Leading Teams at West Coast Transit Ericka Rauf Grand Canyon University MGT-605 October 28, 2014 Leading Teams at West Coast Transit Selecting a team from the member profile to collaborate on a West Coast Transit marketing project took deep thought and consideration. Everyone brings strengths and weaknesses to the company. First, I choose Natalie. Natalie works well on a team, is positive and ambitious. She works well in tense situation which is needed for this high stress project. Natalie has strong written communication skills as well, which is an added bonus. The next person I choose was Elizabeth. She enjoys collaboration, has a positive attitude is diplomatic and open minded. She is a detailed oriented, has a good work …show more content…
Michael is currently working on his PhD and has plans to leave the company. I will assume that he may not have the time or desire to commit to this high- stress project. I also don’t think his personality will fit within the group members. He is passive-aggressive and can take things personally. I did not choose Bob, though he has been with the company from the beginning, he tends to over-react and can be unprofessional. Finally Tiffany was not chosen because I don’t think she would contribute much to the group. She is jaded and cynical, not a good combination when working on a team under stress I believe McClelland’s Need Theory is the best motivational theory to apply to this group of team members. Everyone chosen in the group appears to have a high need for achievement. His theory also states the following. “Achievement-motivated people share three common characteristics: (1) they prefer working on tasks of moderate difficulty; (2) they prefer situations in which performance is due to their efforts rather than to other factors, such as luck; and (3) they desire more feedback on their successes and failures than do low achievers”( Kreitner & Kinicki, 2013, p.209). If this project is a successful one, the reward in the form of positive feedback will be rewarding to the group. This project could be what determines the future of this company. All three of the characteristic in McClelland’s theory apply to this
Please answer all questions in this exam. Answers to the multiple choice questions need to be filled in on the scantron sheets (remember to use pencil to fill in the circles) and also circled on the exam itself. Answers to the short answer questions should go in the exam booklet provided. All three components (scantron sheets, exam booklets, paper copy of exam) should be turned in at the conclusion of the exam.
Buchanan, A. H. (2001). Organizational Behaviour:An Introductory Text (4 ed.). (F. T. Hall, Ed.) Pearson Education.
The final team member chosen was for the position of linker/producer. Marcell seemed to be the natural choice for this position. The single most important factor that made Marcell seem to be the best choice for this position was his proven ability to identify the deliverable or objective in any given situation. In the position of linker/producer, the ability to coordinate, integrate, provide directions, and follow through were areas that I felt best suited Marcell’s skill set. Marcell’s excellent project management skills and his ability to keep people on track were also important factors that I considered when making this choice.
Kreitner, R., & Kinicki, A. (2013). Organizational behavior (10th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin. Retrieved from
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2015). Organizational behavior (16th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. (Note: Refer to Chapter 3)
Over the course of this semester, Organizational Behavior has highlighted numerous topics, which concentrated on
Colquitt, J., Lepine, J., & Wesson, M. (2013). Organizational behavior: Improving performance and commitment in the workpla
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2011). Organizational Behavior (14th Edition). Boston, MA: Prentice Hall.
Bloisi, W., Cook, C. & Hunsaker, P.(2003). Management and Organisational Behavior: European Edition. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill Education
References:Huczynski, A. A. and Buchanan, D. A. (2007) Organizational behaviour: An introductory text. 6th ed., Harlow: Financial Times Prentice Hall.
Baldwin, T. T., Bommer, W. H., & Rubin, R. S. (2012). Managing organizational behavior: What great managers know and do.
Colquitt, J. et al (2011). Organizational Behavior: Improving Performance and Commitment in the Workplace (2 ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
EMBA Program – Organizational Behavior Version 4.1 1st Version: 15 April 2013 This Version: 20 April 2013
Organizational behavior is the behavior of individuals, either one or a group. It is not the behavior of an organization, but rather the behavior of the people in an organization. This can be anywhere from a family at home to a church to a work group within a company. Some of the challenges that make behaviors challenging in today’s workplace are high performance, ethical behavior, productivity improvement, technology utilization, quality, diversity, work-life balance, and the global economy, (Schermerhorn, 2003, P. 1).
I will use Vroom 's (1964) "expectancy theory "in order to analyse the level of motivation by our group members. According to Mento, Cartledge and Locke (1980), Expectancy theory emphasises that the motivation to perform is dependent on "the strength of the expectancy that the act will be followed by a certain outcome (reward)". It focuses on three relationships: Effort-performance, performance-reward and reward-personal goal. (Reinharth, Leon, Wahba, Mahmoud, 1975) In order for the motivation to be maximized, these relationships must be positive. According to a non directive qualitative interview of 10 minutes with each group member, I found the first relationship to be strongly positive, i.e. all of the members admitted that their effort would lead to a certain performance.