Shays Rebellion Dbq

These different views on government made many people think hard on what type of government they wanted. In the end, the Federalist’s point of view won. Today, this type of government still exists. It made one of the

Fears of a strong federal government encompass many Americans’ minds because of concern that a monarchy will, once again, control them like it once did under British rule. The Constitution, although a

The federalist had the idea that a strong central government would be necessary for a newly developed nation. In “In republican government, the legislative authority necessarily predominates.”, the federalists are basically saying that the national government has more power over the states government. Federalists also believe in a national bank and to tax

The fact that the anti federalists were afraid of a central government was not very surprising as they had come from a king that ruled over them and used them, but to have a bill of rights making sure they were safe from the government. One of the amendments in the bill of rights was the right to bear arms, which means that the towns had the right to a local militia that had weapons. This proves they're scared because the reason they had the right added was so that the local militia could protect their town if the government goes rogue, or so they could protect themselves from other countries and the indians if the government wouldn't help. Another reason that proves that the anti federalists were scared of a central government is that they had the 3rd amendment, that prevented the quartering of troops. The amendment says that no troops shall be put in people's homes without the consent of the owner, or

“If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary.” (Madison Fed 51). Madison’s Federalist Papers outlined how James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay believed the government should be and needed to be organized and run, or government would be destroyed. Federalist 10 identified the need for two factions, where the ambitions of one faction could be counteracted by the ambition of the second faction. The fear of the tyranny of the king of Britain lay fresh in the minds of the founders, and did not want to be governed by the tyranny of a majority. Two methods were outlined in Federalist 10 to cull this fear. The first option is

After the war, America was a chaotic place. Although there was the Article of Confederation, America’s system of government was incomplete. A lot of problems existed and people were revolting. Of all those revolts, two were significant, the Shay’s Rebellion and the Whiskey Rebellion. The Shay’s Rebellion happened in 1786, when there was an economy crisis and the local courts started to shut down the farms. The Whiskey Rebellion happened in 1791, when the government imposed taxes on the whiskey. Although both of the revolts were crashed down, they changed the government. After the Whiskey and the Shay’s Rebellion, people promoted a stronger federal government, precedent of obeying the law was set and it had shown that the executive would act to execute the law.

Henry’s Speech Was a Call to Action. What Did He Want His Fellow Virginians To Do? What Were His Justifications For The Proposed Action? How Did Henry Address The Concerns Of Those Who Did Not Agree With Him?

After reading an excerpt from Daniel Gray’s verbalization, I accede that Shays “Rebellion” was a fight for liberation. First of all, one of the reasons the people decided to revolt is the money from taxes wasn’t used to pay off the peregrine debt. In document A, the text states, “Instead it is being used to pay off investments that are held by wealthy

A key concern the federalist’s held since the start of the war with parting from England is that citizens of America could ultimately divided against each other if their voice is not heard with the new form of government that

According to the passage, “Patrick Henry Speaks Against Ratification of the Constitution (1788)”, “Patrick Henry, the noted Virginia delegate to the Constitutional Convention, opposed a federal form of government in the United States.” He was a major key during the late 1700’s. He helped to lead many people in the right direction. He believed that the citizens of the country were good, and he also believed that they were happy. After a meeting in Philadelphia, that all came to an end according to Patrick Henry. In the article stated above it says, “Before the meeting of the late federal Convention at Philadelphia, a general peace and a universal tranquillity prevailed in this country; but, since that period, they are exceedingly uneasy and disquieted.” That one meeting turned the entire town in a different direction. The spirit of the community was instilled in the young and old to bring everyone back together.

The early years of the Constitution of the United States were full of political strife. The two prominent political ideals were complete opposites. The Jeffersonian Republicans were focused on giving power to the people and maintaining a pastoral economy, while the Federalists supported the control of the government by the elite class, and maintaining “positive” democracy. Both parties feared the influence and effect the other party would have on the public. In Linda K. Kerber's article, “The Fears of the Federalists”, the major concerns Federalists held in the early 19th century are described. Ever since the war with and separation from England, the citizens of America were seen to be continually drive to “patriotic rebellion” as a way to

He thinks that this system would never really be followed. The senate, he says, is not structured well enough to protect the rights of the people. One of his main points is the leaning towards a monarchy. He describes that it would be very easy for the President to become a king. Henry seems to also contradict himself on this point when he says that he would rather have a king and lords than a chief who controls the army. Henry's final point is about the creation of an absolute ruler. Like he says about the monarchy, it would be easy for this to happen. If the President has control of the army, it would be easy to declare himself an absolute leader.

The late eighteenth century through the early nineteenth century was a time of great change for the United States. The country was still new and much internal strife still occurred as the government went through the process of reshaping and refining how the government operated. These changes were often sparked by resistance from different classes of people and different factions who often rebelled and ran their own way until results were found, such as with the Regulator movement, Shay’s Rebellion, and the Whiskey Rebellion.

As he goes on in his speech, he says that to not be free, would be worse than death. Therefore, according to Patrick Henry’s logical argument, and substitution, they must revolt, or face a condition worse than death.

Federalism was an inevitable and paramount mechanism to creation the of the Union. Therefore, it is acceptable that its governing principles would define and refine a majority of the nation’s history. Shaping the government, laws, and politics of the current and future generations during the creation of the Constitution, federalism permanently altered the life of every American. Federalism and the Constitution were derived from a similar ideal: endurance of free society had to be preserved by a sense of unity that acted as a safeguard against prevalent dangers, advanced the common good while still maintaining responsiveness to the diversity of the nation (Wechsler, 1954). The Constitution established a central government that possessed the capacity to interpret its