Positive Behavior Support Scenarios

There are many strategies when dealing with student behavior. However, they’re usually limited to the classroom setting and offices. When it comes to school wide management, Positive Behavior Interventions and Support or PBIS

Verney Road State School has effectively established the SWPBS and continues to develop and improve strategies in place to ensure a school wide culture that promotes positive behavior. The PBS Implemenation Team at Verney Road State School is responsible for the implementation and monitoring of school wide behavior. As a school wide approach, it is essential that students have a clear and consistent understanding of school wide expectations. Teachers throughout the school should receive guidelines and action plans on how to facilitate these expectations. The school would be responsible for ensuring all staff are supported and have the resources and professional development to effectively implement the PBS practices in a classroom and across the school

An alternative to expulsion and suspension can be the implementation of School-wide Positive Behavior Support (SWPBS) framework (Nocera, Whitbread and Nocera, 2014). It was implemented in a low-performing middle school and it incorporated evidence-based education strategies, improved school climate, reinforced positive student behavior, and improved overall academic achievement (Nocera, Whitbread and Nocera, 2014). In order to change the climate of a school, it must encompass the support of the district, administrators, staff and students. One important facet of the school nurse is case management of conditions and orchestrating care with the school community. This can enable the identification of students with depression, anxiety, behaviors of self-harm and providing them and their families with proper referrals and educating staff on such conditions. Therefore, subsiding harsh punishments and spearheading crisis management of possible destructive behaviors.

These results indicate that in North Carolina negative behaviors in the future are preventable. The instructing officers stated that it improved their relationships with the children, the school, and the community as a whole, which shows that the program is working (National Institution of Justice).

The purpose of this paper is to research the use of the School-Wide Positive Behavior Support system while teaching students with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). I am interested in learning the SWPBS model and if it is beneficial to use with ASD students. I would like to identify evidence-based practices for supporting students with Autism Spectrum Disorder and the best ways to implement them within the school system.

In this tier, approximately 15 to 20% of students are being serviced by receiving more intensive behavior interventions. These more intensive behavior interventions include supports that only students not responding to tier one will receive. These supports include small group or individualized interventions strategies that are easily administered by teachers and faculty. An example of such instruction would be a group that reenacts social situations to learn appropriate behaviors to replace inappropriate behaviors. In addition, behavior education plan may be implemented during this stage for some students. Several types of data are collected to ascertain whether interventions in this tier are working. These include office discipline referrals, classroom incidents, observations, out-of-school suspensions and in-school suspensions, faculty/teacher surveys, fidelity evaluations and through progress monitoring. If data collected reveals that a student is not adequately responding to interventions in this tier then other interventions may need to be tried or the student moved to the third tier. If a student does respond adequately, the interventions should be continued and if no longer necessary, the student returned to receiving only tier one

Schoolwide positive behavioral interventions and supports is a systems approach to effectively managing student behavior. The review of literature will discuss the critical elements to a systems approach for schoolwide behavior management and the proposed implementation. I will also focus on describing the barrier and enablers for successful implementation of PBIS. Finally, I will discuss the literature on sustainability of PBIS.

Using the results of the Scale of Effective School Discipline and Safety (SEDS) Questionnaire given to Lacy Elementary School participants, an analysis of the readiness of their teachers to implement a Positive Behavioral Support System (PBSS) will be examined. The SEDS questionnaire consists of 58 items, which are organized into five areas of attention by scale: Scale 1: Teachers’ Effective Classroom Management Skills (24 items), Scale 2: Teachers’ Positive Behavioral Interactions and Respect (11 items), Scale 3: Holding Students Accountable for Their Behavior: Administration and Staff (7 items), Scale 4: Teachers’ Contribution to a Positive School Climate (9 items), and Scale 5: School Safety and

