Nearly 500,000 people have died in Syria due to the horrendous civil war occuring in the country. Something really needs to be done to help the innocent citizens of Syria survive and to start a new, war-free lifestyle. In my opinion, the United States should choose to continue to aid the citizens of Syria, and also try to stop the issue by using a combination of Option 1: Use the U.S. Military in Syria, and Option 2: Stop the Humanitarian Disaster. Together this plan would help the citizens of Syria, use force to stop the government, and use diplomacy to stop the government’s harm on Syria.
Continuing to aid the citizens of Syria would help the disaster. In refugee camps, Syrians don’t have access to enough clean water, food, jobs, and other
…show more content…
Military in Syria would contribute to stopping the government from continuing to tear up Syria. As a country, we have already used our military to help end the harm the government has already done. Sometimes, using the force of military can do more than using words or diplomacy. However, using the military can sometimes cause more harm than intended, so we need to be very mindful of the effects of our military.
Option 2: Stop the Humanitarian Disaster is also a good option when we are trying to stop this catastrophe. To peacefully end the civil war in Syria would be the ultimate goal. Without causing any more harm to the already torn up country, we could peacefully end the fighting. Diplomacy is not always easy to reach, however. Because there are so many different groups and opinions, we could propose an idea of ending the war, but it could easily get turned away by the opposing ideas.
It appears to me that a combination of continuing to aid the Syrian refugees, Option 1: Use the U.S. Military in Syria, and Option 2: Stop the Humanitarian Disaster would work very well in ending the war with the government in Syria. In my plan, the refugees would be helped, and the government would be strongly encouraged to comply with the political agreement and military force would be applied if they continue to mangle their country. The U.S. should choose the best policy they can to stop the disaster. I feel as though the plan I have put together connects with most
As of October 2016, the number of people in or outside of the country of Syria who are in need of assistance is about 22 million. (“Quick Facts”) 30 liters of water per day is what is what some places with many Syrian refugees have to work with; the typical American uses ten times that amount. (“Quick Facts”) In the fiscal year of 2016, America went over the set goal by President Barack Obama; of the Syrians that needed help 12,500 were given sanctuary.(Morello) This success proves that America is willing to work and that the Syrian refugees that are in need can be sanctioned effectively and given
The war in Syria has displaced millions of people. The refugees that can have fled to Europe, America, and most of all their neighboring countries. The United States is trying to do its part, but the refugee policy isn't helping it do enough. The U.S. refugee policy needs to be changed. The country needs to help refugees within our borders, as well as help countries taking in the majority of refugees. The U.S. can also improve the current refugee vetting process, which would greatly increase it's efficiency.
The United States should continue take in Syrian refugees at a high rate because it is a humanitarian gesture for the people uprooted by war and crisis. The United States has been accepting refugees systematically since 1980, when the Refugee Act passed. The goal of the Refugee Act was to create a uniform procedure with which to provide these opportunities to refugees. Since early 2011, Syria’s civilians have been suffering from the effects of their country’s Civil War. The United States provides a safe haven for babies, kids, teens, and adults who are impacted by the war tragedy.
The United States is nearly $18.5 trillion in debt and can hardly support its own citizens, let alone a new influx of Syrian refugees. This year, it cost the U.S. $1.1 billion to bring 70,000 refugees to our country, which is roughly $15,714 per person (Somanader). Those who claim that the U.S. is behind in their efforts to assist Syrians during this crisis are very wrong; the U.S. government has been, and is currently, leading the world in response to the issue at hand, providing $4.5 billion towards healthcare and basic necessities for those suffering in Syria and its neighboring countries. We are already “the world’s largest bilateral donor of humanitarian aid” and simply cannot afford to use our resources to both
The United States has a history of offering help when it comes to other country's domestic issues. As of right now, there is a civil war going on in Syria due to issues concerning how their government should be run. According to the ideological perspectives of Woodrow Wilson, which many of our recent presidents, such as Bill Clinton, George Bush, and Barack Obama, seemed to follow is the advancement in spreading democracy and capitalism to impoverished countries. Because of the moral and ethical issues concerning the situation in Syria, it is very difficult to make a decision when it involves the lives of many people. However, if one were to incorporate the actions this country has made in the past, such as with what went on in Vietnam, it would definitely be for the best if the U.S. did not take part in the Syrian conflict.
It has been four years and is a lone crisis’ that is most sought to be assisted. Firstly, in order to contribute, there must be awareness and realization of the fact that this issue is not solely affecting Syria and Syrians. People need to care and talk about it. They have to know that this crisis is not independent. Secondly, people need to contribute and support Syrian Refugees: whether a generous donation or a small donation from many, it will impact the lives of several families. These small actions can lead to bringing clean water and food to people, improving shelters, giving families some basic household needs and attempting to provide coping methods for some of the terrors that young children and adults have been faced with. Both knowledge and provision can create global response. This will bring resources to refugees who need it to survive and aid when executing the reconstruction of
The war in Syria has resulted in hundreds of thousands of casualties, as well as the displacement, of just as many refugees who have fled the country. The regime of Bashar Al-Assad, reportedly deployed chemical agents against innocent Syrian people. President Obama went on record, saying that Assad should not cross the “thin red line” (Filkins, 2013). Many interpret this statement from the president to be a threat of war against Syria. Some are actually arguing the ethics of war in this case. During a panel discussion between theologians and policy makers on what makes for a “Just war”, Stanley Hauerwas, Professor emeritus of theological ethics at Duke Divinity School explained that the idea of a “Just war” consists of a discourse which requires thorough diplomatic argument that exhausts all nonviolent efforts before military intervention can ever be considered (Shimron, 2013).
