preview

Rhetorical Analysis: What It Is Like To Go To War

Decent Essays

In What It Is Like To Go To War, Karl Marlantes writes about a multitude of issues that war veterans have to deal with after coming back from war and uses the rhetorical appeals of ethos logos and pathos to try and build common ground with the audience. The opening pages to “Loyalty” are not written in the viewpoint of Marlantes being in the Vietnam War, providing where and what Marlantes was loyal to and how he viewed loyalty as, this is ineffective method t build common ground with me because I have never experienced any violent scenario let alone war; Marlantes heartache after leaving Meg behind to show how painful it was for both of these young lovers shows a strong use of pathos because everyone can relate to heartache, romantic or not, to the other rhetorical …show more content…

After illustrating his struggles of letting go of his love from college and no asking her how she felt about him going to war he realizes he betrayed her loyalty. Marlantes acknowledges, “Not only did I not consult her …. I didn’t even think about consulting her…Meg’s hurt translated into anger and eventually a Dear John while I was in Vietnam” (138). By being able to recognize the fact that he practically destroyed the love of his life emotionally, Marlantes evokes the audience to think about where Marlantes himself even know the true meaning of being loyal to one person. However, the emotions that Marlantes experience while he is in Vietnam are not relatable to anyone who has not experienced war. It is a known fact that America has not been a part of the war front since the Civil War, therefore Americans who have not fought cannot relate to Marlantes’

Get Access