Introduction
In the recent years, a big debate has transpired in the realm of college athletics: should college athletes be paid to play? The answer to this question is very complicated and will continue to be debated for years to come. This question has been debated for a long time but has recently become much bigger as more and more people watch games, buy jerseys, and tickets become more expensive; therefore athletic departments are making more money. There are people who have very good arguments for both sides of this dispute. One major lense to look at this topic through is through ethics. Is it ethical, morally right, for college students to get paid for preparing for professional sports where they do get paid? Or is a scholarship (full
…show more content…
Since many athletes receive scholarship, and there is no fair way to pay athletes between different divisions, schools, and sports, they should not be paid. Many new ideas will come up to be debated and new lenses will open as more and more people start looking into this dispute. Citations
Bokshan, A. (2011, November 2). Viewpoint: Why college athletes should not be paid, Retrieved October 9, 2014 from https://goo.gl/3MVcBE
Cooper, K. J. (2011). Should College Athletes Be Paid to Play?. Diverse: Issues In Higher Education, 28(10), 12-13. Retrieved October 24, 2017
Dodd, D. (2015, February 27). Players about to get paid as money changes game in college athletics. Retrieved October 29, 2017, from https://goo.gl/xuKyjc
Lemmons, M. (2017, March 29). College Athletes Getting Paid? Here Are Some Pros And Cons. Retrieved October 29, 2017, from https://goo.gl/dC54iV
Mitchell, H., & Edelman, M. (2013). Should College Student-Athletes Be Paid?. U.S. News Digital Weekly, 5(52), 17. Retrieved October 26, 2017
Walch, J., & Marshall, B. (2016, October 20). Should athletes be paid to play? Retrieved October 29, 2017, from https://goo.gl/UYHf3P
WOLVERTON, B. (2015, January 23). New Benefits for Athletes Trigger Talk
Over the past 30 years or so college athletics have gained immense popularity and has resulted in an amazing amount of revenues from the NCAA and its Subsidiaries. The debate as to whether college athletes should be paid even beyond their athletic scholarships. While reading this paper it will answer the question as to whether college athletes should be paid by exploring the reasons for and against the payments of these athletes beyond their scholarship.
College sports are one of the largest and fastest growing markets in today’s culture. With some college sports games attracting more viewers than their professional counterparts, the NCAA is one of the most profiting organizations in America. Recently there has been controversy in the world of college sports as to whether the college athletes that are making their universities and the NCAA money should receive payment while they are playing their respective sport. Many believe that these athletes should be paid. Others argue that they are already receiving numerous benefits for playing that sport from their universities. Many of the proponents of paying college athletes are current or former college athletes who believe their hard work and hours put into practice and competing go under appreciated. They feel that while the athletes are making the university money, the athletes do not receive any cut of these profits. Opponents feel that athletes already receive numerous perks and should not receive extra compensation on top of the perks they already receive.
With the universities pulling in more than twelve billion dollars, the rate of growth for college athletics surpasses companies like McDonalds and Chevron (Finkel, 2013). The athletes claim they are making all the money, but do not see a dime of this revenue. The age-old notion that the collegiate athletes are amateurs and students, binds them into not being paid by the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). This pay for play discussion has been talked about since the early 1900s but recently large steps are being made to actually make a change. There are many perspectives on the payment of collegiate student athletes coming from the NCAA, the athletes themselves, and the university officials.
Throughout the years college sports have been about the love of the game, filled with adrenaline moments. However, the following question still remains: Should college athletes get paid to play sports in college? Seemingly, this debate has been endless, yet the questions have gone unanswered. The National Collegiate Athletics Association (NCAA) plays a vital role in this debate. The NCAA is a billion dollar industry, but yet sees that the athlete should get paid for their hard work and dedication.
Whether or not student-athletes should be paid has been a hotly debated topic since the 1900s. College athletes spend just as much time, if not more time, practicing and devoting time and energy to sports as they do academics. For this, many athletes are rewarded with scholarship money. However, many people believe it is not enough. Should we pay student-athletes a slice of the wealth or is a full-ride scholarship enough? (Business Insider). What if the athlete gets injured? Where does the money come out of to support each athlete’s salary? The huge amount of money being generated from college sports has led some people to think that the athletes are entitled to some of that revenue. While, some think that student-athletes should be paid, others disagree for various reasons.
Ever since college students started playing sports, back in 1879 when Harvard played Yale in the first collegiate sports game, the question of whether college athletes should be paid was addressed. From that point on athletes, coaches, and college administrators have brought forward points agreeing or disagreeing with the notion of paying college students. The students argue that they deserve to be paid due to the revenue that they bring for the college and because of the games they play and the championships they win. At first the idea of paying college athletes was out of the question, but now the argument has gone from a simple yes or no to a heated debate. Since college athletes are given a free education, they should not also be paid.
The question of whether or not college athletes should get paid is of heated debate in todays times. While many believe that student athletes are entitled to income, It remains undougtibly a concern of moral interest to universities across the country. This paper is going to explain the pros and cons that come with allowing student athletes the right to receive a salary.
The grand debate of whether to pay college athletes continues today; yet, there are so many other amenities provided to the athletes that they are practically paid through those. College athletes are considered amateurs therefore they should not be paid. This debate has been going on for many years and there has not been a consensus on what to do.
There have been ongoing arguments over the past decade of whether or not college athletes should be paid to play. Many argue that they do not have time to get real jobs because the requirements for the sport that they participate in are far too demanding. Others cite that these athletes are provided full scholarships to attend the schools at which they are playing the sport. However regardless of the argument, I still feel that college athletes should NOT be paid to play.
Should College Athletes Be Paid Outline Thesis Statement Should college athletes be paid to play sports in college? Main Ideas Should they be paid and why The reason why professional players are being paid What they should do if they do agree to pay them Topic sentence idea: should college athletes be paid and why Research concept: College Education Supporting Idea: They are not just playing for free the school is giving them a free college education. Connecting to next Concept: Another reason why they should not get paid is because they are still playing for a school Research Concept: They are still playing for a school Supporting Ideas: They are still for a school just like in High School.
Should College Athletes Be Paid? In today’s society college athletes being paid or not carries a lot of controversy. In the article “Should College Athletes Be Paid?”, Joe Nocera and Bob Williams both argue this issue. Even though college athletes help make money for the school, college players should not be paid because it could force discrimination amongst other sports, and students could lose their focus.
There has been a recent debate on whether or not college athletes should be paid. Many people believe they should get paid, but many others believe they should not be paid. College athletes should not be paid because the students should worry about their education, it is an extracurricular activity, and the Ncaa does not approve of it.
14 Nov. 2017. " Should College Athletes Be Paid? - Smartasset." SmartAsset. N. p., 2017.
College Athletes Should Not Get Paid To Play “A funny thing happens when you play with a love of the game: you play better. When you focus less on results, and more on the process of playing and your love for the game, nerves disappear, the weight of expectations falls away, and the burden of playing for a scholarship or scouts ceases to be an issue. I call it "taking the backpack" off”(Wilson, Lindsey). As a new school year approaches, discussions begin about paying student athletes.
Cooper, Josh. "College Athletes Should NOT Be Paid." BDL Sports. N.p., 19 July 2011. Web. 10 Nov. 2015. .