Paying College Athletes

College sports are a phenomenon that keeps viewers coming back for more. Stated in an article on Money Nation the NCAA makes an estimated $1 billion per year and this number is still growing. What really is insane is that all that money is made off of college athletes, who don’t get a penny from that total number. The debate on whether or not college athletes should be paid has been around for decades and probably will still be here for years to come. Paying college athletes would make the teams unfair, change how hard players will work to get better, affect the amateurism of college sports, and lastly influence the athlete's willingness to participate in college sports.

College sports also known as the greatest source of entertainment known to man this era. There are several types of sports ranging from non- physical to the most physical contact sports. Each sport takes sacrifice and dedication to be able to perform at your best knows matter what level. The NCAA is a million dollar business that lets student athletes show their athletic ability and skill toward other individuals. That is the main reason for the creation of collegiate sports, but not to downside the meaning of entertainment. Controversy of paying these athletes is a big deal at the moment. There have been many scandals of athletes receiving direct pay under the table that is not included in their financial aid or scholarship. Paying the

With college basketball and football originating in the 1800’s, the game has had much time to adapt. Over the years, the sports have become more and more popular, gaining a bigger fan base, which has resulted in substantial profits from the sale of merchandise representing the teams and players. There is one thing that has not changed; all of the athletes are still not being paid. The National Collegiate Athletic Association, or NCAA, is an organization that regulates most aspects of

College athletics is a billion dollar industry and has been for a long time. Due to the increasing ratings of college athletics, this figure will continue to rise. It’s simple: bigger, faster, stronger athletes will generate more money. College Universities generate so much revenue during the year that it is only fair to the players that they get a cut. College athletes should get paid based on the university’s revenue, apparel sales, and lack of spending money.

When it comes to college athletics, there always will be a problem that arises. It is one of the most controversial topics there is. One of the main issues within athletics is the idea of whether to pay college athletes or not. Several studies have been done along with articles from various sources. This has been on the rise especially since “March Madness” is coming up. “March Madness” may only consist of three weekends, however, an 11 billion dollar deal is made to televise the games (Wilbon). This is when you have to take the time to sit back and contemplate whether these college athletes really are getting the fair end of the stick. Under NCAA laws it is forbidden to pay these athletes for their performance yet at the same time they

College sports are one of the largest and fastest growing markets in today’s culture. With some college sports games attracting more viewers than their professional counterparts, the NCAA is one of the most profiting organizations in America. Recently there has been controversy in the world of college sports as to whether the college athletes that are making their universities and the NCAA money should receive payment while they are playing their respective sport. Many believe that these athletes should be paid. Others argue that they are already receiving numerous benefits for playing that sport from their universities. Many of the proponents of paying college athletes are current or former college athletes who believe their hard work and hours put into practice and competing go under appreciated. They feel that while the athletes are making the university money, the athletes do not receive any cut of these profits. Opponents feel that athletes already receive numerous perks and should not receive extra compensation on top of the perks they already receive.

Imagine you’ve just graduated a four school and you have crazy debt and you are paying medical bills because you got hurt playing a sport. Which brings the question should College athletes be paid the right the athletes deserve? I believe the athletes should be paid.

College athletes bring in a lot of money to their schools and to the NCAA. Do to college athletes bring in a lot of money and not getting a dime of it, brings up the idea of whether or not college athletes should be paid. Many coaches are debating the topic of paying college athletes. Paying college athletes is a highly debatable topic.

The NCAA is a multi-billion dollar industry that generated over $845 billion last year due to their players’ ability to entertain and perform to their fullest extent at all times. So with all of this money flowing in, why wouldn’t they provide their athletes a stipend? Well that’s a question that today baffles many. What they basically have in place is a corporation that makes tons of money and, oh yeah, they don’t have to pay their employees. Sounds like the perfect business model right? What has continued to be one of the most pressing issues in the world of sports today has now become a matter the NCAA can no longer afford to ignore. The service that college athletes provide to the institutions they attend in addition to millions of spectators all over the world is still not being rewarded in the manner that it should be for their above-average dedication, work ethic, and most importantly money brought in to their employer.

Imagine putting in hours of work and putting yourself at risk of injury at your job and not getting paid for it. That is what college athletes are dealing with. I and many other basketball/football fans think It is unfair that college athletes are not getting paid, just like how there are many people who think they should not get paid to compete even though they put in many hours and hard work to entertain us. Some people think it would not be fair, that they would not be smart with their money, and that it would kill the players will to work hard and compete at their fullest, which I decided to look into to see if these were true.

In my opinion, “The Problems with Paying College Athletes” makes several great points. The central argument of the essay was questioning where the money to pay college athletes would come from. Apparently only fourteen colleges turn a profit from NCAA without relying on institutional support, like student fees. The fourteen colleges that do turn a profit can afford to pay student athletes, but a majority cannot. For the colleges that cannot find the funds to pay athletes, how do they compete against the colleges who can?

College athletics; two words that make most people in the United States of America go crazy, two words that make kids dreams reality, two words that make millions of dollars every year. These words can cause people to love and hate each other. Countless numbers of people and hours of time go into college sports. The top of the collegiate sport food chain is football. Every Saturday 40,000-105,000 people wake up and start their day off early at the stadium, eager to watch their favorite team play four quarters of a game that the country has fallen in love with. A division one football game, like Oklahoma University, brings in a tremendous amount of money every Saturday and year after year brings a big profit back to the university. Where does all of this money go? Who should it go to? Should it go to the players that all the fans come to watch play?

Do you often go to college football or basketball games? In his article “NCAA Schools Can Absolutely Afford To Pay College Athletes, Economists Say” Strachan believes that colleges should pay their athletes because they deserve to be paid. Strachan believes this because as economists say most if not all institutions can afford it, “But when it comes to whether the NCAA…. can afford it, the answer appears to be… yes”(par 27). According to Strachan, “They’re nonprofits, and their incentive is to spend every cent that comes in”(par 9), if they have extra money they should just give it to the players, for bringing the college even more publicity and money. In Strachan’s view, it “shouldn’t be surprising”(par 27) that we have enough money to pay

Over the recent decades, school games have picked up tremendous popularity over the United States. Whether it be football, ball, or hockey, since the time that the turn of the century, intercollegiate games have accumulated a surplus of income to their individual Colleges, and also expanding the notoriety of the School 's notoriety. For instance, in a study directed by the Orland Sentiental, it was evaluated that the College of Texas ' Sports System had the most astounding income of some other College at $120,288,370 (Robbins, Josh). Yet with this expansive whole of cash, no school competitors are lawfully made up for their work. As indicated by NCAA standards, "You are not qualified for support in a game on the off chance that you have ever. Taken pay, or the guarantee of pay, for contending in that game" (NCAA Regulations 1). Because of this law, not just are school competitors experiencing issues in paying off their school educational cost, additionally numerous players are generally paid under the table through underground markets. These novice competitors have no impetus to stay in school and completion their individual degrees, as numerous can 't bear to pay for the undeniably costly school experience. While numerous contend that school competitors shouldn 't be paid as they are simply novices speaking to their schools, I contend that players must be paid to spare the authenticity

The NCAA’s greatest fear about paying student athletes is the money itself. They worry it will be spread thin between all the sports departments, but with all the money circulating around the college sports industry, they should not have any concerns. The two most popular college sports, football and men’s basketball, generate over $6 billion in annual revenue combined; more than the amount the National