Marcia Clemmit 's Social Media Explosion is about social media 's impact on people 's privacy, their community activity, and their ability to socialize with real people face-to-face. In the first section of the article, Marcia Clemmit explains how social media breaks the boundaries of privacy by sharing your information online without your knowledge and how social media sells user information to companies (Clemmit 81). Then Clemmit writes about social media 's role in community engagement and how social media changes the way one interacts with their people. People used social media in social situations like the defense of Planned Parenthood and the black lives matter movement (Clemmit 86). Finally, Clemmit concludes with an article about …show more content…
In the modern age, responsibility for adults has been thrown out of the window. Examples of this concept of denying responsibility on the internet are websites of pure anonymity, like 4Chan. Granted, this website is not as popular as websites like Facebook or Twitter, but it has built itself a reputation nevertheless. 4Chan is known on the internet for both its toxic cloud they trail on the internet, with bullying events like “the Fappening”, when a group of people online chose to simultaneously leak the nude photos of either people they knew or celebrities, being commonplace, and for its tendency to drag things into the real world. Although the website was technically not intended to be as such, incidents of murder and child pornography happen on a daily basis. Adults also demonstrate a lack of responsibility with popular trends being horrible exploitations like “Swatting” and “doxxing”. Swatting is finding someone’s address online, usually on a live stream for actual feedback, and reporting a crime that never has or never will happen because of the target. The goal here is to call a local S.W.A.T team to the target’s house for nothing more than a few laughs, and because the entire attack was anonymous, nobody can be held accountable. Doxxing is another example of internet recklessness. Doxxing is when someone, usually a hacker or a bully of the target, figures out another person’s personal information, which can include phone numbers, addresses, or even social
“Social media platforms held the promise of being more egalitarian and democratic than mass media in a sense that all users could equally participate and contribute content” (Dijck & Poell, 6). This explains a basic purpose of social media that remains consistent with the democratic values of freedom that the U.S. is founded upon by providing citizens with a platform where they are free to speak their mind. What makes this even more interesting is the ability for people to share their opinions on a stage that has relatively no geographical boundaries. Rather than restricting the spread of individuals’ beliefs, social networking sites help spread messages and information to anyone, faster than was previously possible. According to Dijck and Poell, “social media platforms seldom deal with ‘natural’ geographically or demographically delineated audiences; instead, they expedite connections between individuals, partly allowing the formation of strategic alliances or communities through users’ initiative” (Dijck & Poell, 8). Social networking sites are naturally designed to increase connectivity and interactions among individuals with common interests or beliefs. The idea of connectivity has significantly influenced the way in which protests are held in America and around the world.
Nowadays, social media is practically a staple in everyone’s lives. While some use it solely to stay in touch with friends or family, others wouldn’t even know the latest of current events if they didn’t have their phone notifying them that their friends are talking about it. The Internet and social media have bred a new generation of socially-aware people which has given them a platform to learn and share on. Because this generation’s growth is largely-based online and through technology, it has formed a new brand of social activism. While some feel social media has made it too easy to claim a movement or position, others believe that it is what we need to spread a message
In January of 2017 there were over half a million active users on Twitter (“Social Media Statistics”). Social media has gone from a niche platform to a foundation of social interaction, bringing its flaunting nature to the forefront of culture. The widespread use of the internet and social media in today’s world contributes to an increasingly public society, mimicking the lack of privacy between citizens in Aldous Huxley’s, “Brave New World”. Despite the fact that a public culture can increase exploitation and social pressures, the connectivity it brings is more beneficial to society as a whole.
In his essay, “Get Over It,” Jeff Jarvis argues that “ . . . our supposed privacy crisis, . . . could result in our missing many of the opportunities the net affords to connect with each other and with information” (430). On the other hand, Andrew Keen, in “Sharing is a Trap,” states that “. . . this increasingly ubiquitous social network . . . is invading the 'sacred precincts' of private and domestic life” (426). With all the posting, tweeting, and blogging privet lives have become open to the public. SMS, emails and even calls are being traced, recorded and reviewed every day, you are not safe on the internet. Keen’s argument regarding social media is valid in regard to the transformative nature of the Internet, privacy and “publicness.”
