When signing up for a social media platform, do you ever read those labourious pages of terms and conditions? According to an article published by The Guardian, a whopping 73% of people do not read the fine print when registering themselves for these information seeking platforms. These platforms are instruments of communication, which people all around the world use to exchange ideas, information and facts about themselves. While sharing this information people tend to believe that they are communicating on a secure platform however these people have not read the fine print. Individuals, who believe this, believe that they are communicating with in a private environment. They are obviously wearing blinkers. There is no such thing as privacy in the 21st century in which we are living, even though it should be our right. In reality we are being …show more content…
This is to protect themselves as well as to protect the younger generations. Many platforms have an age restriction of 13 years or older. Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat and Instagram all have the age restriction of 13 years. Instagram asks for consent before sharing/selling your information to a third party. Once Snapchat has given advertisers your information the advertiser cannot identify you. With Pintrist you are able to provide only the information you want to give them and this information will then by used to provide you with suggested pinboards. Pintrist does share credit card information, however they do ask for consent first. YouTube allows you to tailor your content as well as change your setting as other platforms allow. One does have the right to privacy, however the privacy granted to them via social media is not what it is thought to be. One receives as much privacy as the platform will allow. Sometimes this means none at all. Why should our right to privacy in reality be any different to that on the
Private information that was previously segregated now becomes easily accessible to employers, colleagues, recruiters, and clients, among other perhaps unintended audiences” (Abril, 2012, para. 4). Yes, most social media sites attain privacy settings but one must always remember there are hiccups in everything on the internet and no guarantees leaks will not occur.
The right to privacy is protected by statutory law. As I stated before, the right to privacy is a concept that states one's personal information is protected from public scrutiny. Keeping your privacy conceal can protect your reputation, information, and personal life. With your information safe, you're less likely to be judged (poorly). Also, multiple amendments to the U.S. Constitution allude to the right to privacy. With all that said, that's why I cherish the right to privacy, I don't want my life transparent like a
As Oliver Diggelmann and Maria Nicole Cleis wrote in a 2014 article published in the Human Rights Law Review, the right to privacy has two distinct meanings: “privacy as freedom from society” and “privacy as dignity.”
Privacy! It’s an elementary principle we all value and fight to protect. However, with technological trends, such as Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and Snapchat, our lives have now become accessible to all. These social media platforms have become part of our daily lives, from sharing personal information or activities to communal networking. The fascination to be trendy and acquire followers, is compromising our privacy principles and places us at significant risk. It’s remarkably easy to pretend that we control what personal information we share, however, realistically we leave technological trails every day we login to these apps, or browse the internet. For the most part, it seems that
1) In the articles,"Could You Become a Mean Meme" and "Are You Being Watched?" both by Kristin Lewis. It talks about all the advantages and disadvantage of using social media. In "Could You Become a Mean Meme" it states an advantage, " The great thing about these platforms is that they allow us to participate in eachothers lives by sharing moments both big and small-In real time" (Lewis 13). Instead of being in the real world talking face to face or share a big or small moment in your life, you can do it straightly off your phone or almost any device you have. On the other hand, there is also disadvantages.
“For people who use blogs and social-networking sites like diaries, putting their personal information out there for the world to see this presents a serious risk. There are even many people out in the world who believe that social media has escalated to which will last forever: ‘I think young people are seduced by the citizen-media notion of the Internet: that everyone can have their minutes of fame,’ says Barry Schuler, the former CEO of AOL who is now the co-producer of a new movie, Look, about public video surveillance. "But they're also putting themselves out there—forever.’” (Bennett 3).
Twitter one of the most popular social networking sites. Both personal and corporate users enjoy twittering to engage in information-sharing. It has social as well as commercial utility. However, as is also the case with Facebook, Twitter is still striving to make its business model profitable as well as generate user traffic. Advertisers and marketers are interested in Twitter's ability to provide data about potential customers as well as its ability to expose users to advertising. However, there have been a number of concerns regarding the monetization of Twitter. Twitter's potential for 'data-mining' is alarming to many users. "By virtue of having a large number of users, Twitter also possessed such a database of personal information, as well as a large archive of personal messages" (Privacy issues and monetizing Twitter, 2011, Richard Ivey School of Business: 6).
The UDHR clearly states that everyone has the right to privacy. In addition, article 17 of the International Convention on Civil and
Most, if not all social media applications come with privacy settings. Settings can be adjusted so that only friends can see what your teens profile. It is my suggestion that this setting be set to the highest privacy available. Profiles contain names, addresses, phone numbers, email addresses and other personal data.
Dave Eggers’s novel, The Circle, explores how a social media company can abuse its powers to monopolize and survey all of its users. In this novel, a company named The Circle starts as a small social media site then grows to reach millions of users, and it eventually takes over advertising, government, trade, exchange, and all sources of information. This extreme surveillance is satiric because the novel’s reality is far too outrageous that it would not be possible in our world. Yet, Eggers forces the reader to consider the extent to which our privacy should be protected, and this question is important because it forces the reader to reflect on his/her reality and use of social media; Eggers suggests that privacy and secrecy are basic human
There have been several policies put into effect to protect one's privacy through social media.
In all honesty, despite the imposing impulse to expose ourselves today on social media we all must resist in order to preserve a reasonable degree of “personal privacy,” who cares about what the world will think or
We do have the right to privacy but to an extent. When it jeopardises the safety of others then I give full
Do you ever feel like you are being watched or followed, feels a little creepy right? That is exactly what is happening every time you log into one of the many social media sites offered via the world wide web. Some users say that if you aren’t doing anything wrong, what does it matter if our every move is being tracked and recorded. It matters because our privacy is being violated, having privacy is one of our basic human rights. When we sign up on social media we knowingly give up that right as Kent Anderson, author of “People are Willing to Trade Less Privacy for Access to Social Media”, writes, “ Social networks are based on sharing information, so anyone using such a network is automatically accepting
The Right to Privacy can be described as a human right and an element of various legal traditions which may restrain both government and private party action that threatens the privacy of individuals. On the topic of an individual 's Right to Privacy, there comes controversy. Some would argue that it is a right and others would say it is a privilege. Those that say it is a privilege, would argue that the Right to Privacy can be taken from anyone at anytime without their consent. On the flip side, those who believe it is a right to have privacy, would argue that an individual 's privacy is theirs indefinitely and they have say as to what can be monitored or taken away. However, a person should be able to keep their privacy rights as long as that individual is not invading on other people 's property whether that be invading land, hacking into online accounts, or breaking the law while putting others at risk.