Pros And Cons Of Increasing Military Spending

The first reason that military spending should be cut down on is that it takes away the focus from other incredibly important areas. One of the many areas that loose focus because of the large amount of military spending is the education sector. Primary education should be one of the main concerns of our government. Not only because it is where we teach our children about the world, but also it gives them the chance for a better future. They do not learn this from the military. The main reason that education is a better investment is because in the long run education helps the economy grow, since it creates a more skillful labor force. The amount of spending that goes into the military takes away from the potential of a long-term benefit to our

With the numbers totaled the defense budget is currently sitting at a solid 3.5 percent of our GDP and there are still questions on how much more we can put in to make this country safe. The White House is calling for more money to be spent on national defense and their economists say that the United States can withstand a gross spending of somewhere around 9 to 10 percent of our GDP. The money to pay for any

Military deployments are hard on everyone involved: family, friends, and even the person enrolled. While the time they are away may be tough, their homecoming is a fantastic time of reunion. Oftentimes, families and friends will throw their military loved one a homecoming reunion party. If you are thinking about doing this, keep these four tips in mind to ensure it is a smashing success:

“The United States spent $598.5 billion dollars alone on the military in 2015. That is 54% of all spending in 2015. The US only spent $70 billion (6%) on education and $13.1 billion (1%) on food and agriculture.” (“Military Spending”). This shows what Americans really value.

In the past America has been a dominant superpower in the field of military strength, but for the last few decades, our military has encountered abounding liquidations and sequestrations, which lead to huge budget cuts. Nevertheless, America has faced many politicians planning to cut down on our military by virtue of it is simply cost effective. The Clinton Foundation has been cutting our military for countless years. Also, under the Obama Administration has been enacting laws comparable to the Budget Control Act or (BCA) which has been siphoning our military for the past 8 years. For countless years, defense officials remain silent due to the Obama Administration, vaguely America could keep its budget under control. Consequently, all four

The military was founded in 1775 in order to fight Great Britain. The small army was led by appointed commander George Washington. Ever since its establishment, the military has continued to increase. The United States currently has about 1.3 million active troops and an additional 865,000 troops in reserve - it is the world’s third largest military. The US also has a large global presence with troops deployed in over 170 countries including South Korea, Italy, Afghanistan, and Japan.

There are not any easy ways to cut spending on the military especially since we are in the middle of fighting in Iraq. We can not just pull some troops or provide them with less weapons or supplies then expect them to protect our country as well as they are now. We need a defense budget that matches the new security challenges, not the threats of the last century. We need to recognize that a strong economy is essential for providing the resources to meet future threats; addressing these long-term debts will keep our economy strong.

I believe that the United States should not spend any more time, money, nor effort on the military than they already have done because they should be spending more time on repairing the amount of national debt they have instead of being the “police of the world.” They are already a step ahead in the game with the advanced military technology, but continue to neglect education and health care for the rest of the country, for examples the veterans who are homeless. They should cut the amount of money and amount of troops out there when they could be here and safe.

While this appears to be a good datapoint in that it is a direct correlation to “butter” related activities. Training is relative to education and compensation is relative to pay and benefits. A number of questions which arise: If 80% of the military budget is relative to “butter” related activities, and 20% is being spent for direct defense related efforts, then why are these costs included in the defense budget? Would shifting the costs for military training be better suited at the Department of Labor (current budget of $11.8 billion)? Would shifting the costs for compensation related healthcare be better situated at the Department of Health and Human Services (current budget s $77.1 billion) and the Department of Veterans Affairs (current budget s $65.3 billion)?

The question is how and where do you apply for funding and cut cost to certain areas. The impact of federal health care shows the federal budget cannot be overstated. The federal budget is shrinking and the governments flexibility is to pay for other obligations such as homeland security, environmental cleanup, and disaster. In addition, the Department of Defense and the Veterans Affairs is increasing.

When a government’s spending exceeds its revenues causing or deepening a deficit it is called deficit spending. Deficit spending is only one of numerous tools used to help manage the economy. Deficit spending is presumed to stimulate consumer demand by helping the consumer to obtain more money to spend, in turn, the demand of product will rise. There are advantages and disadvantages to deficit spending that we will discuss further below.

For example, Trump wants to eradicate the Supporting Effective Educator Development Grant Program that provides funding for quality educators. America’s education system, when compared to the rest of the world, is embarrassingly corrupt. For this reason, Trump should be focusing on rebuilding our education system instead of our military. Yes, military spending stimulates the economy, but in the long run improving our education is more imperative. It’s been proven that a country with an excellent education system will intern have a healthy thriving economy. There are definitely more programs that Trump plans on discarding but honestly he needs to leave them

“Deficit spending is spending that reduces or offsets a surplus. In the business world, the term often refers to situations where expenses exceed revenues, imports exceed exports or liabilities exceed assets” (Deficit spending). Shortfall spending makes monetary shortages and exchange deficiencies. Financial deficiencies happen when an administration's consumptions surpass its income. An administration for the most part acquires cash to fill the crevice or "store the shortage." Trade shortfalls happen when a nation imports more than it sends out. Shortfall spending is dubious. On the other hand, numerous researchers likewise contend that administrations ought not to take part in shortfall spending consistently in light of the fact that the

I believe that increased military spending should be enforced, as it provides many benefits to the country and its people. During warfare, Canada and its people get more protection when the military is stronger, well-trained, and better equipped. More money spent on the military gives Canadians the reassurance of knowing that they live in a safe country. Speaking of safety, it is definitely a pull factor for any immigrant. Canada’s immigration rate will increase, making the country more appealing and multicultural. Also, spending more money on the military puts the nation in a higher economic status. It makes Canada look more stronger and well-equipped amongst other countries.

     Of course, without the supports of the economy it is quite impossible to fund the military, or