We started Positive Behavior Intervention Support (PBIS) Program with a survey to all staff including aides, teachers, and noon-duty supervisors. We identified different locations and times for behaviors seen in those areas. Looked at behaviors tickets and categorized the different reasons for referrals. Then we developed a discipline plan of expected behaviors in each area. Presented the to entire school community. School Site Council (SSC), Parent Teacher Administration (PTA), English Learner Advisory Committee (ELAC). Discussed positive rewards for models showing how they followed rules. We continue to teach

In the past Applied Behavior Analysis and Positive Behavior Supports has been viewed as simultaneous terms where behaviors are a concern; these evidenced based practices are different entities when evaluating behaviors in the classroom. The commonalities among the group of literatures determined that Applied Behavior Analysis and Positive Behavior Support has been the focus in education through the No Child Left Behind Act (2004) by identifying students with at-risk behaviors. For example, both models consider the use of direct observations as the means to formulate interventions, develops the common goal of reducing behaviors through functional assessments, and evaluate behaviors under evaluation through single research designs (). Although, Positive Behavior Support and Applied Behavior Analysis has been evaluated as under the same conditions; there are differences among the literatures that suggest a controversy in the classroom setting. Applied behavior analysis is deemed as observable and measurable as to gain the reasoning behind behavior issues through clinical assess, and uses the formulation of data to determine appropriate intervention to obtain generality and in different situations. This is quite different from the views of Positive Behavior Support as literatures examines the evidence-based practice as in the natural environment, reduction of data-driven approach, and is likely used for the group approach as in a school setting.

I agree with the statement that according to the Center for Evidence-Based Policy, successful interventions involve proactivity, focused strategies, and applicability in the proper places. However, I differ on the fact that proactive measures are preferred over reactive measures to control behaviour. The positive process of bahavior support is a general or all-inclusive method of tackling a problematic behaviour or conduct in that it does not only take into account the behaviour itself, however, it also regards the characteristics or traits and the circumstances of the individual or child that exhibit that particular conduct, as well as the conditions together with people that are around it or that form the environment. Nevertheless, the interventions

Six years ago, my school, San Pasqual Academy, experience an increase of special education students with emotional disturbance and oppositional defiant disorder classifications. In response we begin to implement the Building Effective Schools Together (BEST) program under the guidance of Jeff Sprague of the University of Oregon’s Institute on Violence and Destructive Behavior. I served on this BEST committee and collaborated with my colleagues to create, implement, and monitor a schoolwide behavior plan for our site. We gathered qualitative and quantitative student behavior data to inform and guide our work. After two years of program implementation and data collection, we were finally prepared to begin to focus our work toward accurately targeting students in need of individualized/intensive interventions and followed the research question, “Which of our students are in the most need of behavior support?

The relationship between positive behavior support and safe productive learning environments is positive behavior support is strategies used to help to motivate students. For this reason, the positive behavior support is used to “enhance their skills, achievement, self-determination,” (P,98)

Some of the outcomes from the study involved improved view of school as a caring environment which led to better learning in core subjects. This program lowered overall depression symptoms for the fourth through sixth grade students, but was significant especially for the students in sixth grade that were reported victims of bullying. Lowering depression symptoms also improved self-esteem among the sixth-grade victims as well. Not only were significant improvements seen following the study, but these improvements were seen to have long lasting effects six months after the completion of the program. Results like this suggest that these children will possibly carry what they have learned into future school environments and on to post school or career fields. The only down side I saw to this program is that it has yet to have been replicated using other cultures, but I have hope that the University of Kansas students are in the process of completing this

Teachers of students with or at risk for emotional or behavioral disabilities (EBD) face countless stressful professional challenges throughout their careers. Students with EBD are being scattered amongst General Education classrooms and can often exhibit behavioral changes in which many teachers who have not had proper training or experience in managing may find overwhelming. One strategy to help maintain engagement and reduce behavioral challenges in a classroom that includes students with or at risk for EBD is to increase the rate of Behavior-Specific Praise (BSP). Offering students praise in the form of a statement which explains which acceptable behavior they are being praised for can enhance the student’s ability to remain on task and engaged in classroom activities and discussions.