“The New American Foundation's Brian Fishman recommends a patient approach of training and modestly arming rebels,” said an online article for the Council of Foreign Relations. Others suggest that the U.S. should reach out for the non-extremists in Syria and work with them to most importantly secure the collapse of Assad’s regime. The U.S. helped over the
However, we have a limit as to accepting refugees. Our economy and national security cannot afford the costs of these refugees. In my opinion, the ultimate goal for helping Syrian refugees is to take back the lost territory and restore their country. With the current war lasting more than 5 years and not showing any signs of terminating, Syria needs more international military support than ever. Regarded as the world’s policeman, the US have the responsibility to help suppress it and contain the spread of terrorism in the
As previously read, Syria has turned into a mess, all because one person, the president, decided not to hear the people and abuse his power to do what he wants. This needs to be stopped as soon as possible not only is it violating the human rights declaration but it's also simply inhumanitarian, killing babies and blindly killing civilians, what a misery syria has become.
The Syrian War has gone on for far too long and should come to an end because of the casualties. Over 400,000 people have died from the Syrian war. According to CNN, about 400,000 lives have been claimed in the war since it’s start in 2011.
It’s the middle of the night, and the moon is shining at full force, casting a soft glow upon the battle ground that lies beneath. The eerie calm of the midnight air is pierced with the rattle of a machine gun off in the distance. Minutes later, an MIG cannon rumbles the earth, sending a shaking building to tumble to its death. Screams can be heard amidst the chaos. No, this isn’t the setting of a bad dream, or even the plot of a scene depicting the throws of war. Terror, violence, and bloodshed, mark the reality of the civil war in Syria, which some claim is the biggest humanitarian crisis since World War II. It seems like everyone has an opinion regarding what strides should be taken to resolve the issue, but no one answer can solve the problem at hand. The conflict in Syria has spiraled completely out of control, and even the most prominent policy makers in America grapple with the issue of how to put an end to the violence.
An understanding of where the Syrian healthcare system stood before the civil war, the toll of the fighting and intentional targeting of medical personnel/infrastructure, ongoing humanitarian efforts, and America’s actions to date enable an informed evaluation of whether or not to use American military forces in a humanitarian assistance role in Syria. This context allows for an examination of the limitations of humanitarian aid, the advantages/disadvantages of plausible courses of action involving the military and the threat of mission creep. Before evaluating the merits of available courses of action the military can take to address Syria’s medical crisis, it is important to identify and understand the limitations of humanitarian assistance in general. Taylor Seybolt, Associate Professor in International Affairs at the University of Pittsburgh an expert on military and humanitarian intervention, cites the following inherent limitations of humanitarian intervention: it does not provide a lasting solution to conflict; it has the potential to prolong wars; it can foster economic dependence; and it inhibits strong state development.19 When these limitations are considered in regard to Syria, military intervention for the sole purpose of providing medical humanitarian support does not make sense.
Inaction is more dangerous and can cause a “potentially riskier and costlier -- than smart, limited intervention. Syria may seem far away, but every passing day, every calamitous, explosive, hate-infused day, makes it more America's -- and the world's -- problem” (Ghitis). Everyday more and more people are being displaced out of their homes and land because of war and terrorist acts posed by ISIS and the corrupt governments like Syria. These injustices imposed by these groups spread and will eventually effect of the world in action is not taken now. As seen by (Ghitis) again when he shows ““Millions of Syrians have fled their homes, straining resources and occasionally raining fire into Jordan, Lebanon, Turkey, Iraq and even Israel.” These millions of displaced refugees hurt surrounding countries and have forced them to even put up border lines and gates preventing these refugees from flooding their countries. This inflicts great stress and problems to these countries. Countries like Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, and Iraq, because they are now having to increase security spending and take care of millions of homeless people who are starving and dying of injuries or disease that they just do not have the supplies to help. At this point, this is where the US needs to be brought in, if not sooner. The US has the capabilities to prevent all of these problems, but
The Syrian refugee crisis has received massive media coverage. People around the world are trying to comprehend the desperate, complicated situation surrounding Syria. The civil war in Syria is the worst crisis in our time. Syrians upset at the fact that long promised reforms have not been enacted, began anti-government demonstrations which started the civil war in 2011. The peaceful protests turned ugly, with the government violently putting an end to those protests. Afterward, ordinary citizens took arms, causing the situation to escalate. Syrians are fleeing their homes because of the great violence, which have left thousands dead and millions wounded, a collapsed infrastructure, resulting in a shattered economy, and for the safety of the children. Syrians are either streaming to surrounding countries or risking their lives to travel to Europe.