preview

Juxtaposition In The Things They Carried

Decent Essays

There are times when things can be characterized by one specific quality. An entity can be black or white with no gray space in between. However, war is a different story. To those involved in a war, it can be far more enigmatic than one may assume. In The Things They Carried by Tim O’Brien, the author’s structural choices convey the subjectivity of truth during the war. Tim O’Brien uses juxtaposition in order to prove the point that war is neither black nor white; but rather something of a more paradoxical nature. While describing the qualities of a war story in the chapter, “How to Tell a True War Story,” O’Brien explains the varying truths that follow soldiers after they endure the conditions of war. “In war you lose your sense of the definite, …show more content…

He does this throughout the book, as he uses differing perspectives to describe the same events. This, once again, pushes forth the idea that in war there is more than one truth. When describing Kiowa’s death, O’Brien tells the story from multiple perspectives, two of which being those of Jimmy Cross and Norman Bowker. In the chapter, “Speaking of Courage”, Tim O’Brien tells the story of Kiowa’s death from Norman Bowker’s point of view. This version of the story is more numb, and it describes all of the external qualities of the situation. O’Brien tells of what Bowker absorbed with his senses. “He heard the valves in his heart. He heard the quick, feathering action of the hinges. Extraordinary, he thought. As he came up, a pair of red flares puffed open, a soft fuzzy glow, and in the glow he saw Kiowa’s wide-open eyes settling down into the scum” (O’Brien 149). Bowker saw the situation as a bystander, watching Kiowa’s death. He still felt the mourning that came with the death, yet he didn’t feel the same guilt portrayed through Jimmy Cross’ version of the story. In the chapter, “In the Field,” O’Brien tells Jimmy Cross’ perspective of Kiowa’s passing. He views it as a crime, and rather than describing the event through his senses, he described it with his guilt. “He should’ve moved to higher coordinates, should’ve radioed in false coordinates. There was nothing he could do now, but still it was a mistake and a hideous waste” (O’Brien 164). He felt responsible for what had happened, and that was reflected in what he believed to be his truth about the occurrence. He carried it with him in a more personal way than Norman Bowker, who had just watched the death happen. The differing perspectives on the same event show how differently one thing could affect two people during the war, showing the varying levels

Get Access