preview

The Strange Case Of Dr Jekyll And Mr Hyde

Decent Essays

Critical Analysis: The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde In the novel, The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, Robert Louis Stevenson demonstrates the battle between good and evil that occurs within the individual. The novel is essentially an allegory for the internal struggle between these two sides of the human personality. The story is centered around a chemist named Henry Jekyll, who composes a concoction that allows him to shift between his typical, well-mannered self and an alternate evil identity that allows him to give into his sinful pleasures. In their critiques on the novel, Joyce Carol Oates and Henry James discuss Stevenson’s presentation of good vs. evil, as well as the significance of his message on the subject. …show more content…

Jekyll and Mr. Hyde is shaped by the idea of a dual personality. Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde highlights the dual nature of man by portraying man’s desire for an evil outlet. Oates says that “man is a mere polity of multifarious, incongruous, and independent denizens…[and] that Stevenson was himself a man enamored of consciously playing roles.” Here, Oates expresses that multiple personalities inhabit all men. With this statement she also connects Stevenson to the story by claiming that he, too, possessed numerous characters within himself. In the novel Jekyll confesses that “of the two natures that contended in the field of [his] consciousness…[he] was radically both” (Stevenson 62). Jekyll’s statement demonstrates that his personality was contradictory, but that both sides of his personality were a part of his true self. In accordance with this dual nature, Oates claims that “there is a split in man’s psyche between ego and instinct, between civilization and nature, and the split can never be healed.” This comment perfectly explains Dr. Jekyll’s situation. Due to the potion he created, Jekyll can transform between his civilized, respectable self and his heinous counterpart. Try as he might, Jekyll is no longer able to choose between these two countenances by the end of the novel. His choice is irreversible and ends up destroying him. Thus, as in real life, both sides of his psyche are inherently a part of …show more content…

James states that “it is not so much the profundity of the idea which strikes [him] so much as the art of the presentation- the extremely successful form.” James’s praise of Stevenson’s writing is warranted. Though the struggle between good and evil is not so much an original idea, Stevenson’s portrayal of this age-old conflict is what captivates the reader. James goes on to state that in the novel “there is genuine feeling for the perpetual moral question, a fresh sense of the difficulty of being good and the brutishness of being bad, but what there is above all is a singular ability in holding the interest.” Stevenson’s story is an intriguing one that keeps the reader uncertain until the very end. The novel portrays both sides of man’s nature in a way that highlights the features of both good and evil by offering perspective on the subject from the same man in both forms. Jekyll himself states that he “was no more [himself] when [he] laid aside restraint and plunged in shame, than when [he] labored…at the furtherance of knowledge or the relief of sorrow and suffering” (Stevenson 61). It is this open honesty from the main character at the end of the novel that not only enthralls the reader, but also offers fresh insight into the human condition in a unique

Get Access