Notable Supreme Court Cases

Dred Scott vs. Sanford – Dred Scott, a slave from Missouri, owned by an army surgeon who had taken Scott into Illinois and Wisconsin where slavery was forbidden. Now, the surgeon’s brother was claiming ownership of Scott. The court was extremely divided but eventually declared that Scott didn’t have a case because he wasn’t a legal citizen.

The Marshall Court is regarded as the most important court within the history of the United States. The decision made in several cases changed tribal sovereignty in an unprecedented way. The first of which in 1823, in Johnson vs McIntosh when it was ruled the private individuals could not purchase land from the natives. At the time the decision was in the United States favor as homestead rights were granted soon after the case, but it shaped the rights of natives in future years. The second case in 1831, Cherokee Nation vs Georgia gave the Indian tribes independence and served as a guidance for the federal government to govern natives. The most important decision was made in 1832 in the case of Worcester vs Georgia where

To conclude, the Marbury v. Madison case has greatly impacted the way the Supreme Court makes decisions. Marbury v. Madison had incorporated the process of Judicial review, which allows courts to review the laws to see if they are being violated. Judicial review was utilized in countless cases, such as, Cohens v. Virginia, Ladue v. Gilleo, and McCulloch v. Maryland. To this day, the Supreme Court has utilized the Marbury v. Madison decision as a model for future

Morgan v. Virginia in 1946 challenged segregation on interstate bus services. The NAACP wanted african americans to be allowed to ride the bus with whites too. They were already allowed to ride

A lot of court cases are historically important and sometimes they the result in changing certain laws. For example, the Brown v. Board of Ed court case ended racial segregation in the U.S., and the Gideon v. Wainwright case required the state to provide low-income defendants with an attorney if they could not afford one. These two cases changed the Federal Constitution against racism and made it possible for all citizens to have the same rights in Untied State, and everyone experiences these changes on a daily basis. Another court case made a change in the Federal Constitution is Tinker v. Des Moines. Tinker v. Des Moines court case took a big part during the Vietnam War because it brought even more attention to the

It is believed that the beginning of a task is often the most important as well as the most difficult, because it consists of discovering the basis to success with a greater chance of failure. The establishment of America after gaining independence from Great Britain relied heavily on the foundations set during the antebellum period, which is often classified as the period of time before the civil war. During such vital time in American history came a number of fundamental Supreme Court cases. The outcome of various cases significantly shaped the future of America into the country we know today. Perhaps some of the most important cases include Marbury v. Madison, Gibbons v. Ogden, and Dred Scott v. Sandford. McCulloch v. Maryland is possibly the most prominent Supreme Court case throughout the antebellum period that occurred in 1819, even though different interpretations of the Necessary and Proper Clause have led to many controversies regarding its meaning and the potential supreme authority of congress, this landmark case established that the federal government has certain implied powers under the constitution.

The decision really helped decide the border between the constitutionally executive and judicial branches of the American government. The case had resulted into a petition to the Supreme Court by William Marbury. Marbury also petitioned the Supreme Court to strengthen the new Secretary of State in order to deliver the documents. The Court had found that Madison's refusal to deliver the agency was both illegal and fixable. The petition later on in the year was refused.

Marbury Vs. Madison is one of the most important cases in the history of the Supreme Court. It was the first case in the US Supreme Court to include the principle of judicial review. In 1803, this case was written by Chief Justice John Marshall. The newly organized part of the Democratic-Republican party ran by Thomas Jefferson defeated the Federalist party ran by John Adams. After this defeat, the Federalists panicked and had to think fast. Adams interviewed a number of justices of peace for the D.C whose commissions were approved by the Senate, signed by the president, and affixed with the official seal of government in the last days of Adams’ presidency.

Marbury vs Madison was a pretty interesting and complicated court case. This case established Judicial review. Judicial review is the power of federal courts to ignore acts of congress in because it's not with the constitution. The decision helped make the supreme court a separate branch of government on the same level with congress and the executive.

The court case of Marbury vs Madison was a very interesting case. It brought attention to the powers of the Supreme Court, and its limitations. The case provided answers to multiple questions such as: Did Mr. Marbury had a right to the Commission? , Did the Law of the United States provided Marbury with an alternative solution to his problem? , Does the Judicial branch have the power to review and make changes to the actions of the Legislative branch? , and is it possible for the Legislative branch to expand the jurisdictions of the Supreme Court beyond the prescribed scope of power in Article three of the Constitution (Lawnix.com).

The Marbury v. Madison case was one of the most important cases ever to come about in the Supreme Court. The case created the doctrine of judicial review, which is basically what makes up the separation of powers. This doctrine enables the legislative and executive branches actions to be reviewed and ruled invalid if the action is unconstitutional. Marbury vs. Madison case ruled the actions of the legislation unconstitutional at the time. Supreme Court Justice John Marshall led the case at hand, and he argued that acts of congress in conflict with the constitution are not law and therefore are non-binding to the courts. In my opinion his arguments are convincing, because he gave important examples as to how the constitution was being

This case was a case for the ages that challenged the very decision of our newly elected president. The former President Adam after a grueling election has lost and in order to maintain the legacy of the Federalist, he began to appoint justices to the Supreme Court. These judges were appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate, but unfortunately for these justices, the letters that confirmed the appointment never reached the potential justices. Adams was working quickly to push the appointments through, but unfortunately he ran out of time and Jefferson took office. Jefferson saw the appointment letters on his desk and discarded them. One of the potential justices was William Marbury and he sued the president for his Supreme Court appointment. His goal was to have the court to order a writ of mandamus, which if completed, would order a government official to fulfil their official duties.

-This court case took over commercial activity. The judicial branch had enough power to overturn any state laws that what to do with commerce. They controlled goods coming in and going out.

The court decision was that marbury sued james madison asking the supreme court to issue a writ requiring him to deliver the document that were necessary. To make marbury justice of the peace. It was decide on the establishment of the judicial review. I think the other reason behind marbury winning is that marbury planned this and he knew what was gonna happen.

     One of the final cause of the Civil was involved a slave named Dred Scott. Dred Scott was an enslaved person owned by John Emerson. Emerson took Dred Scott from Missouri to Illinois, a free state. They then moved back to Missouri, which was a slave state under the Missouri Compromise. In 1857 Dred Scott sued the state of Missouri on the claim that by living in a free state, he was free and had earned his freedom. Scott won that case, but the ruling was later overturn by the Missouri Supreme Court. The Missouri Supreme Court ruled that the compromises including the Missouri Compromise were unconstitutional and that African Americans were not United State citizens and could not be a citizen. Slaves were considered property and had no rights.