Since the invention of the Internet, people have become indulged with its copious functions, from making advanced programs to learning how to do new projects to social media. Social media has evolved over the years, from Friendster to Myspace to Facebook, since the late 1990s, and people have incorporated it into their lives. It is the modern way for people to connect and communicate with anyone and everyone across the globe. Plus, social media is everywhere; people utilize it when they are on the bus, at the checkout line, and even when they are using the restroom. In Peggy Orenstein’s “The Way We Live Now: I Tweet, Therefore I Am,” she propounds that social media has altered society. Social media has changed society’s priorities, characteristics, and mentality.
One of the most highly debated issues in the business world is the use of social media profiles as a determining factor in the hiring process. Some people feel that using someone’s social media profile is an invasion of privacy because it uses something from their personal life to determine their professional success. As long as the company follows some basic guidelines I believe there is nothing wrong with them looking into the profiles of their potential employees. It is important to point out that while looking at many of the different ethical ideologies, this practice does not violate the ethical conducts. Teleologists would agree that looking into someones profile will ensure that you are hiring someone who will conduct themselves in a proper manner. Therefore, the means of looking into their personal lives justifies the ends in which you hire a professional with good character. Deontologists would likely agree that as long as the company does not try to find loop holes to see into protected accounts that they are respecting the rights of the individual and therefore are not being unethical. I believe that it is reasonable for a company to use social media profiles as a basis for hiring because everything posted on the internet is public domain, it allows them to get an understanding of who the potential client is, and you want to ensure that you are hiring someone who fits in to your company.
Privacy, it is the one thing that we seem to not have enough of. But the question must be asked, “Whose fault is that?” The answer is quite simple, ours. Social media is the number one cause of lack of privacy. It is something about social media that make us loose our sense of reason and place all sorts of personal information on the Internet for all the world to see. But, social media is not the only reason for the privacy breech. There are many reasons, and computer hackers are just one. Our email information is sold, bank loans, mortgages, and the list could go on and on.
The emerge of our privacy invasion has mount with government surveillance by the U.S national security system (Baumer, Roth, Epstein, 2014). Government surveillance and social website such as Facebook, Twitter, Google, and YouTube are source of privacy invasion (Cole, 2015). Connecting to social website to communication with friends, family, and co-worker; sharing, updating news, and information which overcast privacy according to Cole, 2015. Many Americans became occupied to social media and forget to think about the important of confidentiality and privacy. Multiple surges website captured personal profile once information shared with the media. This information became accessible to the public, and privacy can no longer be private that lead to the erosion of privacy (Cole, 2015)
5. Pages 443, 445, text, social movements. Write about Facebook, other social networking sites and their impact on society.(good and bad)
“Social media allows people to connect with each other to create and share information. It is people-powered communication, an authentic dialogue motivated by a basic human desire to share information” (CIPD, Social Media and Employee Voice Report 2013). ‘Click’ and my message is on its way to my friend’s Facebook inbox hundred of miles away. The astonishing speed of how quick we can communicate in today’s societies, all thanks to social media. The invention of Facebook simplified everything we know about communication. We can connect to people whenever and wherever, sharing information has never been more convenient and exciting. In Shane Hipps’ Article, “ Is Facebook Killing Our Souls?,” he has no intention to impede technological advancements, instead he wants users to understand technologies with insights. According to my research, although Hipps ' points has some merits, I disagree with him because he overgeneralized the impacts that Facebook and other social media has on users’ behaviors and identities.
