preview

Inter-Professional Team Model Analysis

Decent Essays

Inter-Professional Team Model (PAARP) is used throughout the life cycle of a team and includes 5 phases describing actions of the interprofessional teams: purpose, assemble and charter, align, resource, perform. The division of labor is based on the scopes of practice of team members and takes into account KSAs of team members. In the PAARP model, actions of leadership give purpose to the group, and consistency of action by the leader is essential. Identifying purpose through goal-setting plays a large part in this theory and team members accept the goals of the team as their own and take responsibility for their part in achieving them. This model is applicable across health professionals through an understanding of each discipline’s roles …show more content…

The challenge is to focus the KSAs of organizational leaders and to empower the total organization to reach its strategic vision while competing successfully in an industry that constantly changes. Consistency of management and leadership at all levels of a health organization are paramount in this model due to the increasingly dynamic nature of the healthcare environment and global market. Like PAARP, DCL is used as a sequential system to lead and manage, whereas the reframing model is more episode specific. The DCL Model is intended to fit within the situational and transformational leadership paradigm with an emphasis on organizational culture development. Leaders shape culture through attention, reaction to crisis, role-modeling, allocation of resources, and selection and dismissal criteria (Ledlow & Stephens, 2017). Leadership in this model is recognized at the personal level, the team level and the organizational level. Both descriptive (model constructs) and high level prescriptive (process constructs) of leadership and management of resources are …show more content…

The methodology is designed to allow leaders to consider the organization from different angles, in order to develop a multi-perspectival approach to innovation and change. Each frame (structural, human resource, political, and symbolic) can be applied to an organization in order to view it more clearly from a different frame of reference to find the most effective solution and strategy for advancement. I liken this model to “seeing is believing.” Sometimes an organization is seeing the wrong picture and doesn’t understand why it’s not getting the result it wants. The four frames allow leaders to see organizations in their complexity and think critically about alternative possibilities for change. They help to clarify reality and actually see what’s happening. An example would be FEMA’s response to Hurricane Irma. All frames were used to make a true assessment of events and quickly assemble appropriate leadership intervention. (Structural: environmental infrastructure and function, Human Resources: American Red Cross efforts and charity distribution, Political: both Houston and Florida struggling for power and resources, Symbolic: bringing a diverse group of individuals together into a cohesive team.) Through time, effort, and repetitive practice FEMA was able to use the four frames

Get Access