The Process Of Deduction Logic

Modus ponens is when p is true and q is true, which is proven in the final line of the truth table. In the third line, it is impossible for valid results when p is true and q is false. The implication is invalid when the premise is true and the conclusion is false, which correlates with the false conclusion. Therefore, modus ponens is valid for true premises (Rosin).

In our day to day studies, almost everything is transformed into our understanding by the creation of arguments in our brains. An argument is basically described as a process of making what we think clear to ourselves and others .the final goal of an argument is usually to reach a conclusion which is sufficiently persuasive to convince someone of something. Any argument that relies on collection of data, on measurement, on information collected somehow (rather than on a general principle) is known as an inductive argument. On the other hand an argument which begins with a generally true phrase to a particular phrase is known as a deductive argument.

With your first argument I think you should add more to your premises or add another premise to support your conclusion. This example gives a very broad overview on alcohol related accidents. How much was the person that got into the accident drinking. You could add a premise that states this many percent of people drive while being legally intoxicated. I would also add for premise one the percent of people that die in alcohol-related accidents every year or for a certain number of years. This will make your argument stronger.

A deductive argument tends to work from the generalized to the more specific. It often referred to as a top-down approach informally. The conclusions that are made in deductive argument follow logically from the facts that are available. A deductive approach can be taken on the statement traditional publishing has been rendered unnecessary by the rise of digital publication. Electrical publishing which is also referred to as ePublishing or digital publishing involves the publication of e-books, electronic articles, digital libraries and EPUBS. It is becoming a common trend to distribute books, newspapers and even magazines directly to readers through tablet reading devices. This has been generated by vendors who operate online like Apple iTunes bookstore and books in the android market among others. Market researchers have made suggestions that most of the magazines and newspapers that will be in circulation will be done through digital means by 2015(Sader, 2004). Most of the publishing companies are also considering making agreements with these electronic publishing networks like Apple so that they can increase the publications through them and eventually no more traditional publishing will be done (Rothchild, I. 2006). From the look at the general trend in publishing that most people and firms are taking as depicted above, it is safe to take the deductive conclusion that "Traditional publishing has been rendered unnecessary by the

(Gordon, 1995) The process of deductive theories you can provide absolute proof if your conclusion. An example of deductive theories is when an investigation team considers the boyfriend or spouse of the murder of the girlfriend or wife. With inductive theories you begin with the data and then build on the conclusion. (Gordon, 1995) The process of inductive theories determines what general conclusions can be derived from the data used from research but never approaches the truth.

The methodology selected provides the researcher the framework to present information in a logical manner. The methodology section answers two fundamental questions: How data was collected or created and, how the data was examined and determined (Research, n.d.)?

Your example regarding deductive reasoning was well written, and it helped me. I do not have children, but parents tend to have natural investigator skills. Kristen you are right, the minute a person wake up from sleeping their bran instantly inserts into a world were minuscule and humongous decisions are needed to be made in order to survive and function properly.

I argued a deductive argument with my sister or what I thought was a deductive argument over taking my niece and nephew to the orthodontist, I argued I wasn't told about the kids orthodontist appointment and my sister said she told me weeks ago, which I have no recollection of this conversation taking place, Deductive Validity and Language accrued because if I can't remember the conversation taking place about the appointment for the kids my sister seems to think I can read minds if I told her she didn't tell me or remind me knowing I short term memory loss I was so mad I didn't get a remember she could have wrote a reminder on the calendar or something. Now I see my argument was invalid and my memory loss had everything to do with the fact my sister told me about the appointment weeks ago, I even heard the

Every researcher adopts a specific approach for his research study, which is very important step in every research. There are mainly two research approaches, inductive and deductive by looking to the research onion of Saunders et al (2009, p. 108). In inductive approach, researchers use their findings for the generation of theory. Theory is a term which can be use in different ways and in qualitative research researcher use this term about the explanation of observations. Inductive approach allows the researcher in previous literature and finds the new research question, where he comes up with the new theory after the analyzing. While deductive studies, use theory deductively and places it in the very beginning of the study. With the objective of testing or verifying a theory rather than developing it, state hypothesis and collects data to test it. Reflect on the confirmation or disconfirmation of the theory by the results (Creswell, 2009, p. 10- 14) and our choice for research approach is deductive approach.

Modus ponens is also known as affirming the antecedent. Modus ponens has a valid form that illustrates a more effective way of getting the conclusion with certainty. “An argument that affirms the antecedent has one premise and a second premise that affirms the antecedent of the conditional” (p. 165). The conclusion of the modus ponens argument confirms the consequent of the conditional.

Extending human knowledge in research can be challenging when an individual don’t have no systems to go by. In planning a research's design, sociologists use various of different formulas to help students analyze and understand the steps they will need to collect data. Studies have shown when investigating scientific merits, it is critical to think about bias. Even though, the quality of research topics or questions that can be asked are researchable, many of them can be endless. However, unless you grasp how to frame your question properly, by following the first stage in the student's guide to research, you will master the formula of how to proceed.

Since all three had an adverse reaction to me, I used deductive reasoning. Being so easily rejected, they appeared to be physically put off by my asking them for coffee. This reasoning led me to one simple conclusion, which was to ask myself if I had a right to ask any woman out, if I could cause such an adverse reaction. A woman once told me I looked too serious when interacting with her. I still do not know what she meant by that. It appeared I had been Sheldon Cooper long before Jim Parsons played the character.

Argument 1: Is it okay for my boyfriend to not cook nor clean on his days off?

Induction and deduction are pervasive elements in critical thinking. They are also somewhat misunderstood terms. Arguments based on experience or observation are best expressed inductively, while arguments based on laws or rules are best expressed deductively. Most arguments are mainly inductive. In fact, inductive reasoning usually comes much more naturally to us than deductive reasoning.

After which, a general inductive approach for analysis of the qualitative data including condensation of raw textual data using thematic coding was used to establish links between the evaluation and the research topic (Thomas, 2006). “The general inductive approach provides an easily used and systematic set of procedures for analyzing qualitative data that can produce reliable and valid findings” (Thomas, 2006, p. 237). “The outcome of an inductive analysis…[was developed into]…categories…[and] into a model or framework that summarizes the raw data and conveys key themes and processes” (Thomas, 2006, p. 240). The themes were then applied to the interview data provided by the study