The almost omnipresent Internet transforms our lives, connecting us to family, friends, and the world in ways inconceivable only a few years ago. Through social media, we actively participate in creating, editing, and consuming a never-ending stream of data. Private corporations and protagonists of political or social change all vie to reach and engage highly targeted
The birth of social media in the late 1990’s has dramatically evolved our primary means of expression. Posts and tweets provide platforms which instantly project individuals’ voices into the digital realm to be seen and heard by a hypothetically universal audience with an immediacy previously impossible. These outlets particularly appeal to teens and young adults, who desire simultaneously both an independent character and a shared place of belonging. Self-branding achieves the former and a validative, digital form of acknowledgement, via follows and likes, the latter. However, technology's inherently unlimited nature and the speed with which it delivers messages threatens our own identities and personal spaces. Additionally, there exists further friction between individual and group values. A citizen’s understanding of their right to privacy and free expression may differ from their nation’s evolving interpretation of these laws. Central to these conflicts is a human desire to carve out for ourselves a piece of a place where we may live as unique individuals who remain a part of a bigger whole. But, given the balances that exist within the personal struggle for identity and community and within a nation’s struggle to interpret privacy and speech laws in a way that securely respects its people and its history, it is impossible to weigh each factor evenly. As social media becomes normalized across more generations and its reach expands, we will increasingly prioritize our
Some academics said the 21st century is an era of network and information. Currently, with the development of mobile internet technology, the mobile devices such as mobile phone are becoming more and more popular, it also results in the spread and development of social media, people can chat with others in everywhere and what they need is only a mobile phone. According to the demographics of social media users (2012), there are 67% of internet users who use any social networking sites. Dave (2017) also provides some data in his research shows that there are over 1870 million active users are using Facebook which is the top 1 social media app in the world. Unluckily, according to Matthew et al. (2012), with the popularity of social media and the number of users increase, privacy concerns are becoming a big issue that the social media users facing, the researcher claimed that there are many privacy issues in photos sharing services and location-based services in social media apps by analyzing the big data of social media (Matthew et al. 2012). This paper will explore the privacy concerns for the use of social media to look for the main factors that could violate the privacy of users and certain ways to solve the problems.
Most of us use social media to communicate with our family, friends and our loved once. Since almost all of my friends live 8000 mile away, I use Facebook, Instagram, and viber to keep in touch with them. Bur recently I started noticing it has become more than a means of communication. I start posting a picture and obsesses about how many likes I get, checking other peoples Facebook just to see if they have more friends than me, believing every post without questioning if it’s a fact and funny enough I start sending friend request for people I don’t even know. Christine Rosen, a senior editor of the New Atlantis and resident fellow at the Ethics and Public policy Center in Wessington, D.C. on “In the Beginning Was the World”, she wrote how technology is affecting the society’s critical reading ability. Peggy Orenstein, an author and a contributing writer for the New York Times, on “I Tweet, Therefore I Am” she talks about how social media is distracting as from fully live in the moment. Even though the development of technology have increased the quality of life, it also brought undeniable challenges to our society. The constant use of social media and internet has increase society attention-seeking, Distracted, and decries critical reading. The use of social media has increased dramatically throughout the years.
More recently than in years past, digital technology and social media have grown to become a part of our everyday lives. The recent rise in those who own smartphones allows this everyday use of digital technology and social networking to be easier than ever before. At any time and any place, we have the ability to “socialize” with nearly anyone—even celebrities who have no idea most of us even exist. The continuous consumption of digital media has altered once personal face-to-face communication to just that, digital. More and more people seem to be living in what Sonia Maasik and Jack Solomon call “The Cloud”. “The Cloud” is a seemingly alternate universe of which communication is altered from personal to digital. This universe has led to debates over whether or not these online communities are real or whether social media is actually social. Various digital media sources also encourage users to create individual identities, of which may or may not actually be real. It seems as though our reliance on digital technology and social media have allowed the determination of certain aspects of our lives. Although social media allows us to connect with nearly anyone at any time, Americans have taken advantage of its use, and their attention has been drawn away from real life interactions to digital ones. The ramifications of such influences reflect the hidden insecurities of Americans and, ironically, emphasize our inclination to boast about ourselves by allowing others to see the