The James-Bard Bypothesis Of Feeling

To coordinate with our current chapter on emotions, our class watched the film Inside Out. The story was about the emotions, Joy, Sadness, Anger, Fear, and Disgust, controlling a goofy, honest, and caring 11 year old named Riley. Inside her brain, the emotions used controls to decide the way Riley feels. The part of the brain the “control center” in Inside Out represented was the Limbic System. I know this because during in our Body and Mind unit, the part of the brain we most associated with mood and emotions was this system. It is best defined as a complex system of nerves and networks in the brain, including areas concerned with instinct and mood. The Limbic System’s main control is emotions and drives feelings, which was the main purpose of the emotions “control center.”

Identify which theory of emotion you think is the most valid. What makes this theory more valid to you than the others? Identify which theory of emotion you think is least valid. What makes this theory less valid? Your response should be at least 300 hundred words. The four major theories of emotion: James-Lange, Cannon-Bard Facial-feedback and Schechter’s two-factor; emphasize different sequences or aspects of the three elements of emotion cognitions, arousal and expression. The Cannon-Bard theory is most valid in my opinion, the theory holds that all emotions are physiologically similar and arousal, cognitions, and expression occur simultaneously. Arousal is not necessary in this theory. Both Cannon and Bard propose the Thalamus gland in the brain sends signals to the cerebral cortex and the ANS; in return the messages to the cortex produce the cognitive experience of emotion. In contrast, the Facial-feedback theory is the main culprit of our emotions, I do not agree with this theory; I believe facial expressions are a result of what we are feeling inside within our emotions. The face is what we can associate to a specific feeling or emotion. That is how we can tell when someone is feeling sad, or is afraid. I believe each theory holds a bit of truth, but to which one is completely right I s not possible. They are theories and they can be tested and tried and the most positive and negative reports concluded, but they can never be proven. Out of these four theories,

The four major theories of emotion are the James-Lange theory, the Cannon-Bard theory, the Schacter-Singer theory, and the Lazarus theory. The James-Lange theory claims that an event first causes physiological arousal and also a physical response.  It is not until then that the person interprets the physical response as an emotion. The Cannon-Bard theory states that emotion -provoking stimuli are received by the senses and are then relayed simultaneously to the cerebral cortex, which provides the conscious mental experience of the emotion, and to the sympathetic nervous system, which produces the physiological state of arousal. The Schacter-Singer theory states that for an emotion to occur there must first be a physiological arousal, and second there must be an explanation for the arousal. The Lazarus theory is the theory that an emotion-provoking stimulus triggers a cognitive appraisal, which is followed by the emotion and physiological arousal. The most valid theory of emotion is the Cannon-Bard theory. He says that being afraid of something not only constitutes emotional fear, but it also brings about a rapid heartbeat. Concurring with the Cannon-Bard theory, we have a many different nerve systems within the human body that can be triggered simultaneously. This theory is more valid then the rest simply because of the adrenaline that is release into your body when excited or in the mist of eminent danger. The

In chapter seven, it talks about emotions which are internal sensations that are shaped by physiology, perceptions, language, and social experiences. It is said that we feel emotions when external stimuli cause a physiological change in our bodies. For example, before and while giving my identity presentation, I felt anxious and nervous. I knew this because I was sweating, light-headed, and my stomach was turning. Another example for me would be whenever I get extremely mad because it feels like my whole body is on fire.

William James believes that our emotions are caused by bodily reactions in which then promotes the mental feeling of the emotion. For example, James says that we feel sad because we cry, rather than we crying because we feel said (65). Too, James states that we are not born to be afraid, sad or anything, but as life progresses, humans and animals eventually discover these feelings toward a particular situation or object (68). It also occurs that even if a person does not express their emotion externally, their body tends to act in a way regardless of how the person expresses their emotions externally. An example of this is what James says when an individual is depressed, “the flexors tend to prevail” (69). Of course, In William James’ time,

The theory of emotional contagion has been an interest of many writers both in the field of psychology and science. The root is not clear whether who

Mixed Feelings, by Sunny Bains, is an article written about the alteration of human senses. Bains gives information about different experiments that are trying to prove that our sense can be modified or expanded. In the article, it goes into details about how our five senses can individually be changed by using or wearing specific contraptions the researchers created. The purpose of Bain's article is to persuade the reader to believe that there are ways to modify our senses.

She provides scientific evidence that shows brain waves sync up when people are invested in a conversation. Second, she discusses how the hormone oxytocin allows you to feel your loved one’s pain. Last, she describes how “loving-kindness meditation” improves vagal tone, thus improving health. All of Fredrickson’s evidence she uses to supports her points illustrates how her understanding relies on nature. Each of these functions are involuntary as they are the effect of chemical reactions in the neurons on an everyday basis.

“[The protagonist] lunged for a yellow coin lying on the blue design of the carpet, touching it and sending a surprised shriek to join those around me. [He] tried frantically to remove my hand but could not let go. A hot, violent force tore through [his] body, shaking [him] like a wet rat. The rug was electrified. The hair bristled up on [his] head as [he] shook [himself] free. [The narrator’s] muscles jumped, [his] nerves jangled, writhed” (Ellison 1217).

A deeper demonstration of Charles envisioning what he has done, and the distress it causes him. However, in his interaction with a psychiatrist he is questioned “how he feels” (40). However, Charles is unable to pinpoint his physical state. Significantly, it is the link between bodily sensations of feeling that can enable others to interpret the agent’s mentality. This link between physical feeling and emotional mentality is coined as an affective appraisal.

Fear can create an instinctual response to perceived danger. A good example is of the time my husband and I were alone on a long hike in the jungles of Belize and came upon a fer-de-lance snake that would most likely have killed us with its bite. Without any time passing, my instinct of fight or flight emerged and I pushed my husband out of the way, telling him to run as I did. Also, in an instinctual state of fear, someone can perform tasks they did not think were possible such as being able to lift a

Researchers have debated about the phenomenon with emotions. Debates on this topic have and will continue to for many more years. Researchers have attempted to understand why one has emotions and came up with the five different theories. The first theory is the James-Lange theory, which argues that an event can cause physiological arousal first and, it can be interpret this as an arousal. Second theory is the Cannon-Bard theory that argues that all humans experience a physiological arousal and an emotional one at the same time. It still does not give any attention to the role of the thoughts or an outward

Many emotions are associated with beliefs or judgements. Empirical thinking is primarily linked to experience in the sense that perceptual experiences can provide reasons for empirical belief and judgement (Goldie 2004). One

Chapter 2 is centered on the early attempts to identify the brain’s components of emotions. Key researchers that are discussed are a Cornell neuroanatomist, James Papez, and aforementioned physician and neuroscientist Paul MacLean, who worked at Yale and the National Institutes of Mental Health. Together, this pair of researchers conducted seminal medial temporal lobe lesion experiments. The resulting idea was that the emotional brain is composed of a set of interconnected structures in the core of the brain. MacLean dubbed these structures as the “limbic system”. The function of the limbic system and it relationship to emotion was widely debated by many researchers.

Thoughts are just electrochemical reactions to Stimuli. When we experience anything, we can react to it, and generally these reactions plot as ponderings. Yet would we say we are these reactions? We must be more than reactions to helpers, especially if we can control these reactions properly. It would be disabling to know the inconsistent examinations which appear in our minds, especially the ones which are seen as uncommon or disturbing, are to be characteristically our own. An idea or thought can be for the most part characterized as a mental wonder inside the human personality that can influence a singular 's conduct to a huge degree. Amid intuition