Mbv vs Rbv

Porter has identified five (5) competitive forces that shape every industry and every market. The forces determine the intensity of competition and hence the profitability and attractiveness of an industry. Based on the information derived from this analysis, management can decide how to influence or to exploit particular characteristics of this industry.

This article has started revolutionary thinking about what are the different forces in addition to direct competitors that affect competitive strategy of an organization and how better understanding of industry structure and these forces, also known as " Porter 's Five Forces", derive organization 's strategy to achieve sustainability and higher profitability. Author has explained the other factors that contribute for industry structure like industry growth rate, technology and innovation, external factors, government & regulations and complementary products and services. Industry structure changes while responding to changes in competitive forces. Author also discussed the framework to perform industry analysis and avoid common pitfall while conducting analysis. In this review I will summarize five competitive forces explained by Micheal E. Porter and their implication on organization 's strategy. Further, I will discuss the relevancy of Porter 's five forces framework in current scenario.

The intensity of rivalry, which is the most obvious of the five forces in an industry, helps determine the extent to which the value created by an industry will be dissipated through head-to-head competition. The most valuable contribution of Porter's “five forces” framework in this issue may be its suggestion that rivalry, while important, is only one of several forces that determine industry attractiveness.

Awareness of the five forces can help a company understand the structure of its industry and stake out a position that is more profitable and less vulnerable to attack. By understanding how the five competitive forces that shape strategy influences profitability in a particular industry, executives can develop a strategy for enhancing their company’s long-term profits (Porter, 2014).

The ‘five forces’ model was created by Michael Porter of Harvard University and consists of three horizontal forces of competition, as well as two vertical forces of competition. The horizontal forces of competition are comprised of: 1) the threat of new entrants; 2) the threat of rivals who have already been established; and 3) the threat of substitute services or products. The vertical forces of competition include the bargaining power of customers, as well as the bargaining power of suppliers.

As we begin to strategically plan for our business, it is important for us to take a deep dive into our competitive environment to understand where we are strong competitively and where we are weak competitively. An analysis of the forces driving industry competition using M.E. Porter’s Five Forces Model will assist us in determining where the power lies in a business situation as we begin to plan. We must understand how they work in our industry and how they affect our particular situation. Whatever the collective strength of these forces is, our job as the strategists of the organization is to

Zappos, as the first and the world’s largest online shoes retailer, has developed a high quality experience and delivered “wow” to customers. It has established a strong relationship with customer and stick to bring the store to the customer’s home. It has used less twenty yeas to become a profitable company holding an outstanding reputation for customer service and its employee are passionately engage in their works. In this paper, I aimed to analyze the relationship between strategic capabilities and performance in Zappos’s success. The business environment is not constant rather than changeable, so how Zappos goes ahead of revival and forms its unique competency advantages. I will utilize VRIO test to detect the company’s level of competitive advantage. In addition, I will continually combine Barney’ theory of resource based view(RBV) with Zappos to identified which resources it processes and how Zappos used those to form its core competency.

The resource-based view emphasizes the internal accumulation of firms’ resources and capabilities that contribute to firms’ development (Peteraf, 1993). Resources include all assets, attributes, knowledge, etc. (Barney, 1991), which enables the firm to implement

Porter's Five Forces can be applied to particular companies, market segments and industries with the step-by-step analysis of market structure and competitive situation. First of all, when implementing this module in organizations, it is necessary to determine the scope of the market to be analyzed. Following, all relevant forces for this market analyzed and key forces are identified (Gerry and Kevan, P.117). Actually some organizational strategy and the longer-term goals are mainly based on or consistent with the key forces. Hence, it is not necessary to analyze all elements of all competitive forces with the same depth. Moreover, the key forces in the competitive environment will vary in different industry. Different forces take on prominence in shaping competition in each industry (Porter,

This article summarizes the key ideas and gives an overview of how this concepts works. Describes, how this five competitive forces shape every organization and every market. Summarizes how these forces will define the power of profitability, competitiveness, and attractiveness of the industry. Depending on the facts which is derived from the five forces analysis, the management of organizations will decide how to effect or abuse specific features of their industries.

The threat of substitutes is the availability of a product that the consumer can purchase instead of the industry’s product (Free management books, n,d ). A substitute product is a product that produced by other industry and offer similar benefits to the customer as the product produced by the firms within the industry. The threat of substitutes can affect the competitive environment for the firm in that industry and also influence the profitability of the industry. This threat affects profitability of the industry because the consumers can choose to purchase similar product from other industry to instead of the company’s product. Besides that, the more the close substitute product can make the industry more competitive and decrease the profit potential of the firm in the industry whereas the less the close substitute product can make the industry less competitive and

According to Michael E. Porter, 2008, a specific industry may change the configuration of the five forces. This essay will focus on the original model of 'The Five Forces That Shape Industry Competition ' (Fig.1) to which Porter views that profit potential is determined by the collective strength of these five forces (Porter, 1980). You can see in relation to Apple and Samsung that the rivalry among existing competitors is high in comparison to the threat of new entrants. However, as much as the two companies compete against each other, they still can at times collaborate - one aspect where this

Nevertheless, the five forces are the framework which forms the back –bone of the industry – based.

To understand and analyze an industry’s structure Michael Porter developed a model portraying every industry to be influenced by five different forces (Jobber 2004). According to Porter, these five forces are the threat of entry, the power of buyers, the power of suppliers, the threat of substitutes, and the competitive rivalry.

The threats of substitute are also very important for the organisations to consider to retail business leading position in the competitive market. If there are many substitute products and services for the customers, they can buy those substitutes for usage that negatively impact on the business performance (Langlois and Richards, 2011). Furthermore, the products and services should be offered with the quality that will exceed the quality and performance of the substitute products (Kotler, & Armstrong, 2006). As a result, the organizations will be able to sell their products and services in a large scale. In case of Indian market for the McDonalds, the local people have many substitute foods to eat during