among citizens of differing financial or political influence. Decision-makers should have a zero tolerance agenda concerning any threat to our groundwater resources. This paper proposes that future growth needs to take into account our dependence on surface and subsurface water resources when planning developments and incorporating water resource studies into legislation meant to guide further development in New Jersey. The impact on citizens affected by new construction may not be felt until a crisis occurs and then it will be too late. With the remaining southwestern agricultural counties ripe for development it's never too late to change our vision of the landscape and refuse to gamble with the future needs of our citizens.

The process of hydraulic fracturing – shooting water, sand, and chemicals at high pressure into underground wells to release natural gas – is a divisive issue: Some say it dumps chemicals into ground water supplies, others argue it causes earthquakes, and still others think it can revolutionize America’s energy industry.

Today I am arguing a case for the Boulder Dam. It will be located in the Black Canyon of the Colorado River on the border between Nevada and Arizona. The dam will provide hydroelectric power for places like Los Angeles, Las Vegas, Phoenix and other urban center. Originally, farmers had made an attempt to redirect the Colorado through the use of canals, but these canals broke in 1905 and the dam is a viable replacement. Not only will it provide water and hydroelectric power to the developing southwest, it can control the seasonal flooding of the Colorado River and irrigate land in California’s Imperial Valley. Although the construction will be expensive, the power it produces will cover the costs. This would help farmers and other workers in the southwest and the construction can provide thousands of jobs for laborers. I was once concerned that the water will primarily go to California, but Herbert Hoover brokered a compact in 1922, the Colorado River Compact, to divide the water proportionally among the seven states. President Calvin Coolidge will hopefully authorize the Boudler Canyon Project to end the legal wrangling of the

Governor Brown’s “Water Action Plan” is very clear and concise plan for the local governments to follow when managing the groundwater. The plan has a clear definition of the challenges that are present for the use water. There is a brief overview of the challenges and how the plan will address the issues. The first proposed a plan is for the administration to increase the funding and expand the California Statewide Groundwater Elevation Monitoring Program, “which provides essential data to characterize the state 's groundwater basins, including identifying basins in decline” (cite). This will open lines of communication between counties, and share valuable information for development the pumping plans. Next, there is the plan for Brown’s administration to work closely together with Legislation to fund the

Hydraulic fracturing is a process used in nine out of 10 natural gas wells in the United States, where millions of gallons of water, sand and chemicals are pumped underground to break apart the rock and release the gas. Scientists are worried that the chemicals used in fracturing may pose a threat either underground or when waste fluids are handled and sometimes spilled on the surface. The natural gas industry defends hydraulic fracturing, better known as fracking, as safe and efficient. Thomas J. Pyle, president of the Institute for Energy Research, a pro-industry non-profit organization, claims fracking has been “a widely deployed as safe extraction technique,” dating back to 1949. What he doesn’t say is that until recently energy

Brusch C. & Nakayama M. (2005). Public Participation in the Governance of International Freshwater Resources. New York: United Nations University Press.