preview

Tanglewood Case 3 Summary

Decent Essays

The 4/5 ratio shows that there is evidence that points disparate impact discrimination in the Tanglewood organization for most job categories. There are a few job categories that hit the 80% of the 4/5 rule. The store associate white to non-white and white to African-American comparison computed in the 90% ratio. The internal shift leader white to non-white computed at 79%, the internal and external department manager white to nonwhite both ranked above 80%, and the internal assistant store manager white to African-American ranked at 89%. All other job categories fell well below the 80%. The worst category was store manager internal and external white to African-American. Both of these comparisons showed 0% of African-Americans have been hired for a store manager position. The lack of diversity in the upper management will cause legal issues for Tanglewood.
The concentration data also shows evidence that point to disparate impact discrimination in the Tanglewood organization across all job categories. The store manager categories again showed to be the worst category. The white concentration for the store manager is 69.57%, non-white is 30.43% and African-Americans is 0%.The highest African-American concentration was found in the store associate category. This category shows white concentration at 83.59%, non-white …show more content…

Administering test to promote internal employees is a change needed to the Tanglewood organizations promotion procedure. These measures would also need to be administered without regard to race, color, national origin, sex and disability (Heneman, Judge, & Kammeyer-Mueller, 2006, p. 356). Another measure on the test would be an evaluation of associates job performance and rating of their preferences for job rewards (Heneman, Judge, & Kammeyer-Mueller, 2006, p.

Get Access