Should Electoral College Be Abolished Dbq

One primary shortcoming with the Electoral College is that it is based on population. This means that each state in the Union gets a predetermined quantity of electoral

The Electoral College system was created in the constitution by the Founding Fathers. This system forms the beginning of the United States' national elections and is therefore, considered to be important to this country's history. It is made up of 538 members and a candidate must receive a majority of 270 electoral votes to win the election. Electors usually get selected to one of the presidential candidates running. When people go to the ballot on voting day and pick their favorite candidate, they are really choosing the electors for their state and then the electors are the ones that vote for the president. The Electoral College should be revised or abolished because it is both undemocratic, is not beneficial to the nation, and may weaken the validity of elections and the elected President.

The Electoral College was created 200 years ago and times have definitely changed. People are well educated these days, and have a better understanding of the whole election process. Two centuries ago people didn't have TV, radio, news broadcasting, or the internet. These are all good sources that to supply us with more than enough coverage of the elections at hand. The whole system makes no sense, because depending on how big a state is, depends on how many electors that state has. The smaller the state, the more electors it has. It should be the other way around. Also population density has changed over time.

The problem that has brought the Electoral College to the spotlight in the past few years is the fact that the Electoral College winner does not always reflect the winner of the popular vote. This has already occurred three times in history: Rutherford B. Hays vs. Samuel J. Tilden in 1876, Benjamin Harrison vs. Grover Cleveland in 1888 and most recently, the 2000 election between Gore and Bush (Cornwell). Although half a million more Americans voted for Al Gore than did for George Bush, Bush won the Electoral College 271 to 266, granting him the presidency (Abolish the Electoral College). It doesn't make much sense that the candidate in which received a majority of the votes overall would lose.

Changing and or doing away with it would only lead to other problems. The Electoral College is here to help the people from getting swindled and to give states that would be seen as not important just because of their size a chance to be heard. Even with the disagreements for the Electoral College's choice, disposing of it is not the answer. Learning more about it and remembering it’s reason for being around will help shine the significance. The dissension the elections of 2000 and 2016 have caused could be seen as good, reason being, it drove many to be informed of the college. In the end, it is best to keep the Electoral

America the place where we the people get to pick the president, actually not there are a few indivals that are called the Electoral College and they really pick who the president will be. There are 538 people in the Electoral College and they pick who the next president will be. The 538 people in the Electoral College consist of 100 senators and 438 repressive from the fifty states. The Electoral College should be abolished because it is undemocratic, not accurate for the people votes, and it is unfair to 3rd party candidates.

Larger states, like California and Texas, are a main focus for candidates because of the number of electoral votes that they would earn. Also, a president can be elected, even if he or she does not represent the ideas or opinions of the people. In rare cases, a president can win the popular vote and lose the electoral college vote. “If this is the case, the very large margins secured by the losing candidate in the other states would add up to over 50% of the ballots cast nationally. Therefore, the losing candidate may have gained more than 50% of the ballots cast by voters,” says “Does Your Vote Count? The Electoral College Explained”. If the people vote for a particular candidate, that candidate should be president. Finally, people who disagree with their states are not represented due to the “‘winner take all’” system. A person may vote for the democratic candidate but the republican

Even though the Electoral college worked in the past it isn’t working for the present. The Electoral College was created to help elect a president. How that works is the 50 states are assigned so many voting representatives depending on population in that state. This worked in the past due to most states population was equal but in present times its not so some states have more of a say so in electing the president of The United States. Even though the Electoral College worked in the past, it needs to be change for the present and these reasons are; it gives bigger states more votes and is unfair to smaller states (Clayton)

The Constitution of the United States of America created a system called the Electoral College where it outlines the rules in which we elect the President of the United States of America. As stated in Article 2, Section 1 of the U. S. Constitution created the Electoral College. Each state receives as many electoral votes as it has senators and representatives. Therefore, each state, including the District of Columbia, will have at least three electors. This is the vision of the Constitution. Now the problem arises when all the Electoral votes from one state are given to the popular winner for that state. This causes a with people’s right to chose their leader as votes of the people that voted for the losing candidate are tossed in the trash. All this while giving the state the ultimate power to elect the president.

The issue with the electoral college is the swing states, those are the ones that actually decide which person wins the election. Someone might have the popular vote but out of nowhere Wisconsin has a whole bunch of electoral points and makes the person with the less votes win the election. Which since that can happen, the candidates for

The Electoral College is a process, not a place of schooling. The Electoral College is responsible for electing who will be our next president of the United States by compromising between electing the president by vote and electing the president by popular vote of qualified citizens. The electoral College should be abolished because it is an unfair and unnecessary way to choose the president. Each candidate earns points by winning individual states. Each state is worth a different amount of points based on population, added with the number of senators. There are 538 electors within the college. People are finding it a challenge to decide if the Electoral College should be changed or abolished. If it were up to me, it would be abolished, because if the president wins the popular vote, they get the majority of the citizens votes. This system is unfair because each state has a different number population, so each has a different amount of points. When I am eligible to vote, I want to be able to vote for who I want, the majority of my state’s population should not be able to decide. The Electoral College may be

The electoral college being abolished is very difficult and this has failed each time someone tired. Keeping the electoral college is also difficult because it has not served its purpose and is outdated. I believe the best answer to this controversial issue is to reform this system, but reforming with the National Popular Vote is not very likely. The National Popular Vote seems impossible because you need small states and you must get votes from every vote. If the national popular vote ever works to will take years and the road elections have taken we need this reform as soon as possible. The main factors needed for the reform is that all states will have a say in how to pick the electoral votes and the size of state shouldn’t matter. States should not be forced to choose a method and no state will feel as if they do not have a say in who represents them. We must ensure voters feel as if their vote matter, they are heard, and considered within the government. A reform will also help with the candidates with the most votes within the popular vote wins the presidential election because we are a country for the people. What the people want is what they should have. A reform will allow for less controversy surrounding the presidential

    In the Bush vs Gore presidential election in 2000, Gore won the popular vote, but lost the electoral vote resulting in Bush’s presidency. It was one of the closest elections, sure. But this should have raised some red flags to the American government and people. The popular vote being less important to me is absolutely ridiculous;

The Electoral College has been broken ever since it was put into the cConstitution and it has only gained more problems as political parties grew. The Electoral College is the system that the United States uses to elect their presidents every four years. The system is setup in a way where the popular vote does not determine who wins the election but the amount of electoral votes you get does. Each state is given one vote per Senator and Representative they have in the House of Representatives. Whichever presidential candidate wins more electoral votes in the states wins the entire election, no matter what the popular vote is. The Electoral College should not be completely abolished, but it does need to be changed from its original format. The popular vote should have more influence on the election, political parties should be eliminated, and each state should be given the same amount of votes per population rather than votes per Senator and Representatives.

In case of a tie, or if no candidate receives a majority of all electoral votes cast for president, the choice of president is thrown in the House of Representatives but the election is conducted on a one-state one-vote basis.The Electoral College system further distorts the presidential campaign by causing the candidates to grant extra weight to the parochial needs of the swing states. Now that we’ve covered this let’s move on to my last point.