preview

Oedipus Rex Fate Vs Free Will

Better Essays

Is it possible to outplay the hand of fate? Fate is prominent in many Greek tragedies, often laying down the path for the protagonist, who fails to stray from fates clutches. The ancient Greeks largely believed that fate was determined at birth, and couldn’t be altered or prevented. Often times in Greek tragedies the hand of fate is responsible for the downfall of great heroes. These tragic heroes bring about their doom through their tragic flaws, with the notion that fate’s hands cannot touch them. In Sophocles' tragedy, “Oedipus Rex,” Oedipus was a tragic hero, whose own hubris and lack of sight brought about his inadvertent and impulsive wrong doings and ultimately his ironic downfall, becoming what he had tried his hardest not to be, proving …show more content…

But like the prideful individual he was, Oedipus was determined to know who the “real” perpetrator was. Teiresias is utterly disheartened and tempered that his king has rejected his readings, claiming that he is lying, or even plotting against him. He truly believed Teiresias was a false prophet, refusing to accept the fact that he could ever have committed such a horrendous act. Teiresias, unable to convince the king, depicts that Oedipus may have eyes, but he did not see. Oedipus, however, feels as if he sees even more than the prophet; that he can see through the oracle. Ironically, Sophocles had Oedipus gouge his own eyes out, a reference to the fact that the king was figuratively blind. Irony is a tragedies best friend, often accompanying each other. The tragedy “Oedipus Rex,” is laced with ironic situations and outcomes. From Jocasta trying to convince Oedipus the prophecy wasn’t true (while she was inadvertently helping him perpetrate it), to Oedipus blinding himself after “seeing” the truth, to the blind seer being able to “see” the most, etc. The most ironic situation in this play however, is the entirety of the play itself; Oedipus believed he was doing the right thing throughout the whole play, while in-actuality, he was doing the very thing he attempted not to …show more content…

But if Oedipus hadn’t been filled with such hubris, or been oblivious to his surrounding happenings, would he still have committed those horrendous acts? Sophocles made Oedipus bring about his own destruction; another reason Aristotle claims him to be such an amazing tragic hero. That is why the story, no matter how utterly disgusted the audience might be by his actions, still manages to tug on the strings of the audiences’ hearts. There was nothing Oedipus could do to avoid fulfilling the prophecy, he had only the best intentions for his people; he was tremendously determined to find the perpetrator of the crime and bring him to justice, saving the city of Thebes from plague. The pride comes in when Oedipus blasphemously claims the prophecy to be untrue or not pertaining to him despite all warning, and the audience is aware that Oedipus cannot see how true it is. When the truth is finally brought to Oedipus’ eyes, is when it all comes crashing down. Oedipus is finally forced to accept this tragic truth, and has a complete breakdown. Jocasta, disgusted and horrified, could not bear the shame of what she had learned, and hanged herself. Shameful, in shock, and filled with disgust, Oedipus could no longer bear his own sight, and blinded himself in attempt to keep from seeing the truth. Ironically, when Oedipus finally and truly sees for the first time, is when he loses his

Get Access