Investigative Court Cases

I feel that this case was somewhat representative of what was discussed in the textbook. The forensics aspects of this case were generally different from the impression of forensics I received from reading the textbook. Despite this fact, I feel that the investigative techniques of this case were similar to what was discussed in the textbook, as well as what has been discussed during lecture.

The family has been determined indigent for services. Samkisha has received public defender services for her criminal matters and Mrs. Beale has received Medicaid since she was 16 years of age. Mrs. Beale disclosed she is court ordered to receive child support in the amount of $202 per month from Mr. Robinson for Samkisha, but stated he seldom make payments of such. She also reported she receives unemployment in the amount of $204 per week and Social Security Income (SSI) for Samkisha in the amount of $670 per month.

The concept of Judicial Review is to review cases using the power of the courts over the actions of the executive and legislative branches to deem them invalid or unconstitutional. The Supreme Court has a unique position because of its broad commitment to the American People and its Constitution. The Court's principles on judicial review are that The Constitution is the supreme law of the country, they have ultimate authority on constitutional matters, and they must vote against any law that clashes with the constitution. One of the most significant cases that brought forth such convictions was the case of Marbury vs. Madison in 1803. Which was a case that brought many complications because when Jefferson ordered his Secretary of State James

Sgt. Grimm stated that on August 23, 2014, he performed a 1450X2347 tour as the patrol supervisor and PO Derek Almeida was his operator. At about 2008 hours, he responded to a radio run of a 10-34 male stabbed at 37 Weirfield Street. Upon arrival, he observed a male black [Mr. Carlton Smit h Jr.] bleeding heavily. The male black stated [to him] that his father had just stabbed him, while pointing to a black SUV driving away from the scene. Sgt. Grimm stated that he reiterated what the victim had said [to him] and he stated yes, my father just stabbed me. Shortly after, they followed the identified vehicle and subsequently pulled it over on Bushwick Avenue and Hancock Street. Sgt. Grimm Stated that as they approached the vehicle they notice blood all over the driver's side door. Mr. Carlto n Smith was properly identified and placed under arrest. Sgt. Grimm doesn't recalled who the UMOS that were present at the scene.

On February 21st, 2017 at approximately 1550 hours, my partner Officer Presley #2100 and I responded to 598 Dolores St., in a marked patrol vehicle in full uniform, regarding a possible dog attack and fight in progress.

UPDATE #2: On October 18, 2016, nearly one year after Peyton's arrest, the St. Clair County Circuit Court ordered him to be released from jail and into his father's custody.

staff the emergency room operated by the Plaintiff at its hospital facility as evidenced by the on call schedules maintained by the Plaintiff beginning in October of 2011.

1. Ladies and gentleman of the jury. First, I like to thank you for your attention and service. Now, I like to direct your attention to what this case is all about, and that is pain. Pain inflicted on two separate individual. It was that defendants financial pain, that cause Ms. Fitzgerald physical pain, mental pain, and emotional pain.

Many states use preliminary hearings instead of grand jury. Each of these legal institutions serves to avoid misjudged criminal prosecutions. Without this protection it could be that more accused had to wait in jail for a trial without an initial evaluation of the evidence against them. Preliminary hearings and grand juries protect people from unfounded accusations by the government.

Shortly thereafter, these guys tossed buoys to the pontoon and pulled out a white female, Bridgett Jones, who was complaining of injuries to her left arm. She was walked into the guard shack and stated that her injuries were caused by being slammed into the wall because of the wind and waves, while these men were pulling her out. Next, a young white male, Joey Oteck, was pulled out and brought into the guard shack. Then another white female, Cindy Thompson, was pulled out. A lady who stated she was a registered nurse, tried to set Bridgett’s arm but did not have the necessary items. EMS was contacted to check out these

In my opinion, the charges should have been dismissed against the individuals that pleaded guilty through plea bargain. The reason is that the lawsuit was able to illustrate that the prosecutor was racially motivated to incarcerated American Americans, even if they were innocent. Secondly, there was no strong evidence introduced that would uphold a conviction. The tape recordings that they had were alleged to drug transition occurring, however, you could not hear anything but noise in the background. In addition, the credibility of the confidential informant was questioned, because his stories was switching back and forth indicating that it was possibly fabricated. Lastly, the military drug sweep was achieved unlawfully without the use of

There are many different types of crimes that occur on a daily basis in this country; from homicide to petty theft to white collar crime. Due to the diversity and variation of these illegal activities, it would be imprudent not to have courts that are specialized to the vast majority of individuals who commit these crimes. This paper will discuss the different types of problem solving courts that exist, along with what kind of offenders they deal with. Furthermore, this paper will also discuss the advantages and disadvantages of specialized problem-solving courts and whether they are truly effective.

There are a few court rulings that have had an impact on the juvenile courts. The case of in re Gault Gerald Gault and his friend made some prank phone calls to a neighbor and she recognized their voice and turned them in to the authorities. The two young men were arrested without notify their parents and went to trail where without a witness or representation he was found guilty and sentenced (Siegel, Schmalleger & Worrall, 2014). The Supreme Courts later decided that juveniles are due the same process as adults as far as having a counsel, have witness present at trial and no self-incrimination (Siegel, Schmalleger & Worrall, 2014). In re Winship set the standard for reasonable doubt in juvenile cases, Thompson v. Oklahoma and Roper v. Simmons set the age that a juvenile could be given the death penalty to 18 years of age (Siegel, Schmalleger & Worrall, 2014).

The third matter that you want me to comment is in regard your appointment as judicial conduct commissioner. Your previous career was a legal academic, you had held this position at the University of Adelaide since being admitted to the profession on 30th June 2008. Since that date, you have held a practising certificate. Your question is whether your appointment is valid or not. The Act has provision for the appointment of a judicial conduct commissioner. Section 7 of the Act is very clear on the appointment of the judicial conduct commissioner. Subsection 1 provides that the commissioner will be appointed by the governor for a term that does not exceed seven years and conditions to be determined by the governor. No person should hold that

From its early beginnings till present day, race and race matters (Bell, 1989, 1993; West, 1994) have been and continue to be a powerful variable in this country. Interestingly, one venue where race issues have been addressed and fought over has been this country’s judicial system. In fact, for close to two hundred years, it could be argued that the courts facilitated and sustained the marginalization of non-whites in this country. Two prominent 19th century court cases that set the foundation for said marginalization were the Dred Scott v Sandford and Plessy v Ferguson cases, both highlighting this country’s de jure segregation laws. Indeed, sociologist Joe Feagin, in his influential book, Racist America, writes, “Every part of the life cycle,