Reading reaction
Week one
Carmen D. Rosa
Chapter One: In this chapter talks about the history of many decades where the different therapist is treating family members separated from the family and eventually when one member of the family sought help and got better another one seems to be affected. These different observations lead to begging the family therapy movement (Nichols, M. 2017).
Information which was new for me, I have to say the complete chapter as several psychologists tried in a different perspective to provide family therapy and that was the beginning of group sessions.
Information which I must retain as a Professional Counselor to assist me in providing quality counseling interventions to individuals, couples, or families. I believe that all information needs to be kept. However, the methods used to view the family as a whole can help me grow as a professional and future therapist.
Chapter 2: the therapist could obtain a family history, during the first session there were some points to consider for the therapist. First, it is important to make contact with each member of the family. This chapter also talks about the early phase of treatment where confrontational style is one of the technique to
…show more content…
The overview explained the motivation from writing this book, provided a list of work to do. The introduction talks more deeply about the importance of being a Pathfinder parent to give the children the opportunity of growing making their decision and having a healthy self-esteem, including to understand the importance of letting them grow. This chapter also present us with a series of questions to help us identify how much work we had put in our families; have instructions for writing journals, system recovery, and more. This book contains 50 principles and a questioner at the end of this chapter to help guide parents and therapist to work with families (Messina, JJ.
Gladding, S. T. (2010). Family therapy: History, theory, and practice (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson.
In this paper I will be describing how the first two session of the Brice family went. I will talk about what systems approach to therapy was used, and will include how Whitaker and Napier conceptualized the family’s difficulties. I will also describe how this differs from an individual understanding, and will talk about what specific interventions they used to support their systemic understanding of this family.
Family therapy is a technique that has many alternative approaches to every aspect of treatment which Nichols (2014), states may present a challenge when describing a basic technique. The two models of family therapy in which I feel that I would be most effective and comfortable with would be, experiential family therapy and solution-focused brief therapy. I feel most comfortable with these models because, I adapt to the role of the therapist of both therapies naturally. According to Nichols (2014), when families seek therapy they are stuck in a life-cycle transition, sometimes they are obvious and sometimes they are not obvious. I’ve found that during the first session an excellent question is to ask the client why now so that they can
Provided systemic family therapy to individuals, families and couples in an outpatient clinic with various mental health
Family systems therapy is based on the concept that individuals are best understood through evaluating the entire family. Symptoms in individuals are seen as a result in dysfunctions in their family system. The family is an interactional unit and a change in one member affects all members. Family therapists believe that an individual’s relations with family have more impact in their lives than anyone could. The family therapist uses the systemic perspective, it believes that individuals may carry a symptom from the entire family, and an individual’s functioning is an outward sign of the way a family functions.
First, family systems therapy was theorized by Murray Bowen, that an individual can change his own intellectual mind functioning from an emotional state of mind. “Second, the family therapy system primary focus is to change the dysfunctional breakdown, by using the therapeutic approach intended to identify and explain why and how things happen within the family” (Family systems, 2011). Next, the family systems therapeutic approach is designed to figure out how to bring families together, by detailing their interactions and the role each family member plays. By the same token, the goal is to help change the family structure by helping them understand what contributed to their breakdown and the change in the relationship. Not to mention, each
Family therapists should have training in highly efficient methods that they can use to meet the needs of families. These methods should help bring an awareness of how the family processes operate and the therapist should make these apparent to the family. Therapists should also be concerned with helping families re-examine their belief systems and not try to change family structure. A new epistemology, challenging the early cybernetic notions, gained attention (Goldenberg, 2017). For example, the familial unit could influence the individual in many ways and influence the formation of their personality and behaviors. Family therapists should be concerned with epistemology within a family structure. Epistemology explains how one knows what he/she
Journal 1540-4080 0897-5353 WJFP of Family Psychotherapy, Vol. 20, No. 1, January 2009: pp. 1–25 Psychotherapy
Family therapy is essential to working with clients because it helps social workers connect the patterns within each family. According to Nichols, “family therapy considers how problems may be a product of the relationships surrounding them” (p. 50). It can help health professionals understand why there is problematic behavior in family members through the context of the family dynamics and relationships. Family therapy is how we aid our clients in understanding these relationships, and how we help them solve and work through the family problems. This paper will discuss, assess, and provide treatment goals for the Taylor family using the Structural Family Therapy perspective.
Family therapists aim to change systems within which individuals reside(Dykeman, 2011). As a therapist, the responsibility is on me
As described in An Introduction to Family Therapy1 “Systemic and family therapy, like other therapies, has changed and developed to acknowledge
The major techniques that the therapist used were being present with the family and trying to really understand what each member of the family has been experiencing in order for the therapist to have a better ideal on how to guide family toward resolving embedded issues that has disrupted family functioning a healthy manner.
In human service professions, there is a growing incline towards family therapy approaches. The human service “organization” is an ever changing, ever evolving system. From political, demographic, technological and economical perspectives, the field is in a constant state of change. Aspects that once had finite ways of doing things are now faced with having to “re-vamp” the system. Family therapy’s use in human services is one area that has seen consistent growth throughout all of these changes, it’s value being seen for many reasons. Families, as a whole, are prone to being systems within themselves: every member has a role that he or she plays, every member has core beliefs (that are likely influenced by their other family members), and every member has a perception on what goes on around them. By having the
Chapter 13 in Mastering Competencies in Family Therapy by Gehart was about case conceptualization. This is an important chapter because as growing clinicians we are going to have to conceptualize and present cases. This chapter addresses ways of gathering background information about the family structure, and the boundaries of the families; such as, understanding closeness and distance, triangles in the family, and their hierarchy. This chapter reminds clinicians how we must be culturally competent, because some communication stances, patterns, and the hierarchy structure in the family can be culturally normal to our client. The chapter helps the clinician identify these patterns,
The experiential theory for family therapy was developed by Virginia Satir (Satir, et al, 1991) and Carl Whitaker (Whitaker and Bumberry, 1988) and can